{"id":2006,"date":"2024-05-13T10:00:41","date_gmt":"2024-05-13T09:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=2006"},"modified":"2024-04-27T11:18:29","modified_gmt":"2024-04-27T10:18:29","slug":"on-hope-and-despair-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/on-hope-and-despair-part-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"On Hope and Despair (Part II)"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the previous post<\/a>, I raised the possibility that people can hope<\/em> without hope<\/em>, that is, hope for things that they simultaneously despair or feel unhopeful about. Far from being a contradiction, I defended this possibility on the basis that hope has two different senses \u2013 hoping<\/em> and being hopeful<\/em>. Since each of these senses refers to a distinct mental phenomenon, a person can therefore hope for a desired outcome but at the same time be unhopeful about it.<\/p>\n

Hoping without hope is an important way of hoping for things. It allows people in awful and difficult situations to hope or to maintain their hope for things integral to their survival, identities or notions of a good life. Many who live under oppressive conditions, for instance, hope \u2013 and the need to hope \u2013 that they will live a life free from poverty and violence. But this kind of hoping, it must be emphasized, is anything but rosy or upbeat. Rather, it is a sober and realistic kind of hoping, and can be quite demoralizing and torturous. People who hope without hope are well aware of the pitfalls and obstacles that stand between them and the outcome that they so eagerly desire. Although they acknowledge that these pitfalls and obstacles can in theory be overcome, they simply cannot see any way in which that can happen. That is why they despair while hoping.<\/p>\n

Hoping without hope therefore also represents a loss or absence of hope. Crucially, what is lost and absent is hopefulness. People who despair do not think or feel positively about the chances that their hoped-for outcomes will be realized. Instead, they are consumed by negative thoughts and feelings surrounding just how unlikely these outcomes will turn out. An important and surprising insight that has been overlooked by hope theorists but which has emerged from the present discussion is that despair presupposes<\/em> hoping: A person cannot despair about a desired outcome unless <\/em>they also hope for it at the same time. The reason is simple: If a person did not desire something that they believe has some chance of obtaining, there would not be anything for them to be hopeful or unhopeful about.<\/p>\n

And that can and often does happen. People can cease believing that an outcome they desire has a chance of being realized. But when this happens, I contend that they will have lost hope in a very different way than those who are not hopeful: They would no longer hope for the outcome. This of course does not mean that they no longer desire the outcome; they may well continue to do so. However, since they don\u2019t believe, not even on paper, that the outcome has any chance of obtaining, they stop hoping for it. Given that they lack the mental attitude of hoping, they are, in this sense, hopeless<\/em>.<\/p>\n

In everyday language, hopelessness and despair are for the most part treated as synonyms and used interchangeably to refer to a loss of hope. Many dictionary entries define them in terms of one another; the Oxford English Dictionary, for instance, lists \u201cfeeling despair\u201d as a meaning of hopelessness. But as I have shown, hope can be lost or absent in two distinct ways. In order to capture them, my preference is to use \u2018despair\u2019 to refer to the absence of hopefulness, and \u2018hopelessness\u2019, to the absence of hoping.<\/p>\n

This distinction matters, for doing so has important practical applications. For example, if we are interested in helping people recover hope, we need to know in which sense they have lost hope, i.e., whether they have stopped hoping for some outcome (hopelessness) or they have stopped being hopeful about its being realized (despair). This is because hopelessness and despair have different antidotes.<\/p>\n

Take hopelessness first. I noted earlier that a reason people do not or no longer hope for an outcome is that they do not believe that such an outcome has any chance of obtaining. Some people, for instance, believe that it is impossible for them to be happy and so, do not hope for it. To help them recover hope, that is, to get them to hope<\/em>, our general strategy would revolve around showing or persuading them that their desired outcome is not in fact an impossibility. The key is to encourage them to see, by way of evidence or argument, that it has some <\/em>chance of being realized. Another reason people may experience hopelessness with respect to some outcome is that they do not desire it. In extreme cases of hopelessness, some people may not hope for anything <\/em>at all. The antidote to this source of hopelessness will require a different strategy. To get them to hope, we would need to convince them that certain outcomes are valuable and worth desiring.<\/p>\n

What about despair? Notice that neither of the above strategies is applicable in helping people in despair recover hope. Indeed, it would be quite odd to try to convince them that some outcome is worth desiring or that it has some chance of obtaining. This is because people who despair already <\/em>desire the outcome in question and believe that it has some chance of happening. In fact, it is precisely because <\/em>they desire it and believe that it is a possibility that <\/em>they despair. Despair therefore calls for a different remedy. To spark hopefulness in the despairing, what we would need to do is to inspire them to see new ways in which their desired outcomes can be realized. If the source of their despair is that they have no way of seeing how they can cross the chasm that separates them from their desired outcome, our goal would be to stir them into drawing up a mental bridge.<\/p>\n

No doubt a lot more remains to be said about the main cast of these posts: hoping, hopefulness, despair and hopelessness. But I hope \u2013 and am hopeful \u2013 that I have shown that taking the two distinctions I have been urging seriously opens up exciting and surprising possibilities for those who want to recover hope and those who want to be better hopers.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In the previous post, I raised the possibility that people can hope without hope, that is, hope for things that they simultaneously despair or feel unhopeful about. Far from being […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":2008,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Jack Kwong, \"On Hope and Despair (Part II)\" on Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[445,444,446],"custom_author":[447],"class_list":["post-2006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-despair","tag-hope","tag-hopefulness","custom_author-kwong-jack-m-c"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-wm","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2003,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/on-hope-and-despair-part-i\/","url_meta":{"origin":2006,"position":0},"title":"On Hope and Despair (Part I)","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"April 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In today\u2019s world, it is not difficult to find something to despair about: Climate change, mass shootings, wars, reproductive rights, racism, social and economic inequality, and politics, just to name a few examples. And many people do in fact despair over these issues. One reason why despair can be such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2228,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/being-pluralistic-about-philosophical-pessimism-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":2006,"position":1},"title":"Being pluralistic about philosophical pessimism (Part 1)","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"March 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There are many vernacular senses of pessimism. Familiar images of half-empty glasses go with elaborate talk of ours as \u2018the worst possible world\u2019. Pessimistic people might be praised as resolute truth-tellers or condemned as downbeat \u2018doom-mongers\u2019. Politicians often condemn pessimism as a call to apathy, a counsel of despair, or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/alexandre-dinaut-pgYPX-Cy3iE-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/alexandre-dinaut-pgYPX-Cy3iE-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/alexandre-dinaut-pgYPX-Cy3iE-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/alexandre-dinaut-pgYPX-Cy3iE-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/alexandre-dinaut-pgYPX-Cy3iE-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/alexandre-dinaut-pgYPX-Cy3iE-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1841,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/we-should-complain\/","url_meta":{"origin":2006,"position":2},"title":"We Should Complain","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"I write about complaint to reduce its stigma. I teach classic philosophical texts that argue against it, so I realize the stigma is longstanding. Complaining is soft, Aristotle says. It\u2019s undignified, Immanuel Kant adds. It should never be enjoyed, they both say. I aim to counter that. I noticed this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/hands-and-head.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/hands-and-head.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/hands-and-head.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/hands-and-head.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":21,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/open-for-debate\/","url_meta":{"origin":2006,"position":3},"title":"We are now open for debate","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Welcome to 'Open for Debate', a blog associated with the project Changing Attitudes in Public Discourse.\u00a0We hope to use this space to debate all aspects and forms of debate. Ultimately, we would like to develop together, in the spirit of collaboration, some suggestions to improve the quality of discussions in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1625,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/truth-and-the-facebookians\/","url_meta":{"origin":2006,"position":4},"title":"Truth and the Facebookians","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Imagine a community\u2014call them the \u201cFacebookians\u201d\u2014whose politics is deeply polarized. Their political discourse reflects this divisiveness, but to a very unusual extent. For in making political claims, Facebookians are guided by just one rule: only say (or post) what is liked by your friends and which you are willing defend\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Neon sign with zero \"likes\"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/prateek-katyal-xv7-GlvBLFw-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/ruminating-on-fake-news-online-education-and-intellectual-humility\/","url_meta":{"origin":2006,"position":5},"title":"Ruminating on Fake News, Online Education, and Intellectual Humility","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"From 2015 until last month (May, 2018), I was involved with a project at the University of Edinburgh, which aimed to produce a massive open online course (or MOOC) on intellectual humility. One of the central goals of the project was to give various academics who are producing extremely valuable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Hope.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2006"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2006\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2012,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2006\/revisions\/2012"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2006"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=2006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}