{"id":584,"date":"2019-01-14T10:00:20","date_gmt":"2019-01-14T10:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=584"},"modified":"2019-01-12T09:44:22","modified_gmt":"2019-01-12T09:44:22","slug":"public-debates-testing-your-intellectual-abilities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/public-debates-testing-your-intellectual-abilities\/","title":{"rendered":"Public Debates \u2013 Testing your Intellectual Abilities?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Engaging in public debate can be a scary thing.\u00a0 You make yourself vulnerable to criticism when you express your views in public \u2013 risking a critique not only of the specific beliefs you endorse, but also of your intellectual abilities more broadly.\u00a0 How might you respond to such critiques?\u00a0 Are you open to the possibility that you might have made mistakes in your reasoning?\u00a0 Do you view that possibility as inherently threatening to your intellectual abilities, or do you view it as a potential opportunity to learn and sharpen your intellectual skills?<\/p>\n

In a previous post<\/a>, I focused on debates that had moral content to them, but I also think that any public debate has the potential for an explicit, or implicit, critique of one\u2019s intelligence and intellectual skills (or epistemic virtues), and regardless of the specific content of the beliefs.\u00a0 This might also be threatening to one\u2019s identity, not in the sense of one\u2019s moral identity, but rather in one\u2019s intellectual identity.<\/p>\n

Other work done on views of intelligence and responses to critique is relevant here, specifically Carol Dweck\u2019s work on intelligence.\u00a0 Dweck\u2019s work on intelligence, amongst other abilities, shows that people fall broadly into two camps with respect to how they view abilities \u2013 it is either a fixed entity that you cannot do much to change, or it is malleable such that you can train to improve it.[1]<\/a>\u00a0 These two mindsets, \u2018fixed\u2019 versus \u2018growth\u2019, have consequences for what goals we set ourselves \u2013 performance goals that demonstrate (to others or ourselves) we have the level of ability (e.g. intelligence) we take ourselves to have; versus learning goals where we strive to improve our ability and thus take on challenges.\u00a0 With fixed mindsets and performance goals, ultimately the goal is that one wants to be judged positively and avoid being judged negatively.\u00a0 In respect to public debates, that would presumably translate into being motivated to defend one\u2019s initial position, rather than being open to changing one\u2019s views, in order to avoid being seen as wrong (and thus perhaps indicating a lack of intelligence).<\/p>\n

The two mindsets also have different consequences for how we react to failure.\u00a0 A fixed mindset leads to maladaptive responses because of feelings of helplessness to do better (e.g. frustration because one just isn\u2019t smart enough); whereas a growth mindset leads to adaptive responses where a person puts forth effort to learn how to act better the next time (e.g. recognizing that they made a mistake, but also that they can put effort into improving and succeeding later).[2]<\/a><\/p>\n

So what kind of mindset you have depends more on these two factors of goals and responses to failure, than on your stated beliefs.\u00a0 Mindset beliefs have been shown to be domain specific, so people could have different views of different abilities.\u00a0 But in the educational context, it looks like those who have a malleable view of their own intelligence achieve much better learning outcomes, because they seek goals challenging them to learn and because they have more adaptive responses to failure.\u00a0 Likely when it comes to defensiveness in public discourse, and whether people are truly open to learning from others, one factor that can affect this is one\u2019s views about intelligence.<\/p>\n

Notice that this distinction in mindsets ties in well with the two senses of shame discussed in my previous article.\u00a0 The two senses of self-shame had these same sorts of patterns with regard to adaptive and maladaptive responses to moral failure, in terms of motivating either self-improvement or defensiveness.\u00a0 The first sense of shame was so distressing because it seems to be something one cannot fix, leading to feelings of inferiority and defensiveness.\u00a0 For example, Dweck and Leggett found in their studies on children\u2019s responses to intellectual challenges and failures, that:<\/p>\n

helpless children viewed their difficulties as failures, as indicative of low ability, and as insurmountable. They appeared to view further effort as futile and, perhaps, as their defensive maneuvers suggest, as further documentation of their inadequate ability.[3]<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is strikingly similar to Gausel and Leach\u2019s descriptions of reactions to felt inferiority, which involve maladaptive responses that are also characteristic of having a fixed rather than malleable mindset.[4]<\/a> The second sense of shame, by contrast, was not experienced as so distressing, because although there is a failure, it is something one can work on improving.<\/p>\n

Insofar as people can approach public debates as an opportunity to learn something new, this should help to prevent people from viewing a public debate as a referendum on whether one is intelligent or not (and thus a potential threat to their self-esteem).\u00a0 Otherwise, fixed mindsets regarding one\u2019s intellectual abilities are likely to prompt defensive reactions that are linked to being resistant to change, as well as being biased in processing new information.\u00a0 In order to foster more effective public debates, these defensive reactions need to be curbed.[5]<\/a>\u00a0 This is another area where self-affirmation techniques, which I discussed previously, such as writing about a value that is important to yourself, may also be of value.[6]<\/a>\u00a0 People can be more open to accepting information that challenges their existing beliefs, and perhaps their intellectual abilities, after having another important aspect of their identity affirmed.<\/p>\n

Image from Pixabay<\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> Dweck, Carol S. and Leggett, Ellen L. (1988) “A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality”, Psychological Review<\/em> 95 (2), 256-273.\u00a0 Mindsets are also referred to as implicit theories, in which case the contrast is between \u2018entity\u2019 (i.e. fixed) and \u2018incremental\u2019 (i.e. malleable) theories.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> It should be noted that these mindsets are domain specific \u2013 people can have fixed mindsets about some abilities, and malleable mindsets about others.<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> Dweck, Carol S. and Leggett, Ellen L. (1988) “A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality”, Psychological Review<\/em> 95 (2), 256-273, 258.<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Gausel, L., & Leach, C. W. (2011). Concern for self-image and social image in the management of moral failure: Rethinking shame. European Journal of Social Psychology<\/em>, 41(4), 468-478.<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> Sherman, David K. and Cohen, Geoffrey L. (2002) “Accepting Threatening Information: Self-Affirmation and the Reduction of Defensive Biases”, Current Directions in Psychological Science <\/em>11 (4), 119-123.<\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> Sherman, D.K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory.\u00a0 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology<\/em>, 38, 183-242.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Engaging in public debate can be a scary thing.\u00a0 You make yourself vulnerable to criticism when you express your views in public \u2013 risking a critique not only of the […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":593,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[5,134,25,119],"custom_author":[133],"class_list":["post-584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-debate","tag-self-affirmation","tag-self-esteem","tag-shame","custom_author-stichter-matt"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-9q","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1703,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/reflection-on-values-makes-conversations-more-fruitful\/","url_meta":{"origin":584,"position":0},"title":"Reflection on values makes conversations more fruitful","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"People often find it difficult to listen to the views of those with whom they disagree. For example, in the UK, oftentimes members of the same family consciously shun discussions of controversial topics such as Brexit. In the USA, Democrats and Republicans are equally motivated to avoid engaging with each\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/pointing-6043176_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/pointing-6043176_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/pointing-6043176_1280.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/pointing-6043176_1280.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/pointing-6043176_1280.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":596,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/intellectual-humility-from-views-of-knowledge-to-views-of-people\/","url_meta":{"origin":584,"position":1},"title":"Intellectual humility: from views of knowledge to views of people","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"January 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Researchers have taken a number of approaches to defining intellectual humility. I tend to view intellectual humility as rooted in a healthy independence between intellect and ego (Krumrei-Mancuso & Rouse, 2016). What I mean by this is that intellectual humility involves accepting one's intellectual fallibility without experiencing it as a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":900,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/being-an-intellectually-dependable-person\/","url_meta":{"origin":584,"position":2},"title":"Being an Intellectually Dependable Person","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"We are often at the mercy of others when we are trying to figure things out. The same is true when we are seeking to gain deeper understanding or to improve our skills for gaining knowledge.\u00a0 Others can share their perspectives with us. They can point us toward relevant evidence.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/05\/26163029653_94251f8c68_c.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/05\/26163029653_94251f8c68_c.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/05\/26163029653_94251f8c68_c.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/05\/26163029653_94251f8c68_c.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/can-exposure-to-fake-news-damage-our-intellectual-character\/","url_meta":{"origin":584,"position":3},"title":"Can Exposure to \u201cFake News\u201d Damage Our Intellectual Character?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"January 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"There is no denying the current widespread interest in the phenomenon of \u201cfake news\u201d. Reflection on the quality of recent political debates has fuelled concerns about the use of inaccurate and misleading stories and statistics. In response, politicians have begun proposing legislation to combat the spread of misleading information, while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2119,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-should-we-live-our-intellectual-lives\/","url_meta":{"origin":584,"position":4},"title":"How should we lead our intellectual lives?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"October 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This question has long preoccupied philosophers, but has recently taken on greater public urgency in response to fears about misinformation, disinformation, bullshit, tribalism, and other perceived epistemic threats. One answer to this question is that we should live our intellectual lives the same way we should live our ethical lives:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/10\/Open-for-Debate-image_beehive_Bland.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/10\/Open-for-Debate-image_beehive_Bland.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/10\/Open-for-Debate-image_beehive_Bland.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/10\/Open-for-Debate-image_beehive_Bland.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/10\/Open-for-Debate-image_beehive_Bland.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1481,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/is-being-resilient-an-unfair-burden\/","url_meta":{"origin":584,"position":5},"title":"Is being resilient an unfair burden?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Navigating the world of public debate can be a difficult task. There are many hurdles to overcome in the process of finding out about and sharing one\u2019s views on social and political issues. There is the long and difficult task of sorting through the mass of available information in search\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands-220163_1280.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=584"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/584\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":595,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/584\/revisions\/595"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=584"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}