100% Certified: How private food standards impact stakeholders, democracy, and Costa Rican forests
12 October 2018
Julianna Horiuchi
Research Assistant, spring 2018
I’m Julianna Horiuchi, an undergraduate student from the U.S. studying Environmental Science and Food Systems at Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts. I joined the Sustainable Places Research Institute (PLACE) as a research assistant for the spring 2018 term, moving to Cardiff for five months to dive headfirst into sustainability research.
Private food certifications like Fairtrade and Rainforest Alliance have emerged as tools to encourage sustainable farming practices, mitigate harmful social and environmental impacts of agriculture, and offer consumers responsibly-produced alternatives to conventional food products. I worked with Dr Angelina Sanderson Bellamy on the CERTAIN project, a body of research examining the social, economic, and ecological impacts of food certification criteria with the ultimate goal of creating a toolkit to evaluate private certifications. My research was twofold: I, one, compiled a literature review exploring food certifications as private governance mechanisms and the implications of such, and two, conducted a spatial analysis examining the ecological impacts of a private certification for banana farms on Costa Rican forests.
Private governance mechanisms have become established fill-ins for government policies in response to rapid globalization of firms and supply chains. I explored the implications of food certification schemes as one of these mechanisms, regulating food safety—and more recently social and environmental impacts—through establishment of private standards and verification by audit. These standards allow retailers to reduce costs and boost reputations, but can make safe and quality food unaffordable for low-income consumers, and exacerbate inequalities between large farmers able to invest in certification requirements and smaller farmers forced into less profitable markets. Private certification schemes also raise questions of democratic legitimacy without state contribution, and operational independence of competing certification bodies, while still maintaining a degree of government dependence. To address concerns of legitimacy and inequality, not only can private standards evolve to incorporate greater producer participation (especially in developing countries), but the role of the state can be expanded in co-regulation, establishing public-private partnerships for more inclusive and democratic governance of an increasingly global agri-food system.
My second study evaluated the effectiveness of one such certification, Rainforest Alliance (RA), in conserving forests in the major banana-producing region of Costa Rica. Through spatial analysis of regional forest gain and loss allocated to closest farm points, tree cover gain and loss were compared in and around RA-certified versus non-certified farms. The study found only tree cover loss through 2012 to be significantly less in RA farms, but with a small effect size and an insignificant difference in tree loss once extended through 2016, and no significant difference in tree cover gain between RA and non-RA farms. Thus, the analysis suggested that in most cases, RA certification for banana farms does not make a significant difference in conserving forests in Costa Rica. That said, further research is needed to account for certification date, farm area, and self-selection. This research indicates a need for further evaluations of certifications like Rainforest Alliance and continued partnerships with the organizations, as well as scientifically-informed amendments to the standards themselves. Furthermore, private food certifications should take a more place-based approach in implementation, utilizing public-private partnerships and producer involvement in decision-making to help localize international standards and increase local ecological benefits, while maintaining consumer trust in their labels.
My placement culminated in two internal papers on these topics and a research presentation as part of the PLACE seminar series. I am grateful to Dr Angelina Sanderson Bellamy and the Sustainable Places Research Institute for providing a welcoming research environment and the opportunity to explore some of today’s most pressing sustainability challenges. Thank you, PLACE!
- The National Food Strategy: rural communities, urban food and good food jobs. What can be done? A Note
- Greening the planet: we can’t just plant trees, we have to restore forests
- Paging Dr Care
- Should we act on climate change? perspectives from global south
- Good work for good food – Call for papers for RGS-IBG Conference 2021
- The Agriculture Bill (Wales) White Paper and the Quest for ‘Sustainable Land Management’: A note on some of the key issues for debate. on
- Outbreaks, break-outs and break-times: Creating caring online workshops on
- Working together for Co-operative and Just Food Systems on
- Regrow Borneo and leadership in the face of the climate crisis on
- Regrow Borneo and leadership in the face of the climate crisis on
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015