{"id":1639,"date":"2023-02-20T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-02-20T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1639"},"modified":"2023-02-17T15:30:41","modified_gmt":"2023-02-17T15:30:41","slug":"narrative-devices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/narrative-devices\/","title":{"rendered":"Narrative Devices"},"content":{"rendered":"

Memory plays an important role in shaping our sense of who and what we are. Our memories about ourselves \u2013 where we were born, where we grew up, the books we read as teenagers, the heartbreaks we have suffered \u2013 form part of the autobiographical narrative of who we understand ourselves to be. To lose our memories and our autobiographical narrative would be disorientating to say the least. Likely devasting. Just think of the film Memento<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Luckily, we do not need to rely solely on our biological memory to store our narratives. We use the world around us. Souvenirs, books, d\u00e9cor, paintings, photographs, diaries, tattoos. All store aspects of our narrative selves, reminding us of who we are \u2013 travellers, romantics, goths, maximalists, cooks, weight-lifters, and so on. Digital technology also helps us remember. GooglePhotos reminds us of the airport we were in this time last year and the beautiful hike the year before. GoodReads record the books we have read. Fitbits record our exercise routines.<\/p>\n

We now carry around digital devices perfectly suited to recording, measuring, and reminding us of the minutiae of our lives. Not only do our phones hold photos, social media profiles, and calendars,self-tracking apps and devices, sometimes automatically, record our sleep cycles, our exercise regimes, our food intake, our weight, our citation rates, our moods, creating a dashboard of information about our bodies, our habits, and our selves. As Richard Heersmink puts it, distributing our narratives onto the world \u201callows us to remember our personal past in a way that is quite different from remembering our past without the aid of objects, allowing us to remember our personal past in a more reliable and detailed manner<\/em>\u201d (Heersmink 2020, 52, my italics).<\/p>\n

We might think, then, with digital technology we have access to an increasingly personalised and specific log of who we are. One that is safe from the ravages of old age and protected from damage. But digital technologies are more than new storage devices for our memories. They can create, shape, even alter our self-narratives. And in potentially pernicious ways.<\/p>\n

Digital devices do not just allow us to offload information about ourselves onto the world to be preserved. They create and provide us with new information about ourselves. Before my phone started counting my steps, I had no idea how far I walked each day. Now, as I smugly look at my weeks of completed 10,000-a-day step records, I have not distributed my narrative about being an active healthy person. The records create<\/em> this narrative.<\/p>\n

Surely providing new information from which to form narratives is helpful? It builds a richer picture of who we are. Yet, in furnishing us with data about our historic actions and bodily states and processes, digital devices can also mould the way that we understand and value ourselves. In supplying us with quantified measurements about our bodies and our activities, self-tracking devices promote quantified frameworks for self-understanding. Am I healthy? Let me check my step count. Am I clever? Let me check my google citation rate. Am I productive? Well, I\u2019ve met my words-per-day writing achievement this week.<\/p>\n

Indeed, my phone often tells me how to interpret the data it provides me\u00a0 \u2013 congratulating me on a pre-set BMI goal or a step-count achievement, chiding me for being lazy (looking at you Duolingo). The data comes pre-packaged in a narrative wrapper. It tells<\/em> me what kind of a person I am. Our devices, then, do not just help us remember, they tell us what to remember and how.<\/p>\n

But quantified data does not always ground accurate self-narratives \u2013 our high number of Twitter followers may give us the impression that we are popular yet work to mask our real loneliness. And as C. Thi Nguyen points out: \u201cstep counts are not the same as health, and citation rates are not the same as wisdom\u201d (2021, 229). We also might worry that narratives that cannot be quantified, such as being a supportive colleague or a patient friend, fall out of the picture as we cannot log these in our digital devices. Digital devices might save us a lot of work by serving up narratives to us, but they might not tell us the real, or even the whole, story. And while we might rightly point out that we can simply ignore or deny the narratives our digital devices tell us, the whiff of objectivity that data gives off might make it difficult for us to let these tales go.<\/p>\n

Distributing our narratives onto digital technology does not, then, necessarily give us more reliable self-narratives. Apps and devices that purport to track ourselves <\/em>promote specific ways of interpreting and recording our activities and habits, thus shaping the kinds of narratives we form. We should, therefore, be mindful that while using digital devices for recording and storing aspects of our lives can be incredibly helpful, it could open us up to a kind of narrative railroading \u2013 where our digital devices encourage us to develop, focus on, and sustain certain self-narratives over others.<\/p>\n

Our trepidation may deepen when we think about how designers of digital technology might benefit from this narrative railroading. The kinds of narratives that digital self-tracking devices typically promote often are underpinned by neo-liberal values (Lupton 2016). Our phones regularly nudge us to become fitter, healthier, and more productive. Perhaps this is not always a bad thing. But pushing these values can render us more exploitable workers and citizens. It also might drive a standardisation or homogenisation of narratives. A cynic could note that individuals with similar self-narratives are easy to predict and sell to \u2013 handy for any company. So perhaps we should be asking not only what narratives digital devices might promote but who might benefit from promoting them.<\/p>\n

Narratives are not simply stories that we tell about ourselves, they are<\/em> our selves. What we remember shapes who we are, influences how we act, what we desire and aim for, how we react and respond to situations. What we record matters. How matters too. Narratives have power and, when we hand over control of our narratives, we quite literally hand over power over our selves.<\/p>\n

Bibliography <\/strong><\/p>\n

Heersmink, R. (2020). Narrative niche construction: Memory ecologies and distributed narrative identities.\u00a0Biology & Philosophy<\/em>,\u00a035(5), 1-23.<\/p>\n

Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self<\/em>. John Wiley & Sons.<\/p>\n

Nguyen, C. T. (2021). The seductions of clarity.\u00a0Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements<\/em>,\u00a089, 227-255.<\/p>\n

Photo by Simon Daoudi<\/a> on Unsplash<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Memory plays an important role in shaping our sense of who and what we are. Our memories about ourselves \u2013 where we were born, where we grew up, the books […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1642,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"@LucyOsler on Narrative Devices at Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[377,375,376],"custom_author":[378],"class_list":["post-1639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-digital-devices","tag-memory","tag-narrative","custom_author-osler-lucy"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-qr","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2256,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/digital-technology-and-cognitive-scaffolding\/","url_meta":{"origin":1639,"position":0},"title":"Digital Technology and Cognitive Scaffolding","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"April 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There is much ambivalence about digital technology. On the one hand, it makes many tasks much more efficient than they would otherwise be. We can do a quick internet search to find a phone number instead of scouring the phone book. We can use GPS instead of trying to figure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/04\/Scaffolding.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/04\/Scaffolding.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/04\/Scaffolding.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2025\/04\/Scaffolding.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":967,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/have-we-lost-the-idea-of-a-critical-friend\/","url_meta":{"origin":1639,"position":1},"title":"Have we lost the idea of a critical friend?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"I sometimes wonder, in the age of online and offline echochambers and Facebook friendship bubbles, whether we have lost the ancient idea of a critical friend. I am as guilty here as anyone. I mercilessly unfriend people on Facebook whose views I find abhorrent (or even mildly disturbing), rather than\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/07\/eberhard-grossgasteiger-iIFLDQmXPiw-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/07\/eberhard-grossgasteiger-iIFLDQmXPiw-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/07\/eberhard-grossgasteiger-iIFLDQmXPiw-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/07\/eberhard-grossgasteiger-iIFLDQmXPiw-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/07\/eberhard-grossgasteiger-iIFLDQmXPiw-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/07\/eberhard-grossgasteiger-iIFLDQmXPiw-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/identifying-core-psychological-processes-with-neuroimaging-experiments-to-improve-education-in-practice\/","url_meta":{"origin":1639,"position":2},"title":"Identifying Core Psychological Processes with Neuroimaging Experiments to Improve Education in Practice","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Following my previous post\u00a0for this blog, in this post I discuss why examining psychological processes related to teaching and learning can provide useful insights about how to improve education. Many educators might think that they have their own tacit knowledge about how to make their classroom activities effective and that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1745,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/drill-music-and-epistemic-injustice\/","url_meta":{"origin":1639,"position":3},"title":"Drill Music and Epistemic Injustice","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"What are the legitimate ways of interpreting a musician\u2019s work and words? This might seem like an abstract philosophical question, but it isn\u2019t. This question matters because sometimes music is used to justify interferences with freedom, or used as evidence of criminality in trials that might lead to serious punishment.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/microphone-gf8906a02e_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/microphone-gf8906a02e_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/microphone-gf8906a02e_1280.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/microphone-gf8906a02e_1280.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/08\/microphone-gf8906a02e_1280.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1693,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/a-case-against-the-argument-from-collective-amnesia-and-forgetting\/","url_meta":{"origin":1639,"position":4},"title":"A Case against the Argument from \u201cCollective Amnesia\u201d and \u201cForgetting\u201d","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The term collective amnesia is often used to analyse cases or states in which morally, socially and politically pertinent knowledge, such as knowledge about historical injustices, is (arguably) absent or unavailable in a society\u2019s collective memory. I find this both epistemically inaccurate and problematic and instead propose putting the analytical\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/Altanian_382136-2025423656.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/Altanian_382136-2025423656.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/Altanian_382136-2025423656.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/Altanian_382136-2025423656.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/05\/Altanian_382136-2025423656.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/what-is-google-doing-to-us\/","url_meta":{"origin":1639,"position":5},"title":"What is Google Doing to Us?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"[snippet id=\"305\" label=\"Emma Gordon and Adam Carter\"] By J. Adam Carter and Emma C. Gordon Suppose you wanted to know who the first pope was after St. Peter (answer: Pope Linus, born 10 AD), or what the oldest continuously habited city in the world is (answer: Damascus, Syria, continuously inhabited\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/simon-daoudi-2wFoa040m8g-unsplash-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1639"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1641,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1639\/revisions\/1641"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1642"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1639"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}