{"id":1547,"date":"2022-10-17T10:00:17","date_gmt":"2022-10-17T09:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1547"},"modified":"2022-10-14T16:12:11","modified_gmt":"2022-10-14T15:12:11","slug":"the-social-roots-of-irrationality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-social-roots-of-irrationality\/","title":{"rendered":"The Social Roots of Irrationality"},"content":{"rendered":"

Many animals navigate their environments with the use of internal models. It is tempting to think of human beliefs as just a highly complex example of this strategy. On this view, our beliefs are \u2013 to quote the philosopher Frank Ramsey \u2013 the \u201cmaps by which we steer.\u201d Like maps, they function to provide us with accurate information that we can use in navigating the world, and they are specialised for this role. Because their function is to track how things are, for example, they are highly responsive to evidence concerning how things are.<\/p>\n

Many beliefs are difficult to reconcile with this perspective. Most obviously, if beliefs are the maps by which we steer, why are so many people\u2019s maps so radically misaligned with reality? People often believe in strange supernatural entities and forces, in cartoonish battles between Good and Evil, in bizarre conspiracies, in unfounded hierarchies of race, caste, and gender, and more.<\/p>\n

Of course, in some cases inaccurate beliefs are simply mistakes. People are deceived, they have limited information, and they succumb to various thinking errors. Many unfounded beliefs are difficult to understand as mistakes, however. People are often attached<\/em> to such beliefs. They cling dogmatically to them, scramble around for rationalisations of them, and process any evidence that bears on them in extremely biased ways.<\/p>\n

In trying to understand such tendencies, a long tradition in philosophy, psychoanalysis, and psychology looks inward to the believer\u2019s mind. According to this tradition, self-deception has psychological and emotional functions \u2013 for example, in protecting the ego or self-image, in reducing cognitive dissonance, or in producing reassuring feelings of certainty and control.<\/p>\n

In my work<\/a>, I\u2019ve argued that this perspective is largely mistaken. Drawing on and integrating the research of many others (e.g., 1<\/a>, 2<\/a>, 3<\/a>, and 4<\/a>), I\u2019ve argued that the true origins of many bad beliefs lie not inside the minds of their believers but in the incentives of social life.<\/p>\n

Humans are ultra-social animals, utterly dependent for our success and even survival on the impression that we make on others. The beliefs that we hold influence that impression. That is, beliefs are not just<\/em> maps by which we steer; they are maps that are objects of intense social scrutiny and evaluation. The beliefs that perform well under such observation are sometimes different from \u2013 sometimes radically <\/em>different from \u2013 the beliefs that are best supported by evidence. When people respond to these incentives, the result is socially adaptive beliefs<\/a> \u2013 and some of the most consequential and damaging forms of human irrationality.<\/p>\n

There are two basic categories of socially adaptive beliefs.<\/p>\n

First, we are biased towards beliefs that we benefit from propagating to others<\/a>. At the individual level, this explains strong tendencies towards self-serving and self-enhancing beliefs<\/a>. We inflate our positive qualities, downplay our negative ones, frame our futures in optimistic ways, and interpret our actions and attitudes in a socially attractive light. Once we identify with groups, such tendencies often generalise to group-serving and group-aggrandising beliefs<\/a>, including \u2013 especially under conditions of intergroup conflict \u2013 beliefs that demonise outgroups and justify their maltreatment. In this way tendencies to believe our own propaganda are central to everything from everyday self-deception to prejudice, conspiracy theories, and system-justifying ideologies.<\/p>\n

Second, we are biased towards beliefs that signal our traits and loyalties. Humans are obsessive impression managers. We shape almost every aspect of our behaviour in the service of displaying \u2013 and often exaggerating \u2013 our socially attractive qualities and allegiances to different communities. These signalling motivations don\u2019t stop at outward behaviour, however. They mould our beliefs and worldviews. For example, we often believe not to get at the truth but to signal our group identities and loyalties<\/a> and to display our willingness to conform to local norms<\/a>. The signalling functions of beliefs are thus relevant to understanding everything from political beliefs<\/a> to modern culture wars<\/a>, from conspiracy theories<\/a> to the emergence of monotheistic religions<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Of course, it never feels <\/em>that one\u2019s beliefs are influenced by social incentives. Everyone upholds a comforting illusion of objectivity<\/a>, bolstered by strategic cognitive biases and post hoc rationalisations. Moreover, when socially adaptive beliefs align in communities of co-believers, this illusion is often amplified and protected through subtle forms of social cooperation and coordination<\/a>. We reward those who do the hard work required to justify our preferred beliefs, for example, and we shun and ostracise those who challenge them.<\/p>\n

Why does this social perspective on irrational beliefs matter?<\/p>\n

First, if we think of self-deception as a defensive response to a painful or distressing reality, eliminating self-deception is best left to individuals, and we should not be very hopeful they will succeed. In contrast, if how people think and reason is highly sensitive to social incentives, we can try to re-design our social worlds so that they reward more rational forms of thought. Reality will never cease to be painful or distressing, but the social norms with which we evaluate, condemn, and reward beliefs and reasoning can change and improve.<\/p>\n

Second, once we understand that many unfounded beliefs are responses to social incentives, this should reconfigure our understanding of those who hold such beliefs. There is and always has been a strong temptation to understand bad beliefs as produced by a combination of propaganda and popular credulity. This perspective is misguided. People are neither stupid nor gullible; they are rational and vigilant<\/a>. Given people\u2019s social goals, however, many unfounded beliefs are rational responses to social incentives. To address such cases, we will make more progress attending to the social conditions that make certain beliefs attractive than by focusing on the more familiar bogeymen of misinformation and gullibility.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Picture: Charles De Luvio on Unsplash<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Many animals navigate their environments with the use of internal models. It is tempting to think of human beliefs as just a highly complex example of this strategy. On this […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1550,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Beliefs as responsive to social incentives. @DanWilliamsPhil \"The Social Roots of Irrationality\" on Open for Debate.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[184,360,153],"custom_author":[359],"class_list":["post-1547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-belief","tag-cooperation","tag-motivated-cognition","custom_author-williams-daniel"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-oX","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":717,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/do-we-have-the-will-to-change-what-we-believe\/","url_meta":{"origin":1547,"position":0},"title":"Do we have the will to change what we believe?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"A tweet made it to the United States\u2019 front page of Reddit.com on July 21st 2019 from the subreddit, r\/GetMotivated. The tweet, originally from @michaelmiraflor, read, \u201cUnfollow [Instagram] models and influencers. Start following artists and designers. Your entire outlook on life will change\u201d. The tweet expresses something intuitively true: what\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/07\/MichaelMiralflor3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1287,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/prejudiced-belief-epistemic-and-moral-perspectives\/","url_meta":{"origin":1547,"position":1},"title":"Prejudiced Belief: Epistemic and Moral Perspectives","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Prejudice seems like a paradigmatic case of bad belief. But in what sense bad? Suppose we could agree that prejudiced beliefs tend to be false. That would be one way for them to bad: beliefs, we might think, should aim at the truth; false beliefs fall short in that important\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/09\/violence-against-women-1169348_1280-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/09\/violence-against-women-1169348_1280-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/09\/violence-against-women-1169348_1280-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/09\/violence-against-women-1169348_1280-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/09\/violence-against-women-1169348_1280-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1516,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/thoughts-for-sale\/","url_meta":{"origin":1547,"position":2},"title":"Thoughts for Sale","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"My father spent his career working in production for large bakeries, supervising and troubleshooting the mass production of bread and buns. He would get up at 5:00 in the morning, put on his \u201cwhites,\u201d and head to work with his blue helmet in tow. Workers at his plant fell into\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/09\/Navy_baker_and_assistant_removing_loaves_of_bread_from_oven_at_the_Naval_Training_Center_San_Diego_California._-_NARA_-_295582.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/09\/Navy_baker_and_assistant_removing_loaves_of_bread_from_oven_at_the_Naval_Training_Center_San_Diego_California._-_NARA_-_295582.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/09\/Navy_baker_and_assistant_removing_loaves_of_bread_from_oven_at_the_Naval_Training_Center_San_Diego_California._-_NARA_-_295582.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/09\/Navy_baker_and_assistant_removing_loaves_of_bread_from_oven_at_the_Naval_Training_Center_San_Diego_California._-_NARA_-_295582.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2065,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/extreme-belief-systems\/","url_meta":{"origin":1547,"position":3},"title":"Extreme belief systems","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In Kirill Srebrennikov\u2019s 2016 film, The Student, Venia, a lonely high school student begins to intensely read the bible and appeal to it for everything he says and does. Through this, he becomes a disruptive presence in his school, interrupting classes and physical education. Venia radicalises himself and becomes a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2024\/07\/interior-small-church-countryside-with-wooden-benches-opened-door-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1149,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-ethics-of-belief-its-not-just-trump-supporters-who-believe-wrongly-its-all-of-us\/","url_meta":{"origin":1547,"position":4},"title":"The Ethics of Belief: It\u2019s not just Trump supporters who believe wrongly\u2014it\u2019s all of us","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"March 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"As the dust settles on the Trump presidency, we are left to reflect on its many themes. One of its most fundamental was this: believing without adequate evidence. Many aspects of the last four years fit this theme, but we saw this most vividly with Trump\u2019s repeated denial of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/03\/Minds-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/03\/Minds-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/03\/Minds-3.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/03\/Minds-3.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/03\/Minds-3.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1677,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/can-people-be-epistemically-blameworthy\/","url_meta":{"origin":1547,"position":5},"title":"Can People Be Epistemically Blameworthy?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"April 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"We blame people for lots of things, such as stealing from others, forgetting our birthday, and voting for our political opponents. But it also seems that we sometimes blame people for their beliefs, and the way they respond to evidence. Holding inconsistent beliefs, applying epistemic standards unfairly, or being prone\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"A pointing finger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/blame.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/blame.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/blame.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/blame.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/04\/blame.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/10\/charlesdeluvio-AT5vuPoi8vc-unsplash-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1547"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1547\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1551,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1547\/revisions\/1551"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1547"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}