{"id":1860,"date":"2024-01-08T10:00:33","date_gmt":"2024-01-08T10:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1860"},"modified":"2024-01-05T15:11:13","modified_gmt":"2024-01-05T15:11:13","slug":"the-epistemology-of-rumours","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-epistemology-of-rumours\/","title":{"rendered":"The Epistemology of Rumours"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rumours disrupt official lines of communication and can derail policy. During the 2013 \u2013 2016 West African Ebola outbreak, rumours were that medics were stealing bodies to be sold for parts on the international organ market<\/a>. In response, people kept their sick loved ones at home. In South Africa, in the mid-2000s, HIV\/AIDS treatment finally became publicly available after a protracted battle to access medication, but rumours were that \u201ctesting programmes\u201d were a cover for agents of the old racist apartheid regime to spread disease rather than treat it<\/a>. This led to trepidation and initial resistance. In Uganda, in the early 2000s, many refused to participate in a mass anti-parasitic treatment scheme. At the time, rumours were that the Ugandan and American governments were in cahoots to reduce African birth rates, and that the anti-parasitic would lead to infertility and miscarriages<\/a>. Given that rumours are such a problem for these large-scale interventions, what exactly are they and what is their epistemic status?<\/p>\n

Rumours are unofficial nuggets of information that we pass between each other. There is nothing \u201cofficial\u201d to underwrite their credibility. They are unlikely to come from the experts, and they aren\u2019t the kind of stories we share with people we consider to be above us in the social pecking order \u2013 we share rumours with our friends and neighbours, but not our priests or professors. They are the ultimate form of peer testimony.<\/p>\n

Rumours are different from gossip, because rumours tend to focus more on issues of public concern. A rumour concerns a new disease testing programme. Gossip, on the other hand, tends to focus on the personal \u2013 who exactly is Taylor Swift dating at the moment and how long will it last?<\/p>\n

Rumours are also different from conspiracy theories, even though some rumours might be also be conspiratorial, like the one about Ugandan and American governments cooperating to reduce African birth rates. On Quassim Cassam\u2019s philosophical account of conspiracy theories<\/a>, conspiracy theories are obviously wrong<\/em> and those who hold them are contrarian<\/em>. It is not clear that the people involved in our cases are either of these things. Those deciding whether it is safe to take their loved ones to the Ebola treatment centre aren\u2019t being \u2018contrarian\u2019, they are afraid. And it isn\u2019t clear that the beliefs that they hold are obviously <\/em>wrong. In the South Africa, where people were frightened that medics might be spreading AIDS as part of a racist plot, there had been an actual biological weapons programme (Project Coast)<\/a> under the apartheid government and debates about whether HIV could act as a raced bioweapon.<\/p>\n

Even though rumours aren\u2019t the same as gossip or conspiracy theories, they get a bad rap in epistemology. They seem an obviously bad way of getting information about the world. Some early psychological studies back this up. Allport and Postman\u2019s 1948 classic, The Psychology of Rumor<\/em>, studied Second World War rumours and under experimental conditions found that they operate a lot like a children\u2019s game of \u2018broken telephones\u2019 \u2013 the information gets garbled as it gets transmitted along the rumour chain. But it isn\u2019t clear that this is how rumours operate in the wild. In reality, we tend to know more about the people we are talking to and we may interact with them more than just the once off of an experiment. This can act as a pressure to pass on good information, because we don\u2019t want to ruin our reputations. But this only works if we know who we are talking to.<\/p>\n

Online rumour mongering is a whole different ballgame. Not only does the anonymity of the internet mean that we lose out on the reputational risks that nudge us toward sharing good information, but the novelty of falsity leads to more and quicker transmission of untrue stories. One study<\/a> showed that false stories could reach up to 100,000 people compared to true stories maxing out at around 1,000. It also took the true stories substantially longer to get shares than the false ones.<\/p>\n

While the online nature of much rumour sharing has its problems, rumours on the internet are more amenable to tracking than their orally-transmitted counterparts (who, after all, has access to the chatter of the local knitting group?). This is useful. Given the grassroots level at which rumours operate, they are often the first indicator that something is going on. This can be extremely important for things like epidemic preparedness. One way to know that a disease outbreak has occurred is to wait for patients to start showing up at clinics, but this involves delays and there are plenty of reasons why people might not make it to medical facilities, assuming that there is a clinic to make it to. In the West African Ebola outbreak, there were rumours of strange deaths long before people started arriving for care. Knowing how useful it is to pay attention to rumours, the World Health Organisation (WHO) set up a rumour monitoring network in 1997, precisely to make sure that they can be alerted to potential issues before official data is available. Note that it doesn\u2019t matter whether disease rumours are getting the story exactly right; it is simply helpful to know that there is something to pay attention to.<\/p>\n

Getting too hung up on whether rumours are passing on literally true information might also miss the point. How much of our communication is about exchanging bits of literal truth? When we actually talk to each other, we often bend the truth to make for a more entertaining or amusing story, or to make the moral of the story stick. And we are often aware that what we are being told is not completely true. It might be less important that the witch does not really live in a gingerbread house in the forest, than it is to remember not to stray into the woods alone.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Photo: Uganda by Richard Stupart<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Rumours disrupt official lines of communication and can derail policy. During the 2013 \u2013 2016 West African Ebola outbreak, rumours were that medics were stealing bodies to be sold for […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1863,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Katherine Furman \"The Epistemology of Rumours\" on Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[36,428,427],"custom_author":[429],"class_list":["post-1860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-epistemology","tag-misinformation","tag-rumours","custom_author-furman-katherine"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-u0","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1416,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/sharing-bullshit-on-social-media\/","url_meta":{"origin":1860,"position":0},"title":"Sharing bullshit on social media","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s another dull day of commuting to work, and you are waiting for the bus. Bored, you open your phone and start scrolling the all-too-familiar, endless cascade of mildly uninteresting content posted by your friends on social media. And there it is, next to pictures of happy babies and pixelated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/Birds_Arent_Real__billboard_in_Memphis.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/Birds_Arent_Real__billboard_in_Memphis.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/Birds_Arent_Real__billboard_in_Memphis.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/Birds_Arent_Real__billboard_in_Memphis.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/Birds_Arent_Real__billboard_in_Memphis.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/Birds_Arent_Real__billboard_in_Memphis.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":21,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/open-for-debate\/","url_meta":{"origin":1860,"position":1},"title":"We are now open for debate","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Welcome to 'Open for Debate', a blog associated with the project Changing Attitudes in Public Discourse.\u00a0We hope to use this space to debate all aspects and forms of debate. Ultimately, we would like to develop together, in the spirit of collaboration, some suggestions to improve the quality of discussions in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/04\/19945231246_a0ea274061_k.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1733,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/a-study-of-the-virtue-of-epistemic-collaborativeness\/","url_meta":{"origin":1860,"position":2},"title":"A Study of the Virtue of Epistemic Collaborativeness","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Agents can achieve far greater things when working in groups than individually. For instance, some of the most important scientific theories and findings have been the product of epistemic collaboration (see e.g. Einstein and Grossman's collaborative work in developing the relativistic theory of gravitation). But what is the personality trait\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/african-g242c4c526_640.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/african-g242c4c526_640.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/african-g242c4c526_640.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2030,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/non-ideal-epistemology-as-a-guidance-for-inquiry\/","url_meta":{"origin":1860,"position":3},"title":"Non-ideal epistemology as a guidance for inquiry","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In our daily lives, we conduct numerous inquiries. Some of them are aimed at questions that have no significant impact on our lives, such as which restaurant in town has the best sushi, what does our friend want for her birthday, or in which year the last album of our\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Tomat_photo_blogpost-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Tomat_photo_blogpost-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Tomat_photo_blogpost-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Tomat_photo_blogpost-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Tomat_photo_blogpost-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/05\/Tomat_photo_blogpost-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1880,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/zetetic-standpoint-epistemology\/","url_meta":{"origin":1860,"position":4},"title":"Zetetic standpoint epistemology","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A central claim of standpoint theory is that the oppressed have an epistemic advantage over the dominant with respect to the workings of oppression. This \u2018epistemic advantage thesis\u2019 ranges over issues like whether some event or action is an instance of oppression, what it is like to be oppressed, what\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/02\/questionpexels-pixabay-356079-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/02\/questionpexels-pixabay-356079-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/02\/questionpexels-pixabay-356079-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/02\/questionpexels-pixabay-356079-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/02\/questionpexels-pixabay-356079-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/02\/questionpexels-pixabay-356079-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2267,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/intellectual-virtues-online-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":1860,"position":5},"title":"Intellectual Virtues Online \u2013 Part 1","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"For the second year in a row, the World Economic Forum has ranked misinformation and disinformation among the top global risks. And few places provide more opportunities for spreading misinformation and disinformation than the Internet. From conspiracy theories about stolen elections, to biased search results[1], deepfakes of politicians and LLM\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/pexels-marcelo-moreira-988124-2225771-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/pexels-marcelo-moreira-988124-2225771-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/pexels-marcelo-moreira-988124-2225771-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/pexels-marcelo-moreira-988124-2225771-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/pexels-marcelo-moreira-988124-2225771-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/pexels-marcelo-moreira-988124-2225771-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/01\/Uganda.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1860"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1860\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1866,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1860\/revisions\/1866"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1860"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}