{"id":1703,"date":"2023-05-29T10:00:08","date_gmt":"2023-05-29T09:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1703"},"modified":"2023-05-26T19:58:01","modified_gmt":"2023-05-26T18:58:01","slug":"reflection-on-values-makes-conversations-more-fruitful","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/reflection-on-values-makes-conversations-more-fruitful\/","title":{"rendered":"Reflection on values makes conversations more fruitful"},"content":{"rendered":"

People often find it difficult to listen to the views of those with whom they disagree. For example, in the UK, oftentimes members of the same family consciously shun discussions of controversial topics such as Brexit<\/a>. In the USA, Democrats and Republicans are equally motivated to avoid<\/a> engaging with each other. This animosity is at least partly driven by perceiving the other group as being overall more different to the own group than they actually are. In fact, research<\/a> has shown that in the USA people tend to overestimate the differences on average by a factor of two across many variables such as attitudes towards women or minorities (of course, for some variables the difference is substantially larger than for others).<\/p>\n

Animosity makes compromises much harder to reach, even when they are needed for democratic decision making. Researchers have proposed different ways to get people to show less hostility towards, and engage more openly with, members of opposing groups. For example, it has been shown that<\/a> reminding people that they have more in common<\/a> than they think with members of groups they dislike, can diminish people\u2019s hostility towards those groups. More recently, some researchers have argued that receptiveness to opposing views <\/a>\u00a0and intellectual humility<\/a> lie at the heart of healthy debates.<\/p>\n

Intellectual humility, for instance, is the disposition to own or accept one\u2019s own intellectual shortcomings out of a genuine desire for knowledge and truth<\/a>. It is about developing an increased awareness that one does not have all the answers and that it is possible that one\u2019s views might be mistaken. Intellectually humble attitudes make one more open to appreciating other people\u2019s views, without being uncritical. In politics, intellectual humility facilitates willingness to learn<\/a> about opposing political perspectives.<\/p>\n

By recognizing and embracing one’s own limitations, individuals are more likely to engage in active listening and adopt a curiosity-driven mindset that allows them to better comprehend and appreciate diverse viewpoints (Krumrei-Mancuso & Rouse, 2016<\/a>). This mindset mitigates dogmatism and rigidity in discussions and promotes an environment conducive to collaborative problem-solving (Leary et al., 2017<\/a>). By fostering intellectual humility, individuals can contribute to more civil, productive, and inclusive discourse across various domains, from politics to intergroup relations, ultimately paving the way for more informed decision-making and social progress.<\/p>\n

In our recent research<\/a>, we tested whether we can experimentally enhance intellectual humility. For this, we used an approach called value-affirmation, whereby people reflect on one or two cherished personal values. Previous research has found<\/a> that a brief period of reflection on personal values may increase the sense of self-integrity in the face of perceived threats<\/a>, and, consequently, this reflection makes people more thoughtful and open-minded in response to persuasive text that challenges their views.<\/p>\n

In our experiment, we invited participants in groups of 2 or 3 to the lab. After completing a range of psychological questionnaires, half of the groups were asked to reflect about their most important value (e.g., freedom, equality), and explain in writing the significance that their chosen value has in their lives and how it informs their behaviour. Afterwards, participants took part in a 15-minute audio- and video-recorded group discussion about the pros and cons of raising student tuition fees to pay for university education. A confederate \u2013 someone who, on behalf of the experimenter, pretended to be a participant \u2013 challenged the participants’ statements if there was a risk of them agreeing too quickly with each other..<\/p>\n

The recordings of participants\u2019 debates were later analysed by linguists from our team for conversational markers that would indicate high or low intellectual humility. They coded contributions to discussions along several dimensions including tendencies to dominate the floor, to engage with others\u2019 opinions, or to boost one\u2019s own convictions as certain, obvious, and unchallengeable.<\/p>\n

As expected, participants who reflected about their most important value engaged in the discussion in a more humble way compared to participants in the control group. For example, they showed themselves more supportive of other speakers even when they disagreed; they avoided dominating discussions; they showed a reduced tendency to treat their own opinions as self-evident and not up for debate. Additionally, participants reported feeling more empathic, giving, grateful, and humble.<\/p>\n

In sum, our research demonstrated that intellectual humility in debate can be enhanced through a relatively simple intervention. Put numerically, 60.6% of participants in the value-affirmation condition showed more intellectual humility in debate than the average person in the control condition. This finding, and to some extent the concomitant effect on prosocial emotion, promises to improve the quality of discussions on controversial issues. Nevertheless, more evidence needs to be collected with different populations and topics before we can be confident that this approach is widely beneficial. We hope the current evidence is sufficient to provoke future research including studies on whether these results replicate on social media.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"People often find it difficult to listen to the views of those with whom they disagree. For example, in the UK, oftentimes members of the same family consciously shun discussions […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1707,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Paul Hanel \"Reflection on values makes conversations more fruitful\" on Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[67,134,394],"custom_author":[393],"class_list":["post-1703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-intellectual-humility","tag-self-affirmation","tag-values","custom_author-hanel-paul"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-rt","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2169,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-affective-in-affective-polarization\/","url_meta":{"origin":1703,"position":0},"title":"The \u201caffective\u201d in affective polarization","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Public opinion in many contemporary democracies shows increasing signs of polarization. In particular, animosity and dislike across political lines have become increasingly characteristic of Western mass publics (Boxell et al., 2024; Finkel et al., 2020; Wagner, 2024). Several empirical methodologies designed to measure citizens\u2019 opinions, which include questions about their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/affective1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/affective1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/affective1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/12\/affective1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1853,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-to-take-an-extremist-seriously\/","url_meta":{"origin":1703,"position":1},"title":"How to take an extremist seriously","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"With the rise of polarization and support for right-wing populism, there is a call to take seriously the perspectives of those who seemingly turn away from liberal democratic ideals. But what if this involves taking persons seriously who are in the grip of QAnon, racism, climate change denialism, or The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/12\/daniel-lonn-Regf9o7r_ZM-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":596,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/intellectual-humility-from-views-of-knowledge-to-views-of-people\/","url_meta":{"origin":1703,"position":2},"title":"Intellectual humility: from views of knowledge to views of people","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"January 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Researchers have taken a number of approaches to defining intellectual humility. I tend to view intellectual humility as rooted in a healthy independence between intellect and ego (Krumrei-Mancuso & Rouse, 2016). What I mean by this is that intellectual humility involves accepting one's intellectual fallibility without experiencing it as a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/01\/hands_compassion_help_old_care_support_assistance_empathy-891160-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1122,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/emotional-imperialism-in-public-discourse\/","url_meta":{"origin":1703,"position":3},"title":"Emotional Imperialism in Public Discourse","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Alfred Archer\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Benjamin Matheson \u00a0 \u00a0 In order to protest police brutality and racial injustice in the USA, in 2016 the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/02\/Archer8324095.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2113,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/values-and-virtues-in-philosophy-and-psychology\/","url_meta":{"origin":1703,"position":4},"title":"Values and Virtues in Philosophy and Psychology","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"During the recent general election campaign in the UK, I received a flyer through my door from a local independent candidate who claimed to value, among other things, humanitarianism. He also wanted to repurpose the entirety of the UK\u2019s foreign aid budget to fix potholes on Britain\u2019s apparently neglected roads.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Puddle on the ground reflecting a plane in the sky","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/09\/mirror.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/09\/mirror.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/09\/mirror.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/09\/mirror.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":735,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/normalization-practices-make-it-so\/","url_meta":{"origin":1703,"position":5},"title":"Normalization\u2014Practices Make It So","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rising nationalism and nativism around the world generate a toxic brew of arrogance and xenophobia that pits people against one another in often frightening ways. Understanding some discursive mechanisms that undermine our capacities to respond to these forces might help. It has become commonplace for people to worry about the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/09\/lowhangingfruit_54c6-scaled.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/09\/lowhangingfruit_54c6-scaled.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/09\/lowhangingfruit_54c6-scaled.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/09\/lowhangingfruit_54c6-scaled.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/09\/lowhangingfruit_54c6-scaled.jpeg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/09\/lowhangingfruit_54c6-scaled.jpeg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/pointing-6043176_1280.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1703"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1705,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1703\/revisions\/1705"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1707"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1703"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}