{"id":1817,"date":"2023-11-13T10:00:22","date_gmt":"2023-11-13T10:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1817"},"modified":"2023-11-13T15:15:18","modified_gmt":"2023-11-13T15:15:18","slug":"extremism-and-the-good-life-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/extremism-and-the-good-life-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Extremism and the Good Life – Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the previous post<\/a> I have argued that we need to adopt\u00a0 a more complex picture of extremists. They are intellectual and<\/em> practical agents responsive to both intellectual and practical goods. We need to consider how these dimensions interact. How do the practical benefits of extremism interfere with attempts at respecting intellectual agency in the deradicalization process? We need an honest accounting of the ethical costs of deradicalization, and we need a story about how those costs pose barriers to deradicalization.<\/p>\n

To illustrate, let me identify some elements of the good life deradicalization requires sacrificing.<\/p>\n

First, and most obviously, extremist groups offer value and meaning in the form of relationships and community. For some, extremist ideology isn\u2019t just a belief-system; it is the \u201cglue\u201d that holds together friendships and family.[1]<\/a> Megan Phelps-Roper \u2013 a former rising star in the Westboro Baptist Church, a homophobic, fundamentalist Christian church \u2013 has recently written about the \u201cvacuum of meaning and purpose and community\u201d her exit from the church left in her, saying leaving meant she\u2019d lost almost everyone she\u2019d ever loved.[2]<\/a> For people like Megan, abandoning extremism means losing love, and all the life-defining and life-sustaining goods that depend on that love.<\/p>\n

Second, by presenting the world in exaggerated simplicity, extremism enables escape from the burdens of agency. We find ourselves free in a sometimes overwhelmingly complex world. It\u2019s hard to know what to believe or how to act. But we must believe and we must act. Freedom can be experienced both as a blessing and as a curse. As Hoffer writes, \u201cFreedom of choice places the whole blame of failure on the shoulders of the individual. And as freedom encourages a multiplicity of attempts, it unavoidably multiplies failure and frustration.\u201d[3]<\/a> This is a theme that pervades existentialist writing, represented nicely by Jean-Paul Sartre\u2019s notion of \u201canguish.\u201d Imagine walking on a narrow path next to a chasm without any guardrail. You may fear falling into the chasm, but you experience anguish<\/em> to the extent that you\u2019re frightened not of falling into the chasm but of throwing yourself into it.[4]<\/a> Less metaphorically, lots of things can go wrong in a person\u2019s life, but some things go wrong because<\/em> of her decisions. Consciousness of this aspect of one\u2019s agency can be experienced as an oppressive burden. Extremism relieves this burden. It wipes away the messy picture of the world and replaces it with a clean, clear, and crisp black and white picture. It tells you who the good guys are and who the bad guys are. It tells you how you should behave and what you should think. What is right and what is wrong. What is true and what is false. What exactly the world should be like. No nuance. No complexity. Just a refreshingly unblemished perspective on what to think and how to act. Extremism eases the burdens of agency.<\/p>\n

Nietzsche thinks yearning for this kind of relief from the burdens of agency \u2013 being \u201cutterly desperate for some \u2018thou shalt\u2019\u201d \u2013 signifies weakness and a diseased will.[5]<\/a> Personally, I think the relief sounds nice. I wish<\/em> the world were as scrutable as extremists make it out to be. (I\u2019ll let you infer what Nietzsche would think of me!) I don\u2019t think I\u2019m alone in this. Institutions, groups, and individuals tap into this desire. Writing of the value clarity in games, for example, C. Thi Nguyen explains, \u201cIn games, we know exactly what we should be doing, and exactly how well we\u2019ve done. Games offer us a momentary refuge from the nauseating complexity of real world values. They are an existential balm.\u201d[6]<\/a> The same goes for extremism. The value clarity extremist groups present to their members can provide an antidote to the sometimes crushing burdens of agency.<\/p>\n

Consider what all this means for deradicalization. When we ask someone to abandon their extremism, we are asking them not simply to change their mind, but to sacrifice love, remove the balm, take up the burdens of agency, and inundate themselves with complexity. We are asking them to give up community and invite anguish into their lives. Of course, many of us have never experienced the pleasure of escaping the burdens of agency in the first place. And perhaps love sustained by the glue of extremist ideology is not a particularly respectable form of love. But it does us no favors pretending that losing this love and taking back up<\/em> the burdens of agency are not significant sacrifices.<\/p>\n

The list of costs does not end here. Deradicalization can require abandoning meaningful devotion to certain ideals;[7]<\/a> it can require sacrificing positions of power and prestige;[8]<\/a> it can require losing a grip on one\u2019s sense of identity; it can be uncomfortably disorienting to rethink your entire worldview; it can require many other painful costs as well.<\/p>\n

But a question remains: What does any of this have to do with the intellectual<\/em> side of deradicalization? If we want to avoid treating extremists as merely practically self-interested creatures and treat them, also, as intellectual agents, why does it matter if deradicalization bears ethical costs? If truth isn\u2019t on their side, they should revise their beliefs, plain and simple.<\/p>\n

For any rational attempt at deradicalization to succeed \u2013 for reasons, arguments, and evidence to make a serious dent in an extremist\u2019s worldview \u2013 we need extremists\u2019 attention and we need their follow-through to genuinely reflect on those reasons and then to choose to pay the ethical costs of deradicalization. Confronting that choice may itself prevent the reasons from penetrating extremists\u2019 minds. Here again is Megan Phelps-Roper reflecting on her state of mind as she first began contemplating leaving her church:<\/p>\n

There was no way to consider the magnitude of the devastation that I would soon forever be cut off from everyone I had ever loved: my faculties simply shut down before I could even approach that reality. I was betraying my mother. \u2026 How could I leave her? Monstrous<\/em>.[9]<\/a><\/p>\n

Merely contemplating<\/em> leaving her church and her family filled Megan with unmanageable fear threatening her sense of self by casting her as a monster.[10]<\/a> So, she understandably suppressed the thought. Or rather, as she describes her experience, her faculties shut down<\/em> before she could even truly consider losing everyone she loved. This is the key to understanding the way potential ethical costs interfere with intellectual attempts at deradicalization.<\/p>\n

Which thoughts we let in, which thoughts we genuinely entertain, which thoughts we allow ourselves<\/em> to seriously consider is constrained by the ethical costs our practical self anticipates paying if those thoughts take root in our mind. If allowing those thoughts to bloom (or fester) means inviting crushing burdens, losing loved ones, and perhaps even losing oneself, better to nip them in the bud\u2014push them away and ignore them. There is nothing special about extremists in this regard. Even if many philosophers\u2019 minds don\u2019t work like this (or if they wouldn\u2019t admit that their minds work like this), I suspect it applies to most people some of the time. It\u2019s just that because a certain set of practical benefits predictably accompany extremism, the kind of thinking deradicalization involves typically forces extremists to confront the limits of thought enforced by their practical selves. The ethical costs of deradicalization are steep. Extremists must have in them at least a trace of willingness to pay them before their epistemic agency can genuinely engage with intellectual reasons to deradicalize.<\/p>\n

Now, to be sure different extremist groups will be more or less successful at supplying individuals with elements of the good life. And on balance deradicalization will probably be good for the extremist. But the point is that any attempt to elicit a genuinely reasoned response to intellectual reasons to deradicalize will have to contend with the thought suppression that predictably accompanies the prospect of paying the ethical costs of deradicalization.<\/p>\n

What I think this means for deradicalization is that extremists not only need to overcome feelings of fear or betrayal that prevent them from attending to intellectual reasons to deradicalize; they also need to feel like they have something worth deradicalizing for\u2014that they would not be paying the ethical costs of deradicalization for nothing. Neither community nor particular relationships are fungible. Still, if these are among the factors anchoring individuals in extremism, achieving deradicalization may require supplying extremists not only with an alternative vision, but an alternative lifestyle in which to participate, filled with ethical goods comparable to if not fully compensating for those provided by their extremist life. Achieving deradicalization requires offering extremists a glimpse of a different good life.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Author would like to thank Majo Buteler, Marcello Cabral, Quassim Cassam, Thi Nguyen, Luis Oliveira, and the students in my extremism seminar for discussion of these issues.<\/p>\n

Photo by Marianna Smiley<\/a> on Unsplash<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Notes:<\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> Saslow (2018: 190).<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> Phelps-Roper (2019: 166).<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> Hoffer (1951: 31).<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Sartre (1943\/2018: 66-7).<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> Nietzsche (1974: \u00a7347).<\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> Nguyen (MS) \u201cValue Capture\u201d<\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> Paul Katsafanas analyzes connections between devotion and fanaticism in his intriguing (2022).<\/p>\n

[8]<\/a> See Tracy Llanera\u2019s (2023) work on women in misogynistic extremist groups.<\/p>\n

[9]<\/a> Phelps-Roper (2019: 166)<\/p>\n

[10]<\/a> Things are even worse for many religious extremists. From the perspective of their religion, even thinking<\/em> of leaving the faith amounts to surrendering oneself to evil by giving in to temptations from the devil. Imagine how hard you might fight the temptation to think something that would itself make you evil and lead to your eternal damnation.<\/p>\n

References:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Battaly, H. (2023) Can Fanaticism be a Liberatory Virtue? Synthese<\/em> 201: 1-27.<\/p>\n

Berger, J.M. (2018) Extremism<\/em>. MIT Press.<\/p>\n

Cassam, Q. (2022) Extremism: A Philosophical Analysis<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Hoffer, E. (1951) The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements<\/em>. Harper & Row Publishers.<\/p>\n

Katsafanas, P. (2022) Philosophy of Devotion: The Longing for Invulnerable ideals<\/em>. Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Llanera, T. (2023) The Misogyny Paradox and the Alt-Right. Hypatia<\/em> 1-20. doi:10.1017\/hyp.2023.4<\/p>\n

Morton, J. (2019) Moving Up Without Losing Your Way: The Ethical Costs of Upward Mobility<\/em>. Princeton University Press.<\/p>\n

Munro, D. (2023) Cults, Conspiracies, and Fantasies of Knowledge. Episteme<\/em> 1-22. doi:10.1017\/epi.2022.55<\/p>\n

Nietzsche, F. (1974) The Gay Science<\/em>. Trans. W. Kaufmann. Vintage.<\/p>\n

Phelps-Roper, M. (2019) Unfollow: A Memoir of Loving and Leaving the Westboro Baptist Church<\/em>. Farrar, Strous, and Giroux.<\/p>\n

Nguyen, C. T. (MS) Value Capture.<\/p>\n

Sartre, J. (1943\/2018) Being and Nothingness<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Saslow, E. (2018) Rising out of Hatred: The Awakening of a Former White Nationalist<\/em>. Doubleday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In the previous post I have argued that we need to adopt\u00a0 a more complex picture of extremists. They are intellectual and practical agents responsive to both intellectual and practical […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1815,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Josh DiPaolo \"Extremism and the Good Life - Part 2\" on Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[419],"custom_author":[420],"class_list":["post-1817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-extremism","custom_author-dipaolo-josh"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-tj","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1810,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/extremism-and-the-good-life-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":1817,"position":0},"title":"Extremism and the Good Life – Part 1","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"October 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWant to live the good life? Join an extremist group!\u201d This odd piece of advice flies in the face of thousands of years of ethical theorizing, not to mention common sense. In ancient Greece, Aristotle famously identified the flourishing life with a virtuous life that avoids extremes. Not long after,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/Broken-Statue-Black-and-White-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/Broken-Statue-Black-and-White-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/Broken-Statue-Black-and-White-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/Broken-Statue-Black-and-White-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/Broken-Statue-Black-and-White-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/Broken-Statue-Black-and-White-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2065,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/extreme-belief-systems\/","url_meta":{"origin":1817,"position":1},"title":"Extreme belief systems","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In Kirill Srebrennikov\u2019s 2016 film, The Student, Venia, a lonely high school student begins to intensely read the bible and appeal to it for everything he says and does. Through this, he becomes a disruptive presence in his school, interrupting classes and physical education. Venia radicalises himself and becomes a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1853,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-to-take-an-extremist-seriously\/","url_meta":{"origin":1817,"position":2},"title":"How to take an extremist seriously","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"With the rise of polarization and support for right-wing populism, there is a call to take seriously the perspectives of those who seemingly turn away from liberal democratic ideals. But what if this involves taking persons seriously who are in the grip of QAnon, racism, climate change denialism, or The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/can-exposure-to-fake-news-damage-our-intellectual-character\/","url_meta":{"origin":1817,"position":3},"title":"Can Exposure to \u201cFake News\u201d Damage Our Intellectual Character?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"January 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"There is no denying the current widespread interest in the phenomenon of \u201cfake news\u201d. Reflection on the quality of recent political debates has fuelled concerns about the use of inaccurate and misleading stories and statistics. In response, politicians have begun proposing legislation to combat the spread of misleading information, while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/01\/hoax-2097365_1280.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":869,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-right-to-know-and-the-duty-to-inform-a-lesson-from-the-italian-experience-with-covid-19\/","url_meta":{"origin":1817,"position":4},"title":"The Right to Know and the Duty to Inform: A Lesson from the Italian Experience with Covid-19","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"March 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Note: When I drafted this post, the situation in Italy and in many countries around the globe was not as tragic as it is today. Some might worry that the size of the tragedy makes my considerations pointless. Quite to the contrary, I think that the most recent developments of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/03\/110967369_f77b67826e_w.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2274,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/intellectual-virtues-online-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":1817,"position":5},"title":"Intellectual Virtues Online \u2013 Part 2","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In my last entry, I praised the advantages of intellectual virtues in an online environment. This time, I briefly consider why too much of a focus on intellectual virtues might not be the best solution for the problematic aspects of the Internet after all. I discuss two issues, though they\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/service-pnp-det-4a20000-4a25000-4a25600-4a25686v.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/service-pnp-det-4a20000-4a25000-4a25600-4a25686v.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/service-pnp-det-4a20000-4a25000-4a25600-4a25686v.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/05\/service-pnp-det-4a20000-4a25000-4a25600-4a25686v.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/Broken-Statue-Black-and-White-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1817"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1817\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1828,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1817\/revisions\/1828"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1815"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1817"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}