{"id":327,"date":"2018-01-01T09:00:46","date_gmt":"2018-01-01T09:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=327"},"modified":"2017-12-28T17:51:04","modified_gmt":"2017-12-28T17:51:04","slug":"how-to-find-wisdom-in-a-divided-society","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-to-find-wisdom-in-a-divided-society\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Find Wisdom in a Divided Society"},"content":{"rendered":"

[snippet id=”325″ label=”Igor and Alex”]<\/p>\n

It is not a debate that political division in the U.S., UK and many other European countries is at an all-time high. In the U.S., disagreement on the topics of race, national security, and environmental regulations\u2014just to name a few\u2014have increased during the Obama administration, and have continued to grow<\/a>\u00a0to record levels during President Trump\u2019s first year in office. To make matters worse, we live in an age where news outlets thrive on reporting contention, leaving us entrenched in a system where one would be hard-pressed to avoid exposure to political discord and polarization. It is times like this where someone might be inclined to ask themselves how they can try to learn and grow from current political events, to face this political division and walk away from it a little bit wiser. For those of us looking to keep an open-mind, empathize, and reconcile different perspectives, the answer is not likely an easy one. Fortunately, the past few decades of psychological research have offered some valuable insight on how we might begin to cultivate wisdom in the midst of the great political divide we are living in right now.<\/p>\n

Although the term wisdom carries various definitions and connotations throughout its history, psychologists recently define wisdom<\/a>\u00a0 as the ability to reflect on social issues and express humility, acknowledge others\u2019 perspectives, recognize uncertainty, and seek compromise. What makes political polarization such a challenge for wisdom is that political disagreements are often founded\u2014or feel as if they are founded on\u2014our fundamental core values, blocking off the need or even desire to consider others\u2019 perspectives. This is a large stumbling block in the path to wise forms of thinking, preventing people from perspective-taking and compromising their opinions. One of the keys to finding wisdom lies in the ability to first recognize that we are often flawed and biased individuals, and to realize that we are often more invested in our opinions and perspectives than we probably realize. Only once we begin to recognize this in ourselves, can we start to have a constructive discussion with others who disagree with us. To reach this point, psychology offers some evidence-based strategies to help people approach divisive social issues in a wiser manner. Below we highlight a few strategies people can take:<\/p>\n

The power of situation. <\/strong>One of the strategies that has received robust evidence-based support<\/a>\u00a0(also see here<\/a>) involves creating a social environment in which one is more likely to focus on others as compared to an environment in which one is more likely to exclusively focus on the self. For instance, people are more likely to reason wisely about interpersonal transgressions such as infidelity or trust betrayal if these scenarios involve their friends rather than them personally. Similarly<\/a>, people report a greater ability to reason wisely about situations when surrounded by friends and family members rather than situations in which they were surrounded by strangers or were alone. Using these insights, one strategy may be to shape one\u2019s environment in situations when wisdom is needed. That is, when needing a boost in wisdom, ensure that the decisions are not made in isolation and ideally draw on recommendations provided by others.<\/p>\n

Ego-decentering<\/strong>. Some recent work has also explored how to boost wisdom in contexts where opinions on social issues such as political topics become too personal. One strategy that has shown particular promise involves the use of mental techniques to promote visual<\/a>, temporal<\/a>, or linguistic<\/a>\u00a0distance from the self. Instead of placing one\u2019s personal opinions and needs (one\u2019s ego<\/em>) in the center, these techniques promote a form of decentering, enabling the person to see the bigger picture. For instance, some research finds that when people use a \u201cthird-person\u201d self-talk technique, reflecting on a serious social issue by using pronouns he\/she and their own name, as opposed to a first-person perspective, using pronouns such as me\/mine, resulted in reasoning more closely aligned with wisdom\u2014e.g., greater open-mindedness and willingness to compromise.<\/p>\n

Generative Motivations. <\/strong>Another intriguing strategy derives from the concept of generativity\u2014i.e., a concern for teaching and guiding future generations. Although the validity of generative motivations\u2019 relationship to wisdom is still being empirically investigated, initial work<\/a>\u00a0starts to explore conditions under which these concepts may be linked. For instance, some experiments we have conducted show that explaining politically polarizing issues to someone unfamiliar with the topic leads people to express greater generativity (i.e., willingness to teach less knowledgeable people), as well as greater likelihood of expressing humility and acknowledge multiple perspectives. Notably, generative motivations can be harmful and not lead to wise reasoning if the person is invested in their viewpoint. Therefore, the process of teaching and guiding others may be most beneficial for wisdom when done in a way that preserves the complexities and multiple perspectives that accompany divisive social topics.<\/p>\n

Wisdom does not come easily. During times of high political division, it is often easier to simply ignore or silence those who disagree with us, surrounding ourselves with like-minded individuals. However, we need to recognize the importance of remaining humble. We need to challenge our own views and perspectives by considering what others are thinking, and reflect on why they think the way they do and seek out compromise. The strategies we outline here can help people implement wiser approaches to thinking about contentious political issues as well as in their lives. As we continue to pass the torch to future generations, the success and well-being of our society hinges on our ability to adopt a wiser approach today, learning to manage and deal with the jarring nature of political disagreement and dissent.<\/p>\n

Public Domain Image Oriental Theatre (1969) courtesy of\u00a0Historic American Buildings Survey images of Oregon<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It is not a debate that political division in the U.S., UK and many other European countries is at an all-time high. In the U.S., disagreement on the topics of […]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":354,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[110,112,111,35,67,8,113,59,109,108],"custom_author":[105,104],"class_list":["post-327","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-compromise","tag-disagreement","tag-distancing","tag-humility","tag-intellectual-humility","tag-polarization","tag-reasoning","tag-virtue","tag-well-being","tag-wisdom","custom_author-huynh-alex","custom_author-grossmann-igor"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-5h","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":679,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/what-polarization-does-to-us\/","url_meta":{"origin":327,"position":0},"title":"What Polarization Does to Us","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Commentators from across the political spectrum warn us that extreme partisan polarization is dissolving all bases for political cooperation, thereby undermining our democracy.\u00a0 The near total consensus on this point is suspicious.\u00a0 A recent Pew study finds that although citizens want politicians to compromise more, they tend to blame only\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/blindfold.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/blindfold.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/blindfold.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/blindfold.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/blindfold.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/blindfold.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":21,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/open-for-debate\/","url_meta":{"origin":327,"position":1},"title":"We are now open for debate","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Welcome to 'Open for Debate', a blog associated with the project Changing Attitudes in Public Discourse.\u00a0We hope to use this space to debate all aspects and forms of debate. Ultimately, we would like to develop together, in the spirit of collaboration, some suggestions to improve the quality of discussions in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/ruminating-on-fake-news-online-education-and-intellectual-humility\/","url_meta":{"origin":327,"position":2},"title":"Ruminating on Fake News, Online Education, and Intellectual Humility","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"From 2015 until last month (May, 2018), I was involved with a project at the University of Edinburgh, which aimed to produce a massive open online course (or MOOC) on intellectual humility. One of the central goals of the project was to give various academics who are producing extremely valuable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2169,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-affective-in-affective-polarization\/","url_meta":{"origin":327,"position":3},"title":"The \u201caffective\u201d in affective polarization","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Public opinion in many contemporary democracies shows increasing signs of polarization. In particular, animosity and dislike across political lines have become increasingly characteristic of Western mass publics (Boxell et al., 2024; Finkel et al., 2020; Wagner, 2024). Several empirical methodologies designed to measure citizens\u2019 opinions, which include questions about their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/affective1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/affective1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/affective1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/affective1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":596,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/intellectual-humility-from-views-of-knowledge-to-views-of-people\/","url_meta":{"origin":327,"position":4},"title":"Intellectual humility: from views of knowledge to views of people","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"January 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Researchers have taken a number of approaches to defining intellectual humility. I tend to view intellectual humility as rooted in a healthy independence between intellect and ego (Krumrei-Mancuso & Rouse, 2016). What I mean by this is that intellectual humility involves accepting one's intellectual fallibility without experiencing it as a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":408,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/intellectual-humility-and-conviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":327,"position":5},"title":"Intellectual Humility and Conviction","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"March 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is a puzzle. On the one hand, we laud people in public life for their conviction, for sticking to their principles come what may. Indeed, we take to be crucial to someone\u2019s authenticity. On the other hand, however, don\u2019t we also think that it is important that those in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/Civil_Rights_March_on_Washington_D.C._Dr._Martin_Luther_King_Jr._and_Mathew_Ahmann_in_a_crowd._-_NARA_-_542015_-_Restoration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/Civil_Rights_March_on_Washington_D.C._Dr._Martin_Luther_King_Jr._and_Mathew_Ahmann_in_a_crowd._-_NARA_-_542015_-_Restoration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/Civil_Rights_March_on_Washington_D.C._Dr._Martin_Luther_King_Jr._and_Mathew_Ahmann_in_a_crowd._-_NARA_-_542015_-_Restoration.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/Civil_Rights_March_on_Washington_D.C._Dr._Martin_Luther_King_Jr._and_Mathew_Ahmann_in_a_crowd._-_NARA_-_542015_-_Restoration.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/Civil_Rights_March_on_Washington_D.C._Dr._Martin_Luther_King_Jr._and_Mathew_Ahmann_in_a_crowd._-_NARA_-_542015_-_Restoration.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/02\/Civil_Rights_March_on_Washington_D.C._Dr._Martin_Luther_King_Jr._and_Mathew_Ahmann_in_a_crowd._-_NARA_-_542015_-_Restoration.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/Oriental_Theatre_from_balcony_-_Portland_Oregon2-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":345,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327\/revisions\/345"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}