{"id":1516,"date":"2022-09-05T10:00:43","date_gmt":"2022-09-05T09:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1516"},"modified":"2022-09-02T11:16:32","modified_gmt":"2022-09-02T10:16:32","slug":"thoughts-for-sale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/thoughts-for-sale\/","title":{"rendered":"Thoughts for Sale"},"content":{"rendered":"

My father spent his career working in production for large bakeries, supervising and troubleshooting the mass production of bread and buns. He would get up at 5:00 in the morning, put on his \u201cwhites,\u201d and head to work with his blue helmet in tow. Workers at his plant fell into one of two major categories: production or sales. Production was all about making a quality product \u2013 hot dog buns for the 4th<\/sup> of July. Sales was about convincing people to buy it. The plant managers who ran the entire operation invariably were drawn from sales. I resented this \u2013 for my father\u2019s sake \u2013 as I thought that actually making<\/em> a product is more important than selling it.<\/p>\n

Nowadays, your average pharmaceutical rep makes twice as much as the chemist who produces the medicine. There is more money to be made by being skilled at taking doctors out for golf and drinks than there is in mastering chemistry. Once again, sales over production.<\/p>\n

This emphasis on sales is not only an economic reality. Rather, it is a deep fact of life that pervades nature itself. We see this with the distinction, central to biological theory, between natural selection and sexual selection. Natural selection is the mechanism by which traits that are conducive to survival are shaped and differentially replicate. Birds that are swift at flight and which have excellent eyesight are at a competitive advantage. This is production, the making of a quality biological product. Sexual selection is about the selection of traits that are conducive to success on the mating market. Even if an overly large and ornate tail feather impedes a peacock\u2019s chances of surviving, it increases its chances on the dating scene. It is all about sales \u2013 convincing peahens to \u201cbuy\u201d the product. And so much<\/em> is invested into such salesmanship! (Technically, sexual selection is a form of natural selection. But its role is so important and distinctive that it deserves its own category, mirroring the sales divisions that we find in the business world.)<\/p>\n

These observations should be old hat. What I do not think is old hat, however, is the observation that our minds are also designed with both production and sales in mind<\/em>. A growing group of philosophers and cognitive scientists have started to argue that the mind \u2013 like a business that needs sales \u2013 is shaped to perform social functions. For my own part, I have focused on belief \u2013 how we represent the world in thought. It has long been assumed that we have beliefs to help us better navigate the world and achieve our goals by aiding means-end reasoning. This is why we value the truth so much: true beliefs make us more successful at getting what we want. You will make better dietary decisions if you have true beliefs about the nutritional value of foods, better financial decisions if the earnings reports you receive are true, and so on. Like swiftness and keen eyesight for birds, true beliefs make us more fit for our environments. When Mother Nature produces minds, she should favor brains that accurately track the truth just like my father favored loaves of bread that weren\u2019t defective.<\/p>\n

But beliefs are not only private and personal states that guide our actions. Other people detect our beliefs and care about them. Beliefs are detected through a process that psychologists and philosophers call mindreading<\/em>. While this might sound like a superpower, it is a completely natural and common ability for human beings. We read people\u2019s minds \u2013 that is, figure out what they believe, want, and feel \u2013 by listening to their words, considering their behavior, scrutinizing their facial expressions, and so on. And we care<\/em> about what other people think. We treat people differently based on the beliefs that we attribute to them. \u201cI don\u2019t want to be friends with someone who believes that a woman\u2019s place is in the kitchen!\u201d \u201cI want to hire him, because he believes in himself!\u201d \u201cThat person is like me \u2013 she knows that Covid is a hoax.\u201d<\/p>\n

In all these ways, the beliefs that are attributed to someone change how they are treated. This introduces selection pressure<\/em> on the beliefs. Certain beliefs can be favored not because they are accurate (even if they are<\/em> accurate!) but because they are popular, convey confidence, indicate a tribal identity, and so on. This is where salesmanship<\/em> becomes important to shaping the mind. A certain brand of bread might sell well because the bakery has built strong relationships with the local grocery stores, not because the bread itself is especially good. Similarly, certain thoughts will be selected (hardwired, imitated, or learned) because they are socially desirable whether or not they are true.<\/p>\n

These social functions for belief introduce distortions, just like sexual selection distorts the size and color of tail feathers. Beliefs might move away from the truth just like the feather moves away from the ideal form for flight. But there are some differences. First, beliefs are not distorted merely to better secure mates. They are also distorted to land jobs, make friends, or show loyalty. Second, beliefs are not only distorted through biological evolution, but also by cultural evolution and individual learning. We are shaped and rewarded to have beliefs that garner social benefits.<\/p>\n

The pressure of salesmanship introduces liabilities as well as benefits. Your Covid skepticism might benefit you in social settings in which that belief is dominant. But it also harms you when it causes you to say no to the vaccine. Your unwarranted confidence might impress others and land you a job. But it also can lead you to take on tasks that are beyond your true abilities. In reckoning these tradeoffs, the costs incurred by deviating from the truth should not exceed the social benefits.<\/p>\n

Elsewhere<\/a>, I have argued that we should think of many beliefs with social functions as literally being signals<\/em>. The purpose of a red traffic light is purely communicative: it exists to let drivers know that they need to stop. Likewise, we believe some things only to communicate facts about ourselves to others. Someone might believe in the Trinity only because it communicates their Christian identity. Someone might deny anthropogenic climate change because it communicates that they are a committed Republican. Someone might believe that the vaccine is ineffective because it shows their loyalty to President Trump.<\/p>\n

I do not think that people are consciously aware of their motives for believing in these ways. Undoubtedly, there is a lot of self-deception at work. There are real incentives to have these beliefs and process information to support pre-established conclusions. We surrender truth for the sake of the social benefits that our beliefs communicate. We are willing to put our thoughts up for sale. This is not always dangerous. But when it is, the remedy is not merely to provide better information, since people have incentives to dismiss or rationalize away whatever evidence we might provide them. Instead, we need to change the incentives so that the social benefits of distorted belief fade or accurate belief is recognized as being more valuable. Just as we should engineer our economic world so that well-made products prevail, we must engineer our information and social networks so as to disincentivize reckless belief signaling.<\/p>\n

Picture: Navy baker and assistant removing loaves of bread from oven at the Naval Training Center, San Diego, California from Wikimedia Commons<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"My father spent his career working in production for large bakeries, supervising and troubleshooting the mass production of bread and buns. He would get up at 5:00 in the morning, […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1519,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Eric Funkhouser \"Thoughts for Sale\" on Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[184,356],"custom_author":[355],"class_list":["post-1516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-belief","tag-signaling","custom_author-funkhouser-m-eric"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-os","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1080,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/not-so-ignorant-after-all-metaknowledge-matters-more-than-knowledge\/","url_meta":{"origin":1516,"position":0},"title":"Not so Ignorant After All: Metaknowledge Matters More than Knowledge","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In one way or another, democracies put political power in the hands of the people.\u00a0 A perennial worry about democracy, voiced almost as soon as it was invented, is that it places power in the hands of the ignorant. To some extent, this worry reflects an elitist condescension, but there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/12\/vote.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1594,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/deepfakes-and-the-history-of-faked-photography\/","url_meta":{"origin":1516,"position":1},"title":"Deepfakes and the History of Faked Photography","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"January 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Looking back at the panicked discussion of deepfakes in 2018, actually existing deepfake technology has been something of a disappointment. The r\/deepfakeSFW subreddit is full of hobbyists face swapping cult films. The most common genre of deepfake is the face-swapped pornographic video. These videos clearly portray a message about the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/Image_appert_ernest_charles_photomontage_montrant_une_representation_de_la_prison_des_chantiers_a_versaill_1602819_cropped.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/Image_appert_ernest_charles_photomontage_montrant_une_representation_de_la_prison_des_chantiers_a_versaill_1602819_cropped.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/Image_appert_ernest_charles_photomontage_montrant_une_representation_de_la_prison_des_chantiers_a_versaill_1602819_cropped.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/Image_appert_ernest_charles_photomontage_montrant_une_representation_de_la_prison_des_chantiers_a_versaill_1602819_cropped.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/Image_appert_ernest_charles_photomontage_montrant_une_representation_de_la_prison_des_chantiers_a_versaill_1602819_cropped.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/01\/Image_appert_ernest_charles_photomontage_montrant_une_representation_de_la_prison_des_chantiers_a_versaill_1602819_cropped.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1767,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/corporations-the-power-of-possibility-and-the-possibilities-of-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":1516,"position":2},"title":"Corporations: the power of possibility and the possibilities of power","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"There is a way of thinking about business corporations which sees them as inherently enemies of social progress.\u00a0 On this view, inspired by Marxist analyses of class conflict and antagonistic capital-labour relations, the actions of businesses are inevitably oppressive.\u00a0 In this blogpost I want to argue for a more nuanced\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/09\/boliviainteligente-Oy3uODf99k0-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/09\/boliviainteligente-Oy3uODf99k0-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/09\/boliviainteligente-Oy3uODf99k0-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/09\/boliviainteligente-Oy3uODf99k0-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/09\/boliviainteligente-Oy3uODf99k0-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/09\/boliviainteligente-Oy3uODf99k0-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1444,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/whats-the-social-approach-to-public-trust-in-science\/","url_meta":{"origin":1516,"position":3},"title":"What\u2019s The Social Approach to Public Trust in Science?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In my previous post , I have argued that, while the COVID-19 pandemic has thrown into stark relief the practical importance of public trust in science, the dominant, individualistic approach to public trust in science is woefully inadequate. In this post, I provide a (very minimal) sketch of an alternative\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/contessa0_0_image001.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/contessa0_0_image001.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/contessa0_0_image001.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/contessa0_0_image001.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/contessa0_0_image001.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/05\/contessa0_0_image001.png?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":531,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/bullshit-you-can-believe-in\/","url_meta":{"origin":1516,"position":4},"title":"Bullshit You Can Believe In","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"November 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. So begins Harry Frankfurt\u2019s rightly celebrated essay On Bullshit, raising the important questions of precisely what bullshit is and why there is so much of it around. That sentence is particularly poignant now, three\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/11\/140521-F-LR006-054.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/11\/140521-F-LR006-054.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/11\/140521-F-LR006-054.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/11\/140521-F-LR006-054.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":542,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-empathy-defense-emmett-till-open-casket-and-white-empathy\/","url_meta":{"origin":1516,"position":5},"title":"The Empathy Defense: Emmett Till, “Open Casket,” and ‘White Empathy’","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA painting of a dead black boy by a white artist.\u201d This is British artist Hannah Black's description of Dana Schutz's Open Casket, a painting included in the 2017 Whitney Biennial and one that Black has urged be destroyed. The 'dead black boy' is Emmett Till, a fourteen-year-old who was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/10\/SCH-16_012aL2-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/09\/Navy_baker_and_assistant_removing_loaves_of_bread_from_oven_at_the_Naval_Training_Center_San_Diego_California._-_NARA_-_295582.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1516"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1520,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516\/revisions\/1520"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1519"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1516"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}