Rising nationalism and nativism around the world generate a toxic brew of arrogance and xenophobia that pits people against one another in often frightening ways. Understanding some discursive mechanisms that undermine our capacities to respond to these forces might help.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
It has become commonplace for people to worry about the normalization<\/em> of disrespect and violence, whether in word or deed.<\/p>\n What exactly is \u201cnormalization\u201d? In data analysis, normalization is about reorganizing one\u2019s data to eliminate redundancy and expose logical connections by putting similar data together. \u00a0In everyday speech, people often mean simply that the behavior is becoming common, and so people are no longer surprised by it. Often, they just let it slide, forget about it, and move on. The ignoring might signal approval, or complicity, or disregard. Ignoring is uninformative.<\/p>\n The danger in the normalization of discrimination and violence is not simply about increasing frequency. A society can have a significantly increased incidence of discrimination and hate crimes without these becoming normal. Numbers matter, but if our end goal is to decrease harm, we must look beyond the numbers and see the norms and practices that are being endorsed, created, or destroyed.<\/p>\n Normalization requires the twin actions of licensing<\/u> and uptake<\/u>. For a new behavior to become a norm, these licenses taken up in use must shift social and discursive practices. Shifting the practices involves not only repetition, but a sense that the changes are rational and justified.<\/p>\n In speaking, we undertake a commitment to what is said and the inferences that can be drawn from it. As Bob Brandom<\/a> has explained, a speaker\u2019s commitment licenses<\/u> audiences to use what the speaker said in a variety of ways, whether repeating, drawing inferences, following up with actions, and more. When Donald says, \u201cThose X-people should be sent back to where they came from,\u201d he has effectively licensed his hearers to repeat his claim, to draw inferences from it, and to rely on those inferences in what they say next. This particular kind of speech act is also action-engendering: it licenses more than speech. It licenses support for deportation, for example. Our speech issues such licenses to re-assert, infer from, and use in new contexts. Each of these subsequent moves can be challenged by other people in the speech situation, but if there is no challenge, all the licenses just hang there like low-hanging fruit, ripe for the picking.<\/p>\n Without hearer uptake<\/u>, a license could just hang in place indefinitely, or it might die on the vine. For new or previously condemned speech, behavior, or attitudes to become normalized\u2014made normal\u2014it must be taken up into the behaviors and attitudes of others. It must spread. \u201cTaking it up\u201d does not require deep understanding; someone hears it, and incorporates into their repertoire of speech and action. They may not fully grasp the power of their words; they may simply enjoy a sense of camaraderie with those who say such things. The speech becomes ready to hand, available for use in a variety of contexts. It becomes an available practice<\/em>, spread from person to person.<\/p>\n Simply ignoring the damaging speech of the demagogue, liar, braggart, or other destructive voice, does not un-license further uses of the speech by that speaker or by others. Ignoring has the virtue of not amplifying, and it allows speakers to move on to other speech. And yet, as Jeremy Wanderer has shown<\/a>, we need to distinguish between ignoring and rejecting. To reject the speech, un-license the attempted license, we need to issue what Brandom has explained as challenges. Challenges are the flip side of commitments.<\/p>\n Challenges are demands for justification, or retraction. When US president Trump tweeted<\/a> that four Congresswomen should \u201cgo back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came,\u201d there was significant outcry. Many people pointed out that they come to Congress from districts in the USA. Three of the four were born here, and one is a naturalized citizen. They are all from<\/em> here. These challenges were multi-faceted; they called him out on \u00a0(1) the facts: they are Americans, (2) the insult:\u00a0 he called their districts \u201ccrime infested\u201d and worse; (3) the racism of his choice of targets, because all are women of color.<\/p>\n The normalization of fear\u2014especially fear of the other\u2014harms our capacity for thoughtful exploration of choices. The normalization of abuse is a tool for inculcating fear. \u00a0The normalization of arrogance promotes resistance to open conversation and shared inquiry. If I think I know it all<\/a>, then I will not need to listen to you. Importantly, if I think I know it all, I also will be ready to act without hesitation. So, normalizing arrogance is a way to break down inhibitions that usually (and helpfully) prohibit extreme reactive actions.<\/p>\n Normalization is also, importantly, about impunity<\/u>. When behaviors that were formerly condemned or even outlawed become commonplace and go without punishment, whether formal or informal, then the process of shifting norms has begun.<\/p>\n When Donald Trump bragged<\/a>, \u201cI could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters,”\u00a0it was appropriate to take it as comment about the loyalty or lunacy of his voters. But even more, this was a claim of impunity. He has not been wrong so far, much to the dismay of those who believe in the inherent dignity of all people. Trump\u2019s crass misogyny<\/a> did not lose him an election, the way one morally compromising photo of 1988 US presidential candidate Gary Hart<\/a> ran him out of politics altogether.<\/p>\n Trump\u2019s bombastic lying<\/a>, which has increased daily, is teaching children<\/a> that lying pays, thus damaging moral norms. As Jacob Levy has pointed ou<\/a>t, Trump\u2019s lies may be less about getting people to believe what he says, and more about getting other people to just repeat him, showing his power over them and amplifying his power across the society. This abuse of power damages epistemic norms.<\/p>\n Practices are key. Identifying and understanding normalization requires paying attention to social practices. If Trump (or any other demagogue) were a simple one-off weirdo, his crass and immoral behavior, his destructiveness would be awful, but would not have the broad social power it does. The strength that comes from numbers in this case lies in the numbers of people bending to his norms, trying to emulate him, and not standing up for the values by which they have lived their lives until now. They give him uptake. Even most of his fans have not lived the way he does or the way he advocates. Most are not phony braggarts, for instance. But being a phony braggart has become more normalized, in that it has become more of a practice in some circles.<\/p>\n Concern about the normalization of explicitly nativist and xenophobic discrimination and violence is a worry about a shift in values. Both moral and epistemic values are at risk when fear and arrogance become common partners. In nations with rising nationalist elements, we much ask whether we are nations that welcome non-citizens to live amongst us and become citizens. Or do we fear the stranger, disdain the immigrant, condemn the asylum seeker? We need to reaffirm the importance of diversity in driving social dynamism as part of what makes us tick.<\/p>\n One might ask: couldn\u2019t we just let bad licenses die on the vine? People concerned with not amplifying harmful behavior advise ignoring it, changing the subject, or simply insisting on facts or inculcating different attitudes and values. These strategies arise from hope that the toxic license will wither and die from lack of uptake. This rarely works. As long as the license hangs there, it can gain active uptake, and be viable.\u00a0 We need direct challenges against harmful licenses for false beliefs, derogating attitudes, or corrupt values. We need to call it out. Proliferating other licenses does not take bad licenses away, and often they are already getting some uptake. That uptake speech issues new licenses, fostering normalization. The positive strategy is important, for while fighting the normalization of harmful behaviors, we still need positive efforts to build better social relations, epistemic practices, and moral norms.<\/p>\n Picture by Lynne Tirrell<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Rising nationalism and nativism around the world generate a toxic brew of arrogance and xenophobia that pits people against one another in often frightening ways. Understanding some discursive mechanisms that […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"\"Normalization\u2014Practices Make It So\" a great post on Open for Debate by Lynne Tirrell on the dangers of normalising violence, disrespect and discrimination","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[132,198,199,7],"custom_author":[197],"class_list":["post-735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-american-politics","tag-discrimination","tag-language","tag-politics","custom_author-tirell-lynne"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-bR","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2047,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/confessions-intersectionality-and-personal-pronouns\/","url_meta":{"origin":735,"position":0},"title":"Confessions, intersectionality and personal pronouns","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the past decade or so, great achievements have been made in the emancipation of genderqueer persons. Not only has there been increased visibility of these individuals in politics and media, but more and more often, practices are instated that aim to include, respect and do justice to genderqueer individuals\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/06\/OpenForDebate_Talbi-_Molteni_Giuseppe_La_confessione_BW.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":618,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/empathetic-understanding-in-politics\/","url_meta":{"origin":735,"position":1},"title":"Empathetic Understanding in Politics","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"What is the goal of political conversation? Why should we deliberate with others about politics? Democratic deliberation is said to benefit people in many ways. For example, it has been touted as a way to produce civic engagement, increase faith in democratic institutions, encourage a willingness to compromise, and make\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/02\/jonathan-sharp-1096746-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/02\/jonathan-sharp-1096746-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/02\/jonathan-sharp-1096746-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/02\/jonathan-sharp-1096746-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/02\/jonathan-sharp-1096746-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/02\/jonathan-sharp-1096746-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1625,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/truth-and-the-facebookians\/","url_meta":{"origin":735,"position":2},"title":"Truth and the Facebookians","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Imagine a community\u2014call them the \u201cFacebookians\u201d\u2014whose politics is deeply polarized. Their political discourse reflects this divisiveness, but to a very unusual extent. For in making political claims, Facebookians are guided by just one rule: only say (or post) what is liked by your friends and which you are willing defend\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Neon sign with zero \"likes\"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2197,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/data-figleaves-statistics-and-their-power-to-conceal-racism\/","url_meta":{"origin":735,"position":3},"title":"Data Figleaves: Statistics and their Power to Conceal Racism","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"If you have followed the 2024 US election coverage, you have likely come across the term \u201cmigrant crime\u201d. A term coined by Donald Trump to refer to an alleged crime wave spurred by Joe Biden\u2019s border policy. Conservative media outlets, like Fox News, were quick to echo Trump\u2019s claims, often\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/02\/pexels-jakubzerdzicki-17284804-2-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/02\/pexels-jakubzerdzicki-17284804-2-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/02\/pexels-jakubzerdzicki-17284804-2-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/02\/pexels-jakubzerdzicki-17284804-2-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/02\/pexels-jakubzerdzicki-17284804-2-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/02\/pexels-jakubzerdzicki-17284804-2-2.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2316,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/what-does-equity-look-like-when-we-take-a-broader-perspective-of-open-science\/","url_meta":{"origin":735,"position":4},"title":"What does equity look like when we take a broader perspective of Open Science?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Figure 1 - A summary of the overall pillars of the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. In 2021, the 193 member states signed the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. In this text Open Science was defined as \u201ca set of principles and practices that aim to make scientific research from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":567,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/lyrical-politics-reflections-on-the-role-of-grief-in-political-life\/","url_meta":{"origin":735,"position":5},"title":"Lyrical Politics: Reflections on the Role of Grief in Political Life","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s said that Mamie Till Mobley helped to catalyze the civil rights movement. When people say this what they have in mind, principally, is her decision to present her son\u2019s lynched body in public. Sometimes though her influence is tacit and the catalyst becomes the verdict to acquit the two\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/12\/Mamie-Till-Mobley.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/12\/Mamie-Till-Mobley.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/12\/Mamie-Till-Mobley.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/12\/Mamie-Till-Mobley.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/09\/lowhangingfruit_54c6-scaled.jpeg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/735","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=735"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/735\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":739,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/735\/revisions\/739"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=735"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}