{"id":793,"date":"2019-11-18T10:00:22","date_gmt":"2019-11-18T10:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=793"},"modified":"2019-11-01T15:21:54","modified_gmt":"2019-11-01T15:21:54","slug":"how-to-build-a-safer-internet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-to-build-a-safer-internet\/","title":{"rendered":"How To Build A Safer Internet"},"content":{"rendered":"

Earlier this year, the UK government consulted on an Online Harms White Paper<\/a> that proposes a new model of social media regulation. The response to the consultation was lukewarm at best, and a consistent theme is that the white paper lacks a robust theoretical underpinning. The Carnegie UK Trust<\/a> identify \u201can emphasis on detail\u201d without \u201ca sufficiently clear model of the duty of care\u201d, whilst Article 19<\/a> express concerns that the government fails to \u201cholistically [consider] what framework might be appropriate to regulate digital platforms\u201d. Doteveryone<\/a> describe the report as \u201ca hodge-podge of Codes of Practice and initiatives with neither a clear articulation of what problem the proposals are supposed to solve, nor a clear vision for what alternative future they\u2019re intended to promote\u201d.<\/p>\n

The governments\u2019 plans to \u201censure the UK is the safest place in the world to be online\u201d are hopelessly vague, because we don\u2019t all agree on what it would mean for the internet to be \u2018safe\u2019 – or for it to be \u2018democratic\u2019, \u2018inclusive\u2019, \u2018educational\u2019, or anything else that we might strive for. Does safety mean the ability to express oneself anonymously online, free from fear of offline repercussions, or does it require that everyone be traceable, and accountable for offensive, abusive, or otherwise illegal behaviour? Is it more democratic to allow everyone a voice regardless of what they say, or to restrict the spread of \u2018fake news\u2019 and the opinions of in-expert social media influencers? These are difficult questions, and answering them requires a unified theoretical foundation.<\/p>\n

I am part of a new research project called Norms for the New Public Sphere, which aims to explore philosophical principles which could underlie meaningful, coherent legislation for our online spaces. We have identified three principles which we think are key, and will spend the next two and a half years thinking about how they can and should be balanced. The three principles are as follows:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Epistemic value principle<\/em><\/strong>: A well-constituted public sphere will enable and support knowledge and understanding by institutionalising epistemically valuable practices such as fact-checking, willingness to listen and investigate, openness to criticism, and respect for epistemic peers.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    This principle is a useful starting point for thinking about online harms like misinformation – e.g. the spread of false or misleading claims about climate change or vaccinations. Online platforms might count as violating a duty of care when they incentivise, or profit from, the dissemination of such claims in a way which makes it very difficult for epistemically conscientious participants to attain true or well-grounded beliefs. But the principle can also help us to formulate a positive conception of a well-functioning public sphere – what if platforms instead incentivised the development of critical thinking skills and epistemic virtues?<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Liberal self-government principle<\/em><\/strong>: A well-functioning public sphere will ensure that its members are free to participate as equals in public debate, and only decisions made as a result of such inclusive public deliberation can claim legitimacy as self-government by the people themselves. The public sphere should respect and constitute equal individual rights both to participate freely in public matters \u2013 especially in political debate and deliberation \u2013 and to wider freedom from interference.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      This principle helps to make sense of harms like manipulation, e.g. voters unknowingly targeted with political messaging based on their social media activities. Platforms allowing, or profiting from, this kind of messaging might count as violating a duty of care, as this undermines the legitimacy of supposedly democratic decisions. But again, this principle is can also help us to develop a positive conception of the online public sphere – how could platforms make it easier for everyone to participate freely and on an equal footing?<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Privacy principle<\/em><\/strong>: A well-constituted public sphere must secure an appropriate space for privacy. We take \u2018the private\u2019 to be matters that can justifiably be excluded from the public deliberation and debate that leads to democratic decisions.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        This principle is helpful for thinking about online harms like misuse of data – platforms which don\u2019t create appropriate spaces for privacy, or which reward or profit from invasions of privacy, might be deemed to violate a duty of care. But this principle is also useful for thinking about positive conceptions of a well-functioning public sphere. What kinds of information and communications are properly regarded as \u2018private\u2019, and in what contexts? Are there exceptions to these in important circumstances –\u00a0 such as politicians and public figures, or in cases of whistleblowing?<\/p>\n

        By themselves these principles don\u2019t solve the criticisms raised against the white paper. In fact, they raise more questions than they answer – and that\u2019s just considering them in isolation. Once we consider the ways these principles interact and the possible tensions between them, things become even more complicated. For example, if the self-government principle supports free-expression, does this extend to false or misleading statements which violate the epistemic value principle? And how does the epistemic value principle, which supports the exchange of important information, relate to important privacy-violating truths (e.g. about politicians\u2019 families)? But thinking about these issues – as we will do over the course of our project – is a necessary foundation for any legislation which is supposed to guard against online harms without sacrificing the many benefits of the online public sphere.<\/p>\n

        Norms for the New Public Sphere<\/a> is an AHRC-funded project based at the University of Stirling. The project members are: Rowan Cruft, a political philosopher specialising in rights and duties; Fabienne Peter, a political philosopher who has published extensively on (amongst other things) political and democratic legitimacy; Jonathon Heawood, founding chief executive of independent press regulator IMPRESS; and Natalie Alana Ashton, a feminist epistemologist with interests in relativism. The project has a partnership with Doteveryone<\/a>, a think tank championing responsible tech for a fairer future.<\/p>\n

        For more information or potential collaborations, please contact nataliealanaashton@gmail.com.<\/p>\n

        Picture\u00a0 by @seanmorl<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Earlier this year, the UK government consulted on an Online Harms White Paper that proposes a new model of social media regulation. The response to the consultation was lukewarm at […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":795,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"A new post by@Natalan for Open for Debate: How To Build A Safer Internet","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[36,181,204],"custom_author":[205],"class_list":["post-793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-epistemology","tag-internet","tag-privacy","custom_author-ashton-alana-natalie"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-cN","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2256,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/digital-technology-and-cognitive-scaffolding\/","url_meta":{"origin":793,"position":0},"title":"Digital Technology and Cognitive Scaffolding","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"April 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There is much ambivalence about digital technology. On the one hand, it makes many tasks much more efficient than they would otherwise be. We can do a quick internet search to find a phone number instead of scouring the phone book. We can use GPS instead of trying to figure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/04\/Scaffolding.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/04\/Scaffolding.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/04\/Scaffolding.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/04\/Scaffolding.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1088,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-lies-they-tell-us-facing-up-to-the-uks-ignorance-of-racial-oppression\/","url_meta":{"origin":793,"position":1},"title":"The Lies They Tell Us: Facing Up to the UK\u2019s Ignorance of Racial Oppression","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In May 2019, I travelled to UWE Bristol, to speak at the Critical Theory and Feminism Conference. Having arrived a day before I was scheduled to give my paper, I decided to take advantage of the time on my hands to explore the city \u2013 not least because it was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/12\/u-j-e-s-h-7ySd00IGyx4-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/12\/u-j-e-s-h-7ySd00IGyx4-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/12\/u-j-e-s-h-7ySd00IGyx4-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/12\/u-j-e-s-h-7ySd00IGyx4-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/12\/u-j-e-s-h-7ySd00IGyx4-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/12\/u-j-e-s-h-7ySd00IGyx4-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":685,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/argument-repair\/","url_meta":{"origin":793,"position":2},"title":"Argument Repair","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s easy to blame current problems with public discourse on the brevity of on-line communication. People are moving away from blogs to image exchanges. TLDR. Limited word counts (such as on Twitter) and the combination of immediacy with anonymity lend to verbal fighting. Quick comebacks receive rewards of \u201clikes\u201d and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1459,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-internet-never-forgets-how-google-shapes-and-cements-our-identities\/","url_meta":{"origin":793,"position":3},"title":"The Internet Never Forgets: How Google Shapes and Cements Our Identities","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"I remember sneaking downstairs to use the computer. I was 11, personal computers weren\u2019t really a thing yet. I couldn't use the computers at school because I was afraid a teacher would discover my search history. We had a computer at home, but it was in the hallway. That\u2019s why\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/06\/google.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/06\/google.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/06\/google.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/06\/google.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/06\/google.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/06\/google.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1032,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/online-illusions-of-understanding\/","url_meta":{"origin":793,"position":4},"title":"Online illusions of understanding","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"October 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"An online intellectual paradise? The internet and social media provide us with plenty of opportunities to educate ourselves, to learn new things, and to deepen our understanding. A world of knowledge at your fingertips, as the slogan goes. This might seem like an intellectual paradise. And in many ways, it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1756,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/i-hate-cyclists\/","url_meta":{"origin":793,"position":5},"title":"\u201cI hate cyclists!\u201d","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"True story: a friend who works for the NHS had to attend mandatory RESPECT training. The workshop convenor started the day with ice breakers, everyone was invited to say what they liked and disliked. He received answers like teapots, cheese and so on before confessing, \u201cI hate cyclists!\u201d He elaborated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/11\/blog-header.jpeg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=793"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":801,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793\/revisions\/801"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=793"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}