#WhyWeDoResearch Tweetchat On Research Involving Adults Who Lack Capacity To Consent
24 May 2018Background to the #WhyWeDoResearch campaign
The hugely successful #WhyWeDoResearch social media campaign was established in 2014 to raise research awareness and opportunities to staff, patients and the public, and to start a conversation about research between all involved. It has quickly become a global phenomenon reaching over 22 countries. The Tweetfest is a timetable of tweetchats that cover a wide range of topics that are of interest to members of the research community, patients and public. Each tweetchat is hosted by an experienced ‘expert’ on the topic and encourages discussion by posting and responding to a series of questions on the topic. The tweetchats are open to everyone who wishes to join the discussion by adding the hashtag #WhyWeDoResearch to their responses. The third annual #WhyWeDoResearch Tweetfest took place in the week running up to International Clinical Trials Day on 20th May, and was arranged by Hazel Smith, Research Coordinator in the Paediatric ICU at Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin.
Research involving adults who lack capacity to consent
My current research focuses on the legal, ethical and practical issues surrounding the involvement in research of adults who lack capacity to consent as part of an NIHR Doctoral Research Fellowship funded by Health and Care Research Wales. A previous blog describes how my interest in this area developed from my role as a critical care nurse turned researcher. It is a subject that generates many questions and seemed like a topic that might be of interest for a tweetchat.
The tweetchat was particularly good timing as one of the studies from my Fellowship had just been published in the Journal of Medical Ethics. Our study found that the majority of health and social care professionals who participated lacked knowledge and understanding about the legal situation regarding adults lacking capacity in research. This included those who recruit participants, as well as Principle and Chief Investigators.
The study also revealed a deeper issue about attitudes towards the inclusion of people with impaired decision-making capacity in medical research, which we wrote about in a Journal of Medical Ethic blog.
So, it seemed like a great opportunity to discuss some of these issues with the #WhyWeDoResearch community, and to hear their thoughts and share their experiences.
The #WhyWeDoResearch tweetchat discussion
Over forty people, including both clinical and academic researchers, joined the discussion on research involving adults who lack capacity to consent. They joined from various parts of the UK, Ireland and the US. Four questions were used to facilitate the tweetchat by introducing the topic, identifying some of the challenges encountered, and thinking about what support or resources might be helpful. The responses are summarised by question below.
Feedback after the #WhyWeDoResearch tweetchat
The response was overwhelming with nearly 500 tweets/retweets during the hour! After the event people posted comments about how interesting and useful the tweetchat had been, and how much they had learned about the topic. The conversation has continued since too, with people getting in touch to ask follow-up questions or request advice or input into developing new resources.
Hosting a tweetchat has been a hugely valuable way to engage with lots of people with an interest in the topic, who have a range of experiences and views to share. It is a fantastic opportunity to communicate key aspects of the topic in a way that other traditional methods of dissemination and engagement would not. It also allows for two-way communication with the research community that can help identify areas where more support is needed, which helps shape my future plans. It is great fun too. Highly recommended!
Shepherd V, Griffith R, Sheehan M, et al Healthcare professionals’ understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey Journal of Medical Ethics. 25 April 2018. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104722
Shepherd V. Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on ‘evidence biased’ medicine.
BMC Medical Ethics. 2016 17:55 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0138-9
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016