In the aftermath of the Dallas shootings on July 7, 2016, Hillary Clinton said: \u201cWe need to try as best we can to walk in one another\u2019s\u00a0shoes, to imagine what it would feel like if people followed us around stores or locked their car doors when we walked past.\u201d Clinton was calling for a familiar form of emotionally-charged imaginative perspective taking commonly known as empathy. In the ongoing public debates about oppression and privilege, one common refrain is that\u00a0empathy is conspicuously and dangerously missing from the outlook of the powerful and well-off.\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Another thing that seems to be in troublingly short supply is trust in the testimony of people who are in some respects oppressed, subjugated, discriminated against, or otherwise systematically disadvantaged. By testimony, I don\u2019t just mean the kind of declaration one gives in a court: you testify whenever you invite other people to take your word for it that something or other is true. When people who are oppressed in some way testify that an attitude or behavior is offensive or threatening, it is often very important for their addressees to trust what they are saying, to believe them on the basis of their word.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Is it just a coincidence that a lack of empathy seems to coincide with a lack of trust in testimony? What exactly is<\/em> the relationship between empathy and trust in testimony? The full answer to that latter question is complicated. Today, I\u2019ll argue that empathy functions as a particularly powerful tool for supporting trust in testimony. This is only half of the story. There is reason to think that in some situations, reliance on empathy will inhibit the extension of testimonial trust, but that is a topic for another day.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n To trust someone\u2019s testimony, one has to believe both that the testifier is honest and that she is competent\u2013 that she is able to distinguish the offensive from the funny, the threatening from the innocuous. If we have every reason to believe that a person is speaking honestly when she testifies about some circumstance, but we doubt that she is sufficiently skilled at recognizing and responding to evidence, then we cannot take her word for it when she testifies about how things are. Empathy supports trust in testimony because it can provide a basis for the attribution of competence needed for trust in testimony. How so? To answer that question, we need to say a bit more about what empathy is.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n When one empathizes, one considers the other\u2019s situation as though one were occupying the other\u2019s position. When efforts to empathize succeed, one secures an acquaintance with another\u2019s view of the world from the inside, as it were. One feels the imaginative analog of the other\u2019s emotional experience of her situation. So, to take an example, suppose an acquaintance tells me that her colleagues\u2019 admiration of her \u201cbeautiful accent\u201d is irritating, and I regard her testimony as honest. I then do the work of empathizing. I try to see if I can get into her way of seeing things, of emotionally registering the facts about her situation in the same way that she does. If I succeed, then the admiration will also look irritating to me<\/em>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Now, there is of course a difference between having something look <\/em>irritating to you and actually judging <\/em>all things considered that the thing is irritating. But here, two observations are important. First, I can\u2019t simultaneously experience something as irritating (or exciting, or awful) and think that my reaction is totally unintelligible, that there is nothing <\/em>to be said for it. And second, we tend to place a great deal of stock in the way things look to us. Most of the time, we are willing to go along with our emotional presentations of the world\u2019s qualities, to treat them as perfectly correct.<\/p>\n So, when I imaginatively experience the admiration as irritating (via empathy), it will be very difficult if not impossible for me to wholeheartedly believe that my irritation is entirely uncalled for, and I will naturally be inclined to think that I am totally right about the nature of the colleagues\u2019 compliments.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Because I know that my acquaintance\u2019s actual emotional experience of her situation matches my empathetic experience of her situation, when I empathize with my acquaintance I will be practically bound to conclude that there is something right in my acquaintance\u2019s judgment, and I may also be inclined to conclude that her judgment is wholly correct. These conclusions about her judgment, taken separately or together, provide a reason to believe that my acquaintance is appropriately sensitive to irritating phenomena. And, since appropriate sensitivity to the way things are is part of being competent, I thereby secure a reason to attribute epistemic competence to my acquaintance. As we\u2019ve seen, the attribution of competence constitutes one of testimonial trust\u2019s enabling conditions. So, my empathetic effort will furnish a basis for trust in my acquaintance\u2019s testimony.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Empathy has the power to dramatically reshape one\u2019s willingness to trust in others\u2019 testimony. Suppose my acquaintance\u2019s testimony about the irritating nature of colleagues\u2019 remarks takes me by surprise. It doesn\u2019t fit with my general understanding of what kind of things are irritating, and what kinds of things are nice. The colleagues are highlighting one of my acquaintance\u2019s positive traits, and their compliments seem to come from a place of goodwill. Being genuinely admired for a positive trait is usually a good thing. In this case, it would be natural for me to initially suspect that my acquaintance is just touchy, and the thought of her as touchy will incline me to discount all of her testimony about what is troublesome or offensive. But if I take the time to imaginatively place myself in her position, and find that I feel the stirrings of annoyance in myself, matters will look very different. Her irritation will no longer look unaccountable. The possibility of dismissing her testimony as the erroneous upshot of an excessively querulous outlook will recede from view. And next time she mentions that some apparently benign treatment actually isn\u2019t, I will be more inclined to take her word seriously.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Image: Trust by Aditi Basu from Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)<\/p>\n<\/h2>\n
<\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In the aftermath of the Dallas shootings on July 7, 2016, Hillary Clinton said: \u201cWe need to try as best we can to walk in one another\u2019s\u00a0shoes, to imagine what […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":272,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[94,92,93,91],"custom_author":[90],"class_list":["post-269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-emotions","tag-empathy","tag-testimony","tag-trust","custom_author-bailey-olivia"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-4l","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-empathy-inhibits-trust\/","url_meta":{"origin":269,"position":0},"title":"How Empathy Inhibits Trust","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"November 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"In my previous blog post, \u201cHow empathy promotes trust,\u201d I argued that empathy can furnish an important source of trust in other people\u2019s testimony (testifying simply being the act of inviting people to take your word for it that something or other is true). I also mentioned that this positive\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/11\/whenpatternsbreak.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":542,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-empathy-defense-emmett-till-open-casket-and-white-empathy\/","url_meta":{"origin":269,"position":1},"title":"The Empathy Defense: Emmett Till, “Open Casket,” and ‘White Empathy’","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA painting of a dead black boy by a white artist.\u201d This is British artist Hannah Black's description of Dana Schutz's Open Casket, a painting included in the 2017 Whitney Biennial and one that Black has urged be destroyed. The 'dead black boy' is Emmett Till, a fourteen-year-old who was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1756,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/i-hate-cyclists\/","url_meta":{"origin":269,"position":2},"title":"\u201cI hate cyclists!\u201d","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"True story: a friend who works for the NHS had to attend mandatory RESPECT training. The workshop convenor started the day with ice breakers, everyone was invited to say what they liked and disliked. He received answers like teapots, cheese and so on before confessing, \u201cI hate cyclists!\u201d He elaborated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/cyclists.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":945,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/youshouldbelieveher\/","url_meta":{"origin":269,"position":3},"title":"#YouShouldBelieveHer","author":"Andrew O'Sullivan","date":"June 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"We believe what other people tell us. I trust that you are on the way to the mall if you tell me you are on the way to the mall; I believe that the price of oil has gone down because I heard it on the news. In the summer\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/06\/Ibelieveher.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/06\/Ibelieveher.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/06\/Ibelieveher.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/06\/Ibelieveher.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/06\/Ibelieveher.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1738,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/what-type-of-deference-to-science-do-we-owe-each-other\/","url_meta":{"origin":269,"position":4},"title":"What type of deference to science do we owe each other?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"How should the public respond to science communication, and how can science be communicated in a way that promotes such a response? A combination of philosophical and empirical research may provide some answers. A scientifically informed public is an important dimension of deliberative democracy. More specifically, grand societal challenges, such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/Lappland-8-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/Lappland-8-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/Lappland-8-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/Lappland-8-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/Lappland-8-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/Lappland-8-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2161,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/philosophical-foundations-for-chatbot-regulation\/","url_meta":{"origin":269,"position":5},"title":"Philosophical Foundations for Chatbot Regulation","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In an age where we increasingly converse with artifacts - whose interfaces include AI, a pressing question emerges: Who, or what, are we really talking with? As AI-based chatbots, often termed \u2018conversational Ais\u2019, become more sophisticated, the line between human and machine communication blurs, raising profound questions about the nature\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/A-realistic-black-and-white-photograph-of-a-personstanding-in-front-of-a-full-length-mirror-speaking-with-a-robot-reflection.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/A-realistic-black-and-white-photograph-of-a-personstanding-in-front-of-a-full-length-mirror-speaking-with-a-robot-reflection.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/A-realistic-black-and-white-photograph-of-a-personstanding-in-front-of-a-full-length-mirror-speaking-with-a-robot-reflection.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/A-realistic-black-and-white-photograph-of-a-personstanding-in-front-of-a-full-length-mirror-speaking-with-a-robot-reflection.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/10\/trust2.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=269"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":280,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269\/revisions\/280"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=269"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}