Fewer than half of the personal care workforce in Wales are paid the Real Living Wage. And carers in other parts of the UK do not fare much better. The Real Living Wage \u2013 not to be confused with the National Living Wage enshrined in legislation \u2013 is currently set at \u00a39.30 an hour (\u00a310.75 an hour in London). By contrast, the median pay for those working in Welsh care homes is only \u00a38.89 an hour.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In light of the current public health crisis, it seems pertinent to ask whether the current level of remuneration for carers is commensurate with the critical role they play in society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There is certainly room to doubt whether this is currently the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Back in May, the Welsh Government announced a one-off \u00a3500 bonus payment\nfor staff working in social care settings. The First Minister described this\npay award as recognition of an \u201cunder-valued and overlooked\u201d<\/a>\nworkforce. And although there were significant delays in making these payments\n\u2013 which was likely not aided by the composition of the sector, with hundreds of\nemployers and no single pay-determining body \u2013 they\nhave started to be paid out this week<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But even once all eligible workers have received their bonus, the one-off nature of the payment means that it will not address the underlying problems associated with low pay in the sector. These were in place long before this crisis began. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For almost a decade, there has been little improvement in the remuneration of care workers. Having accounted for inflation, median pay has remained stagnant, and has lagged even further behind the Real Living Wages in recent years. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This has, of course, coincided with a period of unprecedently weak\nearnings growth<\/a> \u2013 particularly\nin the public sector. Although low earners were exempt from the\npublic sector pay freeze, the median pay for care home workers remained\nstagnant between 2013 and 2015, which suggests that curbs on public sector pay\n\u2013 even when the lowest paid members of staff are explicitly made exempt \u2013 can\nstill have a detrimental impact on wage growth. And this can also have a\nknock-on effect on wages in the private sector, where most care workers are\nemployed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This\nshould act as a caution to policy-makers intent on making rash decisions to reign in public spending and introduce controls on public\nsector pay during the economic recovery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the reasons why low-pay in the social care sector is so\npernicious is because the issue manifests itself across the earnings\ndistribution. Nearly 70% of workers engaged in residential care activities in\nWales are paid less than \u00a310 an hour. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Earnings are substantially lower than for those engaged in human health activities (including NHS workers) across all percentiles. Of course, the higher levels of pay for NHS workers, especially at the higher percentiles, reflects the long periods of training required to be a specialised medical practitioner. But wages in the residential care sector are still much lower than the service industry average across the earnings distribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The need to address low pay within the sector is made even more urgent by the fact that it has a decidedly unequal impact. We know that around 80% of care workers are women. And previous research commissioned by the UK Women\u2019s Budget Group<\/a> suggests that the UK is an outlier in its relative remuneration of care workers compared to other developed countries. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The prevalence of low pay within the sector has its\nroots in the historical normalisation of caring as unpaid work \u2013 by and large\nperformed by women. Even today, the notion of caring as an activity that\nlargely takes place outside the labour market remains embedded in public\nperception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In one sense, this closely reflects reality. Informal\ncare provided by friends and relatives continues to be by far the largest\nsource of adult care provision. The cost of purchasing this care at market\nprice is estimated at \u00a38 billion \u2013 a similar order of magnitude to the annual\nNHS budget in Wales. <\/p>\n\n\n\n But the pandemic has arguably created a space in public dialogue to reassess the social value of occupations like social care, and how that squares with the price currently paid for labour. It may yet force a rethink on the value of work performed by unpaid carers as well. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Of course, improving the remuneration of care workers would have substantial resource implications. Given the declining value of central government support<\/a> to local authorities over the last decade, addressing this issue would require additional funding to be made available by the Welsh Government. This might involve reallocating existing budget lines, or raising additional revenue through devolved taxes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The pressures of resourcing care for older adults extends beyond the workforce alone \u2013 our report <\/a>takes a closer look at some of these other issues. Needless to say, it seems inevitable that Wales will have to spend more on social care over the next decade. A national conversation about what the future mix of care provision might be, and who should meet this cost is long overdue. Whatever the chosen direction, the remuneration of care workers ought to be a key part of that discussion. <\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/509\/2020\/08\/social_care_pay_logo-2-1024x576.png\"){kind=logo}
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/509\/2020\/08\/ashe_sector2_logo-3-1024x576.png\"){kind=logo}
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/thinking-wales\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/509\/2020\/08\/ashe_sector_logo-3-1024x576.png\"){kind=logo}
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n