{"id":2069,"date":"2025-11-27T11:18:10","date_gmt":"2025-11-27T11:18:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/?p=2069"},"modified":"2025-11-27T11:19:46","modified_gmt":"2025-11-27T11:19:46","slug":"frozen-2-tax-freezes-the-2-child-limit-and-what-the-2025-autumn-budget-means-for-wales","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/frozen-2-tax-freezes-the-2-child-limit-and-what-the-2025-autumn-budget-means-for-wales\/","title":{"rendered":"Frozen 2: Tax Freezes, the 2-Child Limit (and what the 2025 Autumn Budget means for Wales)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>By Guto Ifan, Ed Gareth Poole and Owain Cynfab<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered her second budget, after months of speculation, briefings and uncertainty.<\/p>\n<p>The much-trailed worsening of economic forecasts turned out to be slightly less consequential for the public finances than originally thought. As expected, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) downgraded their assumptions on future productivity growth in the UK economy, but this was more than outweighed by an upgrade to economic growth in 2025, higher inflation and higher wages boosting forecast revenues. Underlying forecasts left borrowing just \u00a36 billion higher in 2029-30, driven by higher local authority, welfare, and debt interest spending.<\/p>\n<p>The U-turns on welfare spending cuts announced over the summer were accompanied by a removal of the two-child benefit limit and some cost-of-living measures to reduce energy bills. But the main story of this Budget was the wide array of tax increases scheduled for the later years of this Parliament, which, as shown in Figure 1, reduce borrowing in the last year of the forecast.<\/p>\n<p>These have increased the Chancellor\u2019s \u2018headroom\u2019 against her fiscal targets to \u00a322 billion, leaving the Treasury slightly less exposed to forecast uncertainties next year.<\/p>\n<h4>Figure 1: Public sector net borrowing: changes since March<\/h4>\n<figure id=\"post-2072 media-2072\" class=\"image align-none\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/509\/2025\/11\/Figure-1-Nov-25-Budget-Blog.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/figure>\n<p>For Wales, we expect both the welfare spending increases and the main tax increases to have a disproportionate impact relative to the UK as a whole.<\/p>\n<p>Further front-loaded funding for the Welsh Government budget was also announced, driven mainly by Business Rates measures in England. But despite further good news in the devolved tax forecasts, the UK government\u2019s medium-term spending plans point to a darkening fiscal outlook for the next Senedd term.<\/p>\n<h3>Tax policies<\/h3>\n<p>Overall, this budget increased taxes by \u00a326 billion by 2029-30, a hike which follows hard on the heels of the \u00a332 billion raised at last year\u2019s budget.<\/p>\n<p>The headline tax change announced by the Chancellor was a further three-year extension to the <strong>freeze on personal tax thresholds<\/strong> through to 2030-31. The freeze had been pencilled in to end in April 2028, after which thresholds would again rise in line with inflation. But once the more progressive policy decision to raise income tax rates by 2 percent was reportedly shelved, freezing thresholds became the only means by which the Chancellor could raise sufficient tax receipts without a direct break of Labour\u2019s manifesto commitments to not raise the headline rates of income tax, National Insurance contributions or VAT.<\/p>\n<p>Freezing tax thresholds means that more taxpayers enter the tax system or start paying tax at the 40p or 45p rate bands, a phenomenon known as \u2018fiscal drag\u2019. Had the personal allowance and higher rate threshold been allowed to increase in line with inflation since 2021, they would have been \u00a34,900 and \u00a320,100 higher by 2030-31. The extension to the freeze is expected to raise a further \u00a33.3 billion in 2028-29 and \u00a312 billion by 2030-31.<\/p>\n<p>The fiscal drag effect is relatively stronger for Wales, as a larger proportion of Welsh taxpayers are drawn into the basic, higher and additional bands than for the UK as a whole. Already this year, 65% of Welsh adults will pay income taxes, up from 53% a decade ago, and the share of Welsh adults in higher and additional rate bands has trebled from 1999 (from 3% to 9%).<\/p>\n<p>Our rough estimations suggest that the continued freeze will result in an additional 1.5% of Welsh adults being dragged into the basic rate in 2029, compared with just 0.3% across the UK as a whole.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> We expect the extension of the income tax threshold freeze to disproportionately squeeze Welsh household incomes \u2013 but some of that additional tax raised from households will go to boost the Welsh Government budget (as set out below).<\/p>\n<p>Beyond the big personal tax increases, a range of smaller tax rises were announced. Taxes on <strong>savings, dividends and property incomes<\/strong> were increased by 2 percentage points.<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> National Insurance will also now be charged on <strong>salary-sacrificed pension contributions<\/strong>. The tax rate on <strong>remote gambling<\/strong> was increased from 21 percent to 40 percent, and the rate for online betting was increased from 15 percent to 25 percent from April 2027, measures forecast to raise \u00a31.1 billion per year by 2030-31. There will however be no changes to taxes on in-person gambling and on horseracing, and bingo duty will be entirely abolished from its current 10 percent rate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Electric Vehicles<\/strong> will be taxed for the first time via a mileage charge. <strong>Fuel Duty<\/strong> was frozen yet again, this time for a further five months through to September 2026. The Chancellor has pencilled in inflationary increases in fuel duty rates from April 2027, but the OBR warns of the risks to the forecast, since \u201cpreviously announced increases to fuel duty rates have now been postponed for 16 consecutive years\u201d and \u201cthe total cost of fuel duty freezes from 2010-11 to 2026-27 has risen to \u00a3120 billion\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>For England, the Chancellor announced a <strong>High Value council tax surcharge<\/strong> from 2028. This surcharge will be a flat \u00a32,500 levy on properties worth more than \u00a32 million and \u00a37,500 on properties worth more than \u00a35 million. Revenues will go to central government rather than local government, which might lead to a situation where revenues could boost spending in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, where the tax won\u2019t apply.<\/p>\n<p>The lack of a proper revaluation of all properties in England and the cliff edges created by this new tax leaves a lot to be desired in terms of tax design. From a Welsh policy perspective, this should trigger a conversation ahead of the Senedd election and planned forthcoming revaluation around how to do something more sensible on property taxation in Wales.<\/p>\n<h3>Spending decisions<\/h3>\n<p>The largest policy measure requiring new spending was the removal of the <strong>two-child benefit limit<\/strong>. Given the upfront cost of this policy (\u00a32.3 billion in 2026-27 and \u00a33.0 billion in 2029-30), it had been previously resisted by the Treasury, but the cost effectiveness of the measure in reducing child poverty proved too great to ignore.<\/p>\n<p>Given the recent history of increasing child poverty rates, previously set to be 32 per cent of all children in the UK in 2025-26, a policy that is estimated to lift 450,000 children out of poverty is hugely welcomed.<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a> The Welsh Government estimates that the removal will benefit some 70,000 children in Wales and lead to a three to four percentage point reduction in relative child poverty rates.<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Chancellor also announced a measure to cut <strong>energy bills<\/strong> for households for the next three years, through directly part-funding the domestic share of the Renewables Obligation. This will reportedly save a typical household \u00a3127 next year. However, Wales currently does relatively well out of the Energy Company Obligation spending which is being scrapped, and this may lead to less money being invested in making Welsh homes more energy efficient.<\/p>\n<h3>Implications for the Welsh Government budget<\/h3>\n<p>The headline announcement for the Welsh Government budget was \u00a3508 million of <strong>Barnett consequentials<\/strong> over the current Spending Review period. Of this, \u00a3322 million is for day-to-day spending and \u00a3186 million is for capital spending.<\/p>\n<p>When announcing these Barnett transfers to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland \u2013 and via some apparent banter directed towards the SNP \u2013 the Chancellor implied that the additional funding was being provided for the Scottish Government \u201cbecause Anas Sarwar asked us to\u201d. This was the latest in a long line of utterances by UK ministers that contain misinformation about how the automatic, population-based transfers under the Barnett formula work. What\u2019s also interesting here is that the Chancellor didn\u2019t choose to give Welsh Labour leader Eluned Morgan credit for winning Barnett consequentials alongside her Scottish Labour counterpart.<\/p>\n<h4>Table 1: Autumn Budget 2025 consequentials for the Welsh Government (\u00a3m)<a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\"><strong>[5]<\/strong><\/a><\/h4>\n<table width=\"656\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"332\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">2025-26<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">2026-27<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">2027-28<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">2028-29<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">2029-30<\/td>\n<td width=\"53\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"332\">Resource Block Grant<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">27<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">186<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">114<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">-4<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"53\"><strong>322<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"332\">Capital Block Grant<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">14<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">120<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">50<\/td>\n<td width=\"53\"><strong>186<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"332\">Total<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">27<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">200<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">234<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">-2<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">50<\/td>\n<td width=\"53\"><strong>508<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"7\" width=\"656\"><em>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Of which (based on policy costings document):<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"332\"><em>Business Rates measures in England<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"54\"><em>-2<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"54\"><em>106<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"54\"><em>66<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"54\"><em>42<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"54\"><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"53\"><strong><em>212<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>As usual, no breakdown was provided of what spending measures in England triggered this additional funding for the Welsh Government.<\/p>\n<p>Following the recent pattern, the additional funding is front-loaded (as shown in Table 1). Based on our analysis of the policy scorecard document, it appears most of the resource block grant funding has been triggered by <strong>Business Rates<\/strong> measures in England.<\/p>\n<p>Some <strong>NHS England<\/strong> spending has been brought forward to earlier years, which provides the Welsh Government with some \u00a325 million in both 2025-26 and 2026-27. But this is offset by lower funding from 2028-29 onwards as \u2018savings\u2019 are found in the NHS England budget.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, beyond the current Spending Review period, the UK government has pencilled-in significant reductions to spending, as it aims to find \u2018<strong>efficiencies and savings<\/strong>\u2019 worth \u00a34.9 billion of day-to-day spending in 2030-31.<\/p>\n<p>Putting aside the credibility and feasibility of this spending restraint, these pencilled in reductions in spending has significantly worsened the overall outlook for next Senedd term and the fiscal context for next year\u2019s election.<\/p>\n<p>With real terms growth in day-to-day spending slowing to 0.6% in 2028-29 and 0.5% in 2029-30, this would imply a difficult outlook for the next Welsh Government and cuts to non-priority spending areas.<\/p>\n<h3>Inflation and public sector pay<\/h3>\n<p>More immediately, the Welsh Government\u2019s budget will also be impacted by the updated forecasts for <strong>inflation and pay growth<\/strong> over coming years. The OBR\u2019s forecast for the GDP deflator measure of inflation now stands at 2.2% for 2026-27, some 0.5 percentage points higher than their forecast back in March. Economy-wide average earnings growth is also now set to be around 1 percentage point higher, at 3.2% in 2026-27.<\/p>\n<p>This matters because the Welsh Government\u2019s Draft Budget plans set out inflationary uplifts for each spending area and assumed the public sector pay bill would grow by 2.2% &#8211; leaving an unallocated pot of funding for any deals to get the budget through the Senedd.<\/p>\n<p>The updated forecasts mean that the Welsh Government\u2019s assumed inflationary uplifts are less generous than expected; for example, the planned real terms spending increase for the NHS (before any additional allocations from unallocated funding) is now just 0.3% in real terms. Across the budget, we estimate that providing enough funding for the public sector pay bill to increase by 3.2% instead of 2.2% would require an additional \u00a390 million.<\/p>\n<h3>The Welsh Government\u2019s devolved income tax bonus<\/h3>\n<p>In much better news, the extension of the income tax threshold freeze also has significant implications for the Welsh Government\u2019s budget. The Welsh Government does not have the power to vary income tax thresholds (unlike the Scottish Government), so the UK Government\u2019s freeze applies automatically to Welsh Rates of Income Tax (WRIT). As highlighted in our recent report,\u00a0 A Decade On: Reforming Wales\u2019 Fiscal Framework, <strong>devolved Welsh income tax revenues<\/strong> have been growing more rapidly than the corresponding reductions to the Welsh block grant, primarily because of the fiscal drag effect.<\/p>\n<p>Relative to the OBR\u2019s March 2025 forecasts which informed the Welsh Government\u2019s Draft Budget plans, the updated income tax forecasts provide \u00a349 million more to spend in 2026-27 and \u00a3120 million more in 2028-29 (including projected reconciliations for forecast errors in previous years). This means the improved tax forecasts will boost day-to-day spending over the next four years by more than the consequentials announced yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>The total net effect of tax devolution on the Welsh Government budget next year is set to be \u00a3524 million, over 2% of day-to-day spending. The continued freezing of thresholds means the tax bonus will continue to grow until the end of the decade. The OBR notes devolved Welsh income tax receipts by 2030-31 will be 21.3 per cent higher as a result of frozen income tax thresholds since 2021, compared with 14.3 per cent for equivalent revenues in England and Northern Ireland.<\/p>\n<h4>Figure 2: Net effect of income tax devolution on the Welsh Government budget<\/h4>\n<figure id=\"post-2073 media-2073\" class=\"image align-none\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/509\/2025\/11\/Figure-2-Nov-Budget-Blog.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/figure>\n<h3>Other Welsh-specific announcements<\/h3>\n<p>Most of the Wales-specific announcements had already been briefed before the budget: the decision that Wales should host two <strong>AI growth zones<\/strong>, supported by a \u00a310 million investment in semiconductors, and that <strong>Wylfa<\/strong> had been chosen as the site for the UK\u2019s first Small Modular Nuclear Reactor.<\/p>\n<p>Outside of the main budget speech, the government also made some minor but useful amendments to <strong>Wales\u2019 Fiscal Framework<\/strong> \u2013 specifically relating to the Welsh Government\u2019s ability to borrow and manage its budget. In 2026-27, the Welsh Government\u2019s annual and cumulative capital borrowing limits (\u00a3150 million and \u00a31 billion respectively) will be increased by 10%, then uprated with inflation from 2027-28 onwards. Likewise, the overall limit on the size of the Wales Reserve (\u00a3350 million) and the annual limits for drawing down day-to-day spending (\u00a3125 million) and capital spending (\u00a350 million) will also be increased by 10%, with inflation uprating from 2027-28 onwards. This is a welcome improvement in the position, though falls short of restoring the large inflationary losses to these limits since they were set in cash terms a decade ago.<\/p>\n<h3>Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p>After a turbulent 18 months, the substantial tax increases and larger fiscal headroom should provide greater policy stability and certainty over the next year. But this Budget also implies significant tax increases and spending cuts just before the likely date of the next UK General Election. The largely piecemeal approach to increasing taxes also represents a riskier way of raising additional revenues, as they concentrate losses on smaller groups of taxpayers. The commitment to restore public services within a tight spending envelope will also depend on achieving highly ambitious productivity and efficiency improvements.<\/p>\n<p>For the Welsh Government, updated inflation and pay forecasts make this year\u2019s budget trickier still, notwithstanding the additional consequentials and improved tax forecasts which increase the available funding to be allocated.<\/p>\n<p>Looking further ahead, the backloaded tax increases and worsening outlook for public spending \u2013 if UK government plans are to be believed \u2013 also leave Welsh political parties with much to consider as they finalise manifesto plans ahead of next year\u2019s election.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/microsimulation.pub\/articles\/00231\">Richiardi M, Collado D, Popova D (2021).\u00a0<strong>UKMOD \u2013 A new tax-benefit model for the four nations of the UK<\/strong>. International Journal of Microsimulation, 14(1): 92-101. DOI: 10.34196\/IJM.00231.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> This measure may also affect the Welsh Government\u2019s income tax powers. The new category of property income will apply to the reserved portion of income taxes paid by Welsh taxpayers; but there is an indication that the Welsh Government may be able to set its own rate for property income tax in future.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.resolutionfoundation.org\/publications\/no-half-measures\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">No half measures \u2022 Resolution Foundation<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.wales\/written-statement-first-minister-response-removal-two-child-limit\">https:\/\/www.gov.wales\/written-statement-first-minister-response-removal-two-child-limit<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> Taken from: https:\/\/www.gov.wales\/written-statement-welsh-government-response-uk-autumn-budget-2025<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"By Guto Ifan, Ed Gareth Poole and Owain Cynfab &nbsp; On Wednesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered her second budget, after months of speculation, briefings and uncertainty. The much-trailed worsening of [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1297,"featured_media":2070,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-finance"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8iFWs-xn","meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/509\/2025\/11\/Light_glinting_off_icicles.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1297"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2069"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2084,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2069\/revisions\/2084"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}