{"id":724,"date":"2019-08-26T10:00:57","date_gmt":"2019-08-26T09:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=724"},"modified":"2019-08-08T17:51:29","modified_gmt":"2019-08-08T16:51:29","slug":"how-to-vote-well","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-to-vote-well\/","title":{"rendered":"How to vote well"},"content":{"rendered":"

It seems elections are everywhere at the moment. Following on the heels of EU elections that for the first time saw turnout increase, the US is gearing up for a Democratic primary packed with candidates and, eventually, for a Presidential election. Meanwhile, the UK is bracing for the possibility of a general election, if the current government is unable to form a coherent view on Brexit that will command the support of Parliament. All of which raises the question: what\u2019s a voter to do?<\/p>\n

The first thing to do is appreciate the stakes: how each of us votes determines in aggregate the very rules we have to live by, and as such have far-reaching implications for voters and non-voters alike. So those who vote owe it to everyone else to vote well.<\/p>\n

At a minimum, this means not voting on the basis ignorance<\/em> about the nature and implications of the political policies involved. And if the past decades of research on public opinion has shown anything, it is that political ignorance is widespread. As Scott Althaus notes, \u2018If ignorance is bliss, then the pursuit of happiness seems alive and well in American society\u2019\u2014and, unfortunately, the Americans aren\u2019t outliers here.<\/p>\n

Of course, in any relatively large electorate, any given vote won\u2019t make that big of a difference. That\u2019s why some political scientists have suggested that voters are rationally<\/em> ignorant. But what\u2019s individually rational might still be irrational for the group. My not recycling won\u2019t ruin the environment, but it doesn\u2019t follow that I\u2019m not obligated to recycle\u2014and something similar goes for ignorant voting. Such voting is a \u2018collectively harmful activity,\u2019 as Jason Brennan puts it.<\/p>\n

So your obligation to others to vote well stands. But what I want to do now is point to an additional<\/em> reason that you ought to vote well. You would let yourself<\/em> down by engaging in ignorant voting, quite independently of whether (large-scale) ignorant voting might also be bad for others.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s why. The choices you make depend on what you know<\/em>. In particular, not<\/em> knowing relevant information can have you endorse options you would have rejected, had you known all of the relevant facts. Consider an example. Say I get to pick between two environmental policies, A and B. A is great for the environment, B is terrible for the environment. But I have it the wrong way around so, while I care deeply about the environment, I end up picking B over A.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a question: do I prefer<\/em> B over A? No. As Robert Goodin points out, under circumstances of ignorance, \u2018we can serve a person\u2019s \u201creal\u201d preferences only by censoring the misleading indication of his preferences that is revealed in his choices\u2019. So, the fact that I chose<\/em> B shouldn\u2019t lead us to think I want it, given that I\u2019m mistaken on the facts.<\/p>\n

Indeed, there\u2019s a general philosophical lesson in this: my true preferences are given by what I would have preferred, had I had all of the relevant information. Differently put, my true preferences are my fully informed<\/em> preferences.<\/p>\n

This also tells me something about how I should vote, in so far as I want to vote in accordance with my (true) preferences. I should vote the way I would\u2019ve voted, were I fully informed<\/em>. By doing that, I minimise the effect of ignorance on my voting, and to that extent vote well\u2014or at least better than I otherwise likely would have.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s take stock. You have two reasons to vote well\u2014you owe it to others, and you owe it to yourself\u2014and the way to do it is to vote the way you would\u2019ve voted, were you fully informed. But how do I know how I would\u2019ve voted under these circumstances?<\/p>\n

It might be thought the answer is obvious: inform yourself! The problem is that it\u2019s really difficult and time-consuming to do so, and trying by no means guarantees succeeding.<\/p>\n

So this is where I have good news for you: you don\u2019t need to. We can estimate how you likely would have voted, were you fully informed, through statistical modelling. If you\u2019re a UK voter, you can try it yourself here:<\/p>\n

https:\/\/ahlstromvij.shinyapps.io\/informed_vote\/<\/a><\/p>\n

How does this work? Models like these operate on large sets of survey data that enable us to identify the relationship between demographic information and voter preferences, as reported in a context where participants also answer a number of civic test questions about political matters. On the basis of that data, we can then estimate what preferences people of particular demographic profiles would likely have reported, were we to hold everything about them constant, but increase their score on the civic test to the maximum<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Why think that scoring high on such a test means being informed? Here are two reasons:<\/p>\n

First, these tests typically concern matters such as the holders of key political positions, and the basics of the political platforms of the main political parties, all of which would seem crucial to making anything resembling informed political choices.<\/p>\n

Second, to the extent that the tests concern more esoteric matters, knowing the answer to such questions is likely correlated with knowing a great many other things that are directly relevant to making wise political choices. For example, someone who knows the names of several foreign leaders, or of obscure legislative procedures, will likely know these things, not as a matter of isolated pieces of trivia, but on account of knowing a great deal about the political world.<\/p>\n

How do we know that these models are accurate in terms of their estimates? As George Box famously pointed out, all models are wrong, but some are useful. And in the case of these models, their utility becomes clear when we survey the options we\u2019re faced with when trying to vote well.<\/p>\n

As already noted, we can try to inform ourselves on large amounts of political issues and facts\u2014but in addition to being time-consuming, it also doesn\u2019t guarantee that we succeed even if we invest the time. So for most of us, this is simply not a viable option.<\/p>\n

By contrast, models of the kind introduced above in effect provide a low-cost tool for learning how an informed version of you likely would\u2019ve voted, and you\u2019d be wise to factor that into your voting choice. If I\u2019m right, you not only owe it to others to do so; you owe it to yourself as well.<\/p>\n

Photograph by Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It seems elections are everywhere at the moment. Following on the heels of EU elections that for the first time saw turnout increase, the US is gearing up for a […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":726,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"\"How to vote well\" a great post by Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij on Open for Debate. If you live in the UK try the model for yourself","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[71,7,193,192],"custom_author":[191],"class_list":["post-724","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-democracy","tag-politics","tag-rationality","tag-voting","custom_author-ahlstrom-vij-kristoffer"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-bG","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1080,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/not-so-ignorant-after-all-metaknowledge-matters-more-than-knowledge\/","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":0},"title":"Not so Ignorant After All: Metaknowledge Matters More than Knowledge","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In one way or another, democracies put political power in the hands of the people.\u00a0 A perennial worry about democracy, voiced almost as soon as it was invented, is that it places power in the hands of the ignorant. To some extent, this worry reflects an elitist condescension, but there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/12\/vote.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":249,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/good-democracy-needs-good-questions\/","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":1},"title":"Good Democracy Needs Good Questions","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf you were president, what would you do about Syria and the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo?\u201d This question was asked to both candidates at the second U.S. presidential debate, during the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. As per the \u2018town-hall\u2019 format of the debate, the question was asked by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Changing Attitudes"","block_context":{"text":"Changing Attitudes","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/changing-attitudes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/09\/questions.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/09\/questions.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/09\/questions.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":856,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/which-crisis-of-trust\/","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":2},"title":"Which crisis of trust?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The UK Labour Party\u2019s leadership contest is well underway after heavy defeat in the 2019 General Election. There is nothing close to consensus within the Party about why things went wrong, and still very little agreement on the most high-profile political issues. Members could be forgiven, then, for taking solace\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2281,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-distant-can-conspiracy-theories-be-from-democracy\/","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":3},"title":"How distant can conspiracy theories be from democracy?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Imagine you are the leader of a democratic, liberal, prestigious, \u201cold\u201d party in a Western democracy of our time. We might bet that, if you held such a position, the burden of responsibility would feel particularly heavy on your shoulders: a significant portion of your former voters is flying to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/06\/clark-young-Qtbx4j4UjRg-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/06\/clark-young-Qtbx4j4UjRg-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/06\/clark-young-Qtbx4j4UjRg-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/06\/clark-young-Qtbx4j4UjRg-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/06\/clark-young-Qtbx4j4UjRg-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/06\/clark-young-Qtbx4j4UjRg-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":386,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/explaining-the-puzzle-of-national-shame\/","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":4},"title":"Explaining the puzzle of national shame","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"In the aftermath of the EU Referendum, I encountered many people who said to me, \u201cI am ashamed to be British\u201d, or, when confronted with the fallout of the referendum such as the lack of diplomacy exhibited by David Davis, May\u2019s use of EU citizen rights as bargaining chips, or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/flag2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/flag2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/flag2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/flag2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2113,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/values-and-virtues-in-philosophy-and-psychology\/","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":5},"title":"Values and Virtues in Philosophy and Psychology","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"During the recent general election campaign in the UK, I received a flyer through my door from a local independent candidate who claimed to value, among other things, humanitarianism. He also wanted to repurpose the entirety of the UK\u2019s foreign aid budget to fix potholes on Britain\u2019s apparently neglected roads.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Puddle on the ground reflecting a plane in the sky","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/09\/mirror.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/09\/mirror.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/09\/mirror.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/09\/mirror.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/08\/Kristoffer_coast.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=724"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/724\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":727,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/724\/revisions\/727"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/726"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=724"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}