{"id":2040,"date":"2024-06-10T10:00:14","date_gmt":"2024-06-10T09:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=2040"},"modified":"2024-06-09T06:42:38","modified_gmt":"2024-06-09T05:42:38","slug":"truth-fiction-and-llms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/truth-fiction-and-llms\/","title":{"rendered":"Truth, fiction and LLMs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The trope of the working novelist isolated for months at a time, hunched over a desk with yellow stained and repetitively strained fingers clacking away on a keyboard is no more. Today\u2019s author needs only a few spare hours, a title, a vague plot, an internet connection and a subscription to an LLM fine-tuned for fiction generation. Readied with that you could churn out a coherent <em>Ulysses<\/em>-length volume in the time it takes to drink a <em>nero<\/em> and walk around Trieste on a James Joyce walking tour. So goes the hype anyway.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Many of us are familiar by now with LLMs as linguistic entities in our world. Perhaps through infuriating encounters with corporate customer service bots or by asking silly questions of <a href=\"https:\/\/chat.openai.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ChatGPT<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/gemini.google.com\/app\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Gemini<\/a>, or <a href=\"https:\/\/claude.ai\/l\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Claude<\/a>. And now if you\u2019re eager to compose your debut novel, then perhaps <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sudowrite.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sudowrite<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/novelai.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NovelAI<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortlyai.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ShortlyAI<\/a> are the LLMs for you.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever one might think of the literary quality of the output of these applications, there is no doubt the speed and ease with which prose can be generated is staggering. For those of us who have idly imagined writing a novel, it is tempting to delve further into a technology that allows a user to enter a few plot details, the names, traits, tone of voice and arcs of the protagonists and then pressing a button to bypass the painstaking process of actually writing some chapters. If you know where to start your chapter, but not where to go, then it\u2019s possible to write a short sentence and click on a button to expand it. If you like the idea in a section but not the writing, then click a button and a rewrite will be generated in seconds. There are even buttons to click to provide descriptions of sounds, smells, sights etc\u2026 if the descriptive aspect to writing is not awakening the muse. Taken to its most extreme, a user can even merely place a cursor at the end of some text, click \u201cwrite\u201d, and the programme will generate another block of text. If you wish, this could be done <em>ad infinitum<\/em> and so the overseeing human novelist is barely required.<\/p>\n<p>This isn\u2019t entirely new, those old enough to remember back to 2018 might recall a minor news story of the novel <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jbe-books.com\/products\/1-the-road-by-an-artificial-neural\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>1 the Road<\/em><\/a> created by Ross Goodwin using a car, a camera, a GPS and a microphone plugged into his laptop. Using inputs from the sensors fed through a neural network and re-tracing the route of Jack Kerouac\u2019s famous road trip that became the basis for his 1957 <em>On the Road<\/em>, Goodwin\u2019s laptop printed out a novel on receipt paper.<\/p>\n<p>With AI writing technology now widely available there are questions from the point of view of authors as to what their role is in the current world. We\u2019ve seen hints of what might be to come in other arts. In March 2023 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/how-my-ai-image-won-a-major-photography-competition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Boris Eldagsen<\/a> won the Sony World Photography Award with an image generated using DALL-E 2 titled \u2018The Electrician.\u2019 Around the same time a largely-AI generated viral hit emerged titled \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2023\/04\/19\/arts\/music\/ai-drake-the-weeknd-fake.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Heart on my Sleeve<\/a>.\u201d This was created by TikTok user Ghostwriter977 with an AI called \u2018so vits svc\u2019 replicating the vocals of Canadian artists Drake and The Weeknd. AI generated art is already around us and any Turing Test-type questions about artificial art look wholly redundant.<\/p>\n<p>And while questions about what happens to artists and authors in an age of AI are important, there is another angle to this we should pay attention to. In particular, we need to think about what this all means for our engagement with art and literature. Indeed it seems that this point in the development of generative technology is precisely the right time for us to reflect on the art we enjoy and what it is we\u2019re doing when we engage with it.<\/p>\n<p>Philosophers have long been interested in the relationship of truth to fiction. Sometimes this is through consideration of what it is for something to be true in a fiction, but there\u2019s also a distinct yet related set of questions as to what it is to find truth <em>through<\/em> fiction. Now a lot can be said about this distinction, but when thinking about LLM generated fiction, we can also think the notion of truth and fiction quite generally.<\/p>\n<p>The very idea that literature can provide us with access to truths goes back at least as far as Aristotle\u2019s <em>Poetics<\/em>. Aristotle\u2019s thought was that poetry, and so by extension literature, can be a way of thinking about general, universal truths about humanity, the world and about reasoning itself. The upshot being that an author &#8211; through their observations, reflections and writing &#8211; can help us, as readers, to understand or relate to some truth.<\/p>\n<p>If this view of literature is something we take seriously, then it\u2019s perhaps worth paying attention to whether we are indeed still engaging with these universal truths when confronted with AI generated works. Knowing what we do about how an LLM generates its outputs, it is certainly the case that an AI novel written entirely using an LLM is not written by a reflective observer. Not as most of us would recognise it at least. Rather in its function as a product of an LLM, it is generated unreflectively based on a technologically mind-blowing and spectacularly complex <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2212.03551\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">probabilistic set of calculations<\/a> about what the next word in a sequence should be.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the LLMs in the examples I discussed here all give humans some direct involvement in creating either images, or songs, or novels. It is human prompts that initiate the LLM to produce its outputs. \u00a0And maybe we can consider this human input to provide us with some grounding into the creative intentions of an author. Perhaps, then, this direct human oversight provides us with the opportunity to find truth in or through fiction. However, it\u2019s clear that as we continue to use applications such as Sudowrite, we\u2019re also training future iterations that will be less dependent on human curation. And as we do this, there seems little reason to expect that the human-AI balance in the creative process won\u2019t become even more tilted towards AI. We might expect that the direct human creator\u2019s voice will become more akin to an editor.<\/p>\n<p>This all matters because literature matters. Stories matter. Tied up in our history are the stories we tell. They can help to shape our ethics, our societies and our beliefs. And as we develop and embrace AI in generating art, it\u2019s important that we don\u2019t lose sight of the importance of the relationship between truth and fiction.<\/p>\n<p>Picture\u00a0by <a href=\"https:\/\/unsplash.com\/@itfeelslikefilm?utm_content=creditCopyText&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=unsplash\">\ud83c\uddf8\ud83c\uddee Janko Ferli\u010d<\/a> on <a href=\"https:\/\/unsplash.com\/photos\/photo-of-library-with-turned-on-lights-sfL_QOnmy00?utm_content=creditCopyText&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=unsplash\">Unsplash<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The trope of the working novelist isolated for months at a time, hunched over a desk with yellow stained and repetitively strained fingers clacking away on a keyboard is no [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":2044,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Patrick Connolly \"Truth, fiction and LLMs\" on Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[379,450],"custom_author":[451],"class_list":["post-2040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-ai","tag-fiction","custom_author-connolly-patrick"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-wU","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2274,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/intellectual-virtues-online-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":2040,"position":0},"title":"Intellectual Virtues Online \u2013 Part 2","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In my last entry, I praised the advantages of intellectual virtues in an online environment. This time, I briefly consider why too much of a focus on intellectual virtues might not be the best solution for the problematic aspects of the Internet after all. I discuss two issues, though they\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Open for Debate&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/service-pnp-det-4a20000-4a25000-4a25600-4a25686v.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/service-pnp-det-4a20000-4a25000-4a25600-4a25686v.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/service-pnp-det-4a20000-4a25000-4a25600-4a25686v.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/service-pnp-det-4a20000-4a25000-4a25600-4a25686v.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-vices-of-truthlessness\/","url_meta":{"origin":2040,"position":1},"title":"The Vices of Truthlessness","author":"Charlie Crerar","date":"August 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"From \u2018post-truth\u2019, to \u2018fake news\u2019, to \u2018alternative facts\u2019, truthlessness is everywhere at the moment. These phenomena present us with a huge array of questions. How do we separate fact from fiction? How can we tell which sources of information are credible? Is there even such a thing as objective truth?\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;In the News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"In the News","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/in-the-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/08\/truth-2069846_960_720.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/08\/truth-2069846_960_720.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/08\/truth-2069846_960_720.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/08\/truth-2069846_960_720.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2161,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/philosophical-foundations-for-chatbot-regulation\/","url_meta":{"origin":2040,"position":2},"title":"Philosophical Foundations for Chatbot Regulation","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In an age where we increasingly converse with artifacts - whose interfaces include AI, a pressing question emerges: Who, or what, are we really talking with? As AI-based chatbots, often termed \u2018conversational Ais\u2019, become more sophisticated, the line between human and machine communication blurs, raising profound questions about the nature\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Open for Debate&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/A-realistic-black-and-white-photograph-of-a-personstanding-in-front-of-a-full-length-mirror-speaking-with-a-robot-reflection.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/A-realistic-black-and-white-photograph-of-a-personstanding-in-front-of-a-full-length-mirror-speaking-with-a-robot-reflection.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/A-realistic-black-and-white-photograph-of-a-personstanding-in-front-of-a-full-length-mirror-speaking-with-a-robot-reflection.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/A-realistic-black-and-white-photograph-of-a-personstanding-in-front-of-a-full-length-mirror-speaking-with-a-robot-reflection.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":856,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/which-crisis-of-trust\/","url_meta":{"origin":2040,"position":3},"title":"Which crisis of trust?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The UK Labour Party\u2019s leadership contest is well underway after heavy defeat in the 2019 General Election. There is nothing close to consensus within the Party about why things went wrong, and still very little agreement on the most high-profile political issues. Members could be forgiven, then, for taking solace\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Open for Debate&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/02\/elvis-bekmanis-HORKkCWWBsM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1685,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/mind-my-extended-mind-guarding-cognitions-non-organic-parts\/","url_meta":{"origin":2040,"position":4},"title":"Mind my extended mind:  Guarding cognition\u2019s non-organic parts","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Our smartphones and laptops are undeniably important. But in what sense? Are they simply valuable technological peripherals\u2014not to be easily discarded or left behind\u2014but complimentary devices, nonetheless? Or could they be far more than that; perhaps proper parts of who we are? Answering this question is neither easy nor inconsequential.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Open for Debate&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/brain-g1f07fb951_1280.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/brain-g1f07fb951_1280.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/brain-g1f07fb951_1280.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/brain-g1f07fb951_1280.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/brain-g1f07fb951_1280.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1323,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/choosing-a-future-for-humanity-effective-altruism-and-longtermism-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":2040,"position":5},"title":"Choosing a future for humanity: effective altruism and longtermism: Part 2","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"November 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"In discussions among the charity evaluators whom I described in the previous post, Derek Parfit is often quoted as saying that we live at \u2018the hinge of history\u2019. What he meant is that we live at a time when we have at our disposal the means to do greater good\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Open for Debate&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/11\/mountain_goats_jumping_leaping_wildlife_nature_rocks_peak_wilderness-830974-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/11\/mountain_goats_jumping_leaping_wildlife_nature_rocks_peak_wilderness-830974-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/11\/mountain_goats_jumping_leaping_wildlife_nature_rocks_peak_wilderness-830974-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/11\/mountain_goats_jumping_leaping_wildlife_nature_rocks_peak_wilderness-830974-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/11\/mountain_goats_jumping_leaping_wildlife_nature_rocks_peak_wilderness-830974-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/06\/janko-ferlic-sfL_QOnmy00-unsplash-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2040"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2040\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2045,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2040\/revisions\/2045"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2044"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2040"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=2040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}