I sometimes wonder, in the age of online and offline echochambers and Facebook friendship bubbles, whether we have lost the ancient idea of a critical friend. I am as guilty here as anyone. I mercilessly unfriend people on Facebook whose views I find abhorrent (or even mildly disturbing), rather than engaging with them critically. There are not many Brexiteers left on my Facebook…<\/p>\n
The notion of a \u2018critical friend\u2019 was paramount in Aristotle\u2019s famous friendship theory \u2013 with the true friend being seen not only as a supporter but also a challenger. Otherwise the friendship degenerates into a complacent mutual admiration society. As Cicero (who shamelessly plundered Aristotle\u2019s ideas about friendship) later put it, to \u2018graciously give and receive criticism is the mark of true friendship\u2019. Accepting criticism may even become a catalyst for profound epiphanic self-transformation. To accept, unquestioningly, the friend\u2019s character flaws, without trying to correct them, is not a sign of true friendship but rather its opposite: an attitude that in today\u2019s academic parlance would probably best be referred to as unhealthy \u2018co-dependency\u2019.<\/p>\n
The critical engagement required by true friendship would, by Aristotle\u2019s lights, be guided by a mutual recognition of objective normativity inherent in the world in which we live. While understanding a friend involves understanding that person\u2019s unique self-narrative, it thus also involves understanding that narrative against the background of shared character-relevant values. C. S. Lewis\u2019s old point on how, in painting, friends tend both to look ahead, whereas lovers stare into each other\u2019s eyes, may be seen to represent friendship\u2019s unique commitment to a common moral vision which is not only subjective, and not even relational in a dyadic sense, but lies beyond personal selfhood.<\/p>\n
Speaking of \u2018selfhood\u2019 brings us to Aristotle\u2019s much-cited locution of the friend as \u2018another self\u2019. Debates have raged about whether Aristotle meant this simply as a poetic metaphor (i.e., about being as close as one can be to another person), or whether he was making a psychological claim (about the nature of kindred-spiritedness) or even an ontological one (about selfhood being somehow a relational concept). I will avoid getting embroiled in those exegetical issues in this blog post and just focus on two of the educational implications that Aristotle\u2019s locution is evidently meant to alert us to. To start with, here is the most relevant Aristotelian quotation:<\/p>\n
Now we are not able to see what we are from ourselves [\u2026]; as when we wish to see our own face, we do so by looking into the mirror, in the same way when we wish to know ourselves we can obtain that knowledge by looking at our friend (1213a15\u201322).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Aristotle considered it of paramount interest (e.g. in terms of our potential character growth) that our views about who we are correspond to who we really are \u2018deep down\u2019. However, he realised that we are often lacking in self-transparency and need someone who knows us well to correct our self-conceptions. This is why contemporary neo-Aristotelians are sceptical of self-report instruments to \u2018measure\u2019 character and recommend peer-reports and other more objective measures for triangulation. So the first educational implication to be drawn from Aristotle\u2019s self-theory is that friends are invaluable for self-knowledge in the sense that they (often) know us better than we do ourselves. For example, a friend is likely to notice much earlier than I do that I have lost my zest for life and am sinking into depression. In general, \u2018we are able to observe our neighbours more than ourselves, and to observe their actions more than our own\u2019 (1169b33\u201335).<\/p>\n
However, there is a second and perhaps more controversial implication lurking inside the above citation. Because of the co-ordination and resonance of souls, involved in friendship, Aristotle clearly thinks that I can learn facts about myself \u2013 including my current state of character and its potential for growth \u2013 by looking at how my friends react and act, as their reactions are likely to mirror mine (although the latter will be opaque to my own introspection). So there are actually two reasons for why \u2018the self-sufficing man will require friendship in order to know himself\u2019 (1213a23\u201326).<\/p>\n
I said that the second reason may be more controversial because it seems to assume that we have privileged access to an understanding of other people\u2019s character traits \u2013 when we see those being exercised in action \u2013 that is somehow, in principle, unavailable in the case of our own traits, and that we can identify those viewed traits as being the same as, or different from, our own, although lack of direct self-knowledge prevents us from having immediate access to the self-traits with which we are meant to juxtapose the friend\u2019s traits. Aristotle seems to forget here his own insistence on how good character is individually adjusted to persons\u2019 different temperaments and social situations.<\/p>\n
My qualms over the second of those implications notwithstanding, Aristotle does make a strong case for self-examination being dependent upon other-examination, and self-knowledge upon other-knowledge: in particular the intimate knowledge that the friend has of who I am. We are beings prone to self-deceptions and positive illusions about ourselves. Friends can correct for those, to a certain extent at least, either by direct criticism or simply by being there for us as a \u2018mirror\u2019 to look into.<\/p>\n
To be sure, some of the \u2018mirrors\u2019 that we are forced to look into on Facebook present a distorted view of reality and many of our friends there are not deep friends in the Aristotelian sense. But might we still not learn something about ourselves by looking into them? Shall I count to ten before I unfriend my next Facebook friend \u2013 perhaps?<\/p>\n
Photo by Eberhard Grossgasteiger “My mom and her protectress” on Unsplash<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"I sometimes wonder, in the age of online and offline echochambers and Facebook friendship bubbles, whether we have lost the ancient idea of a critical friend. I am as guilty […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":969,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"On Open For Debate, an excellent post by Kristj\u00e1n Kristj\u00e1nsson on friendship and self-knowledge \"Have we lost the idea of a critical friend?\" @JubileeCentre1","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[242,240,241],"custom_author":[239],"class_list":["post-967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-criticism","tag-friendship","tag-self-knowledge","custom_author-kristjansson-kristjan"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-fB","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1016,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/with-a-little-help-from-our-civic-friends\/","url_meta":{"origin":967,"position":0},"title":"With a little help from our civic friends?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Neboj\u0161a Zeli\u010d\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Ana Gavran Milo\u0161 To speak of friendship in a political context is not particularly appealing for several reasons. First of all, friendship is the kind of relationship we have in our private and intimate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/09\/Neboj%C5%A1a-Zeli%C4%8D-300x200.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2070,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/friendship-and-understanding\/","url_meta":{"origin":967,"position":1},"title":"Friendship and Understanding","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In Nicole Holofcener\u2019s recent film You Hurt My Feelings, an author, Beth, overhears her partner confess to a friend that he thinks her latest book is no good. This revelation comes as a shock to Beth, as Don had previously indicated he liked the book, and a rift opens up\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/08\/Screenshot-2024-05-14-at-18.00.12.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/08\/Screenshot-2024-05-14-at-18.00.12.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/08\/Screenshot-2024-05-14-at-18.00.12.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/08\/Screenshot-2024-05-14-at-18.00.12.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/08\/Screenshot-2024-05-14-at-18.00.12.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/08\/Screenshot-2024-05-14-at-18.00.12.png?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2040,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/truth-fiction-and-llms\/","url_meta":{"origin":967,"position":2},"title":"Truth, fiction and LLMs","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The trope of the working novelist isolated for months at a time, hunched over a desk with yellow stained and repetitively strained fingers clacking away on a keyboard is no more. Today\u2019s author needs only a few spare hours, a title, a vague plot, an internet connection and a subscription\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/06\/janko-ferlic-sfL_QOnmy00-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/06\/janko-ferlic-sfL_QOnmy00-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/06\/janko-ferlic-sfL_QOnmy00-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/06\/janko-ferlic-sfL_QOnmy00-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/06\/janko-ferlic-sfL_QOnmy00-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/06\/janko-ferlic-sfL_QOnmy00-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1756,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/i-hate-cyclists\/","url_meta":{"origin":967,"position":3},"title":"\u201cI hate cyclists!\u201d","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"True story: a friend who works for the NHS had to attend mandatory RESPECT training. The workshop convenor started the day with ice breakers, everyone was invited to say what they liked and disliked. He received answers like teapots, cheese and so on before confessing, \u201cI hate cyclists!\u201d He elaborated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1097,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/why-twitter-is-epistemically-better-than-facebook\/","url_meta":{"origin":967,"position":4},"title":"Why Twitter is (Epistemically) Better Than Facebook","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"January 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Online Environments Social media has the potential to expand our epistemic horizons, connecting us with a wider range of people and more information and analysis than ever before. But it comes with epistemic pitfalls, too. Too much exposure to alternative viewpoints can be overwhelming and lead to bad epistemic outcomes.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/01\/20201016_120730.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/01\/20201016_120730.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/01\/20201016_120730.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/01\/20201016_120730.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/01\/20201016_120730.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2003,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/on-hope-and-despair-part-i\/","url_meta":{"origin":967,"position":5},"title":"On Hope and Despair (Part I)","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"April 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In today\u2019s world, it is not difficult to find something to despair about: Climate change, mass shootings, wars, reproductive rights, racism, social and economic inequality, and politics, just to name a few examples. And many people do in fact despair over these issues. One reason why despair can be such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/07\/eberhard-grossgasteiger-iIFLDQmXPiw-unsplash-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=967"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/967\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":993,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/967\/revisions\/993"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=967"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}