{"id":742,"date":"2019-10-07T10:00:34","date_gmt":"2019-10-07T09:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=742"},"modified":"2019-10-07T09:53:17","modified_gmt":"2019-10-07T08:53:17","slug":"do-intercultural-citizens-need-to-be-intellectually-humble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/do-intercultural-citizens-need-to-be-intellectually-humble\/","title":{"rendered":"Do intercultural Citizens need to be intellectually humble?"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Manuela Wagner and Michael Byram<\/em>
\n\"\"\"\"<\/figure>\n

\"\"The late Paddy Ashdown, British politician and diplomat, emphasized in 2012 \u201cIn the modern age, where everything is connected to everything, the most important thing about what you can do is what you can do with others.\u201d (2012 https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watchtime_continue=960&v=zuAj2F54bdo<\/a>\u00a0 ). In 2015, 193 world leaders committed to 17 Global Goals for Sustainable Development (UN General Assembly, 2015) as \u201ca plan of action for people, planet and prosperity\u201d (p. 1). Given the many interconnected problems of global proportion, collaborating with people from a variety of backgrounds is necessary for society to thrive, and soon, to survive. However, divisiveness about important issues seems to be the norm in political discourse around the globe in which people talk past each other and not with each other. In this series of blog posts we ponder the question of how educators can contribute to students\u2019 ability to communicate with those from different backgrounds (e.g., in terms of their political orientation, culture, etc.). In particular, we are interested in the development of language education and two concepts we think play a role: intellectual humility and intercultural competence.<\/p>\n

What is \u2018intercultural competence\u2019? In short, individuals who are interculturally competent are those who are able to interact with people from different contexts, and\/or mediate between people of different contexts who are seeking to interact. They interact with others and discover new information and gain knowledge. In order to do so, they are curious, open-minded and tolerate ambiguity. In the end they are able to judge an event based on specific and consciously analysed criteria – rather than prejudiced and thoughtless reaction -, juxtaposing and taking into account other people\u2019s perspectives and their own (for more information, see Byram, 1997, 2008).<\/p>\n

A number of language educators, and more recently educators from other disciplines, have been applying this educational model with students who are able to engage in intercultural dialogue. Students have , for example, worked together with students from another country (or with students from different contexts within the same country) to analyse and resolve a societal problem. When they attempt to resolve a problem in the here and now by taking some action in their community – and not just thinking about it within the classroom –\u00a0 they apply their intercultural competence to act as \u2018intercultural citizens\u2019.<\/p>\n

In an era in which our students are confronted with fake facts and in which it seems easier to either hide in echo chambers or let off steam in shouting matches with \u2018others\u2019, educators might first have to help students interpret and evaluate information in order to gain knowledge. In order to do so, students must admit that there is something they do not know that is they must show some degree of intellectual humility. \u2018Intellectual humility\u2019 is defined as owning the limitations of one\u2019s knowledge, and accepting one\u2019s own intellectual limitations.<\/p>\n

Intellectual humility is not easy. In times in which standardized tests assess what students know and often decide what students can do after they graduate, it would not be surprising if students were reluctant to admit that they \u2018don\u2019t know\u2019. Not knowing in such contexts means being vulnerable. However, we contend that if we do not help our students be(come) curious, ask questions, make and admit mistakes and limitations, ask for help, and give credit for contributions by others, all of which are characteristics of intellectually humble individuals,\u00a0 they cannot be good collaborators and intercultural citizens.<\/p>\n

To look at this from another perspective: If we want our students to engage with each other and communicate across difference, they need to be open to listening to those who have different opinions and different information and they need to be able to judge this information critically. They will only listen to others if they do not feel they already know everything. Intellectual humility and intercultural competence are closely related, as intercultural competence also includes the ability to avoid prejudiced judgements about others by looking critically at one\u2019s own beliefs and values. In terms of intellectual humility this is often referred to as changing one\u2019s views or admitting a mistake. The connections between intercultural competence and intellectual humility thus become evident and there are potential mutual benefits in bringing together theories and practices from work on both.<\/p>\n

One locus of recent work on intercultural competence is at the Council of Europe and its 48 member states. Over the past six years, the Council of Europe has designed its\u00a0 Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture<\/em> (RFCDC) (2018) which can be used by educators to foster students\u2019 skills, attitudes, knowledge and values needed for intercultural dialogue in multilingual and pluricultural societies. The RFCDC provides a means of planning and evaluating the teaching of intercultural and democratic competences in all subjects and in educational institutions as a whole. From our analysis of the role of intellectual humility in intercultural competence, we can say that helping students understand their intellectual limitations will be a significant complement to any endeavor in which we aim to foster intercultural dialogue. This is one example of where insights from work on intellectual humility could benefit work on intercultural competence.<\/p>\n

Cooperation in the opposite direction might come from analysis of approaches to education for intellectual humility. Regardless of how one goes about helping students become more comfortable with the limitations of their knowledge, we feel that it is more important than ever to foster students\u2019 willingness and ability to be curious and ask questions, to listen to those with different perspectives and find solutions collaboratively, ie crucial elements of intercultural competence.<\/p>\n

Focusing on a combination of intercultural competence and intellectual humility seems to be a feasible approach to educate those who can address the challenges we face. In the next blog of this three-blog series, we will take a closer look at the relationship between conviction and intercultural competence in education.<\/p>\n

Picture: Open Gate by the authors<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n