{"id":1841,"date":"2023-12-11T10:00:25","date_gmt":"2023-12-11T10:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1841"},"modified":"2023-12-08T16:20:57","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T16:20:57","slug":"we-should-complain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/we-should-complain\/","title":{"rendered":"We Should Complain"},"content":{"rendered":"

I write<\/a> about complaint to reduce its stigma. I teach classic philosophical texts that argue against it, so I realize the stigma is longstanding. Complaining is soft, Aristotle says. It\u2019s undignified, Immanuel Kant adds. It should never be enjoyed, they both say. I aim to counter that.<\/p>\n

I noticed this pattern in the classics while adjusting to moving from the Washington, DC, area to a small city in Ontario. I liked my new home and its good people, but the culture was not quite the same in one way: The negative icebreaker that was a habit on the east coast (\u201cwere you delayed by that horrible traffic too?\u201d) was now likely to get the response, \u201cWell, you can\u2019t complain!\u201d And they meant it.<\/p>\n

I was probably complaining more than I think.<\/p>\n

Most people who hear that I write about complaining immediately tell me of someone they know who complains too much. It\u2019s never themselves, and that might be because it is harder to notice our own excesses. We notice our costs, and complainers cost us. Chronic complaint can result in \u201cmood contagion\u201d for listeners, according to psychologist Robin Kowalski, and that mood contagion can lead to resentment and conflict.<\/p>\n

No wonder complaining is assumed to be bad, especially when it seems indulgent, especially when we\u2019re not the ones in pain. Philosophers tend not to identify with those in pain. (As Mariana Alessandri says in Night Vision<\/em>, \u201ccomplaining about pain is risky.\u201d)<\/p>\n

Protest is different. Scholars are quick to identify with dignified people, and protest asserts dignity, self-respect, respect for others. Protest is productive of change or at least aspires to better worlds. Philosopher Julian Baggini praises protest as one form of \u201cconstructive complaining,\u201d and says expressions that fall short of contributing to a better world are \u201cfutile,\u201d because \u201cthere is no point in protesting that things are not as they ought to be if they can\u2019t be any different.\u201d<\/p>\n

His view is like that of many Stoics who encourage focus on what we can control. Whining about what\u2019s not up to us won\u2019t solve anything. I complain about the weather. I have no aspirations to change it. I just want someone to agree that winter in Ontario is too long! Stoics are right. That complaint isn\u2019t productive.<\/p>\n

But there is more to life than productivity. Believing that complaint must be either a protest (and therefore good) or it\u2019s pointless (bad) misses out on complaining\u2019s other functions. A complaint can also be a criticism, a greeting, an accusation of blame, an excuse, a release of pent-up feeling, an invitation to another to share in kind, or a plea for sympathy. Sometimes it really is just a report. \u201cPatient complains of \u2026\u201d \u201cI got coffee on my shirt.\u201d We also want to articulate experiences, put words to feelings, sort something out. These are not all equally bad things.<\/p>\n

To reduce the stigma of complaint, I encourage identifying with complainers instead of with productivity machines. We are vulnerable to pain and attuned to social situations. At times, we may even owe it to ourselves to complain so that we’re not neglecting our need for help. We need help when we feel terribly isolated. During the pandemic, that isolation was widely experienced. People also reported feeling burned out, especially in care-providing jobs. Burnout is not always responsive to troubleshooting solutions or trying to be more productive. Sometimes complaining is the only thing left to do. Without some affirmation, we can be awfully lost, and at such times it is important to learn that we are not alone.<\/p>\n

We can also complain to avoid lying to ourselves or others. To know ourselves, and to be able to tell a coherent narrative about who we are, we have to be honest about our pains. Letting people know that we are not perfect, that we suffer from troubles that others may be suffering from as well, can indicate a healthy self-awareness and demonstrate humility and truth in self-representation. It may take personal courage to admit that we are in pain or vulnerable, but it is important to our own well-being.<\/p>\n

Complaining can be done for the sake of others, too. Offering a complaint to another is like opening a door, inviting someone to enter this safe space of disclosure. Complaint seeks acknowledgement (\u201cSurely I am not alone?\u201d) and<\/em> acknowledges others (\u201cYou are not alone\u201d). Even minor complaints can affirm the perceptions of others.<\/p>\n

And it\u2019s not always minor. Complaining can be the respite of those with great pain, burdensome secrets, and few avenues for companionable support. In very bad times when it seems like all hope is lost\u2014and it really might be lost, I\u2019m no optimist\u2014then complaining may even be the alternative<\/em> to despair, or rather, an activity that relieves its weight because the despair is shared. When we want to complain that the unfixable world is hard to bear, making the world better is not the aim.<\/p>\n

Of course, complaining might result in personal or social change. Finding that others share or appreciate the seriousness of one\u2019s complaints, even about hopeless situations, can create forms of solidarity that lead to what philosopher Katie Stockdale calls collective hope. Knowing that others see how irreversibly bad some situations are can repair our attitudes toward each other even if it cannot repair the world. And sometimes, happily, we turn out to be wrong. Pointless complaining can lead to unexpected realizations of solutions or strategies for coping that we did not anticipate when we turned to our supporters. That we can be wrong<\/em> about what\u2019s hopeless<\/em> should be a compelling reason to waste some time.<\/p>\n

I mentioned philosophers who shake their heads at those who enjoy complaining, but complaint is a thoroughly human pleasure that I think my favorite philosopher might have appreciated. John Stuart Mill wrote that we are capable of higher and lower pleasures, and he didn\u2019t just mean mental versus physical. Lower pleasures are simple, direct, unmediated. A lower pleasure can be a grain of sugar on the tongue or a laugh at a joke, an uninterrupted response to perception. A higher pleasure is indirect. Climbing a mountain or reading a mystery is a higher pleasure, painful or confusing in the short term but gratifying over time when we enjoy its complex achievement.<\/p>\n

Mill\u2019s point about higher pleasures is that people seek them out. Most of us are complicated beings who don\u2019t merely want grains of sugar on our tongues (although I want those too). It is a common human experience that we cannot help but pursue complex as well as simple pleasures, higher and lower pleasures, and are happiest with a variety of them over time.<\/p>\n

Complaining engages our robust capacities for pleasure. We are capable of complex and high-minded pleasures like protest or constructive complaint. But we\u2019re also great at lower and higher pleasures including laughter, mourning, bonding, fighting, trashing, gossiping, and deploring, sometimes all at once. Some complaints are simple yelps of pain. Others are complex forms of social bonding, they pay out over time, and they feel good when done well. I suggest that we should do all of that, together, more often than never.<\/p>\n

Picture: Hands and Head by Timothy Actwell<\/a> on Flickr<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"I write about complaint to reduce its stigma. I teach classic philosophical texts that argue against it, so I realize the stigma is longstanding. Complaining is soft, Aristotle says. It\u2019s […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1848,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Kathryn Norlock \"We Should Complain\" on Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[424,160],"custom_author":[425],"class_list":["post-1841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-complaint","tag-ethics","custom_author-norlock-kathryn-j"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-tH","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1834,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/suicidal-ideation-or-malingering-a-case-of-testimonial-injustice\/","url_meta":{"origin":1841,"position":0},"title":"Suicidal Ideation or \u2018Malingering\u2019? A case of Testimonial Injustice.","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"November 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduction According to the Office for National Statistics, 5,275 suicides were registered in England and Wales in 2022[1]. Nevertheless, reports of the intent to kill oneself are not always met with the credibility they deserve, with potentially fatal results. We recognise this as testimonial injustice, whereby a person\u2019s testimony is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/11\/silence_472195090_badcc23262_c.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/11\/silence_472195090_badcc23262_c.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/11\/silence_472195090_badcc23262_c.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/11\/silence_472195090_badcc23262_c.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1617,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/testimonial-injustice-in-healthcare-an-alternative-diagnosis\/","url_meta":{"origin":1841,"position":1},"title":"Testimonial injustice in healthcare \u2013 an alternative diagnosis","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"January 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The common patient complaint of not feeling listened to is familiar to many and well tracked throughout various channels. Whether it be the UK governments 2020 report on endometriosis care that describe women who speak of the difficulty of getting healthcare professionals to take their pain seriously and not \u201cthink[ing]\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/jon-tyson-vVSleEYPSGY-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/jon-tyson-vVSleEYPSGY-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/jon-tyson-vVSleEYPSGY-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/jon-tyson-vVSleEYPSGY-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/jon-tyson-vVSleEYPSGY-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/jon-tyson-vVSleEYPSGY-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2213,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/samuel-alito-and-the-ethics-of-suspicion\/","url_meta":{"origin":1841,"position":2},"title":"Samuel Alito and the Ethics of Suspicion","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"March 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Samuel Alito, of the United States Supreme Court, professes to be an \u201coriginalist\u201d about the interpretation of the law. The originalist approach, roughly speaking, says that judges should adhere to the intent behind and\/or meaning of the words of the U.S. Constitution as originally written, without trying to interpret\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/judge-stock-image-scaled.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/judge-stock-image-scaled.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/judge-stock-image-scaled.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/judge-stock-image-scaled.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/judge-stock-image-scaled.jpeg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/03\/judge-stock-image-scaled.jpeg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1016,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/with-a-little-help-from-our-civic-friends\/","url_meta":{"origin":1841,"position":3},"title":"With a little help from our civic friends?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Neboj\u0161a Zeli\u010d\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Ana Gavran Milo\u0161 To speak of friendship in a political context is not particularly appealing for several reasons. First of all, friendship is the kind of relationship we have in our private and intimate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/09\/Neboj%C5%A1a-Zeli%C4%8D-300x200.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1064,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/is-jk-rowling-transphobic\/","url_meta":{"origin":1841,"position":4},"title":"Is JK Rowling transphobic?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"November 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Is JK Rowling transphobic? According to many transgender activists and their supporters, including Harry Potter stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, and Eddie Redmayne she is. The LGBTQ+ organisation GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) has said that the author \u201ccontinues to align herself with an ideology which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/11\/BWTrans_Women_are_Real_Women_39819062561-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":709,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/putting-academic-skepticism-to-work\/","url_meta":{"origin":1841,"position":5},"title":"Putting Academic Skepticism to Work","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Academic Skeptics were philosophers who modeled themselves on Socrates and his method of questioning.\u00a0 When the Delphic Oracle reported that no one was wiser than him, Socrates reasoned that whatever wisdom he had was to be found in his recognizing that he does not know many important things.\u00a0 And\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/07\/Philosopher-16-6-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/07\/Philosopher-16-6-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/07\/Philosopher-16-6-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/07\/Philosopher-16-6-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/07\/Philosopher-16-6-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/07\/Philosopher-16-6-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/hands-and-head.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1841"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1841\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1846,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1841\/revisions\/1846"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1848"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1841"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}