{"id":1459,"date":"2022-06-13T10:00:02","date_gmt":"2022-06-13T09:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1459"},"modified":"2022-06-13T10:02:29","modified_gmt":"2022-06-13T09:02:29","slug":"the-internet-never-forgets-how-google-shapes-and-cements-our-identities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/the-internet-never-forgets-how-google-shapes-and-cements-our-identities\/","title":{"rendered":"The Internet Never Forgets: How Google Shapes and Cements Our Identities"},"content":{"rendered":"

I remember sneaking downstairs to use the computer. I was 11, personal computers weren\u2019t really a thing yet. I couldn’t use the computers at school because I was afraid a teacher would discover my search history. We had a computer at home, but it was in the hallway. That\u2019s why I had to wait until everyone was asleep to google “lesbian” to find out why another girl in our year had been called that word.<\/p>\n

We use the internet to discover ourselves. Whether we like it or not, Google shapes that process of discovery. 84.2% of all desktop searches in the United Kingdom originate from Google<\/a>. In this piece I want to highlight two challenges that arise from Google’s overwhelming influence on how we gather information online: the first is about how Google structures our access to information and the second is about the reach of Google\u2019s algorithm coupled with the permanence of online content.<\/p>\n

The first challenge has been well documented by many, most notably by Safiya Noble in her book, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism<\/a>. Noble\u2019s book concerns how the structures of oppression present in the physical world replicate themselves in online spaces. The internet has a power to not only shape, but also to distort our understanding of ourselves. For example, consider the experience that prompted Noble to write her book. At a loss for interesting activities to do with her stepdaughter and nieces, she turned, like we all do, to the internet for help. Alas, as she writes, her \u201csearch on the keywords \u201cblack girls\u201d yielded HotBlackPussy.com as the first hit.\u201d<\/p>\n

Our self-understanding is deeply influenced by other people, and \u201cother people” has come to encompass the internet as well. Some of us were raised in environments surrounded by people very different from us, with few who shared our interests and values, and some actively hostile to them. It was through the internet that many of us were first able to find real, supportive community. It is not only other persons in our physical proximity that affect who we become, we also search for ourselves online and what the internet says about us can have an influence over our understanding of ourselves. But as Noble\u2019s experience speaks to, the internet can also reinforce dehumanizing narratives about those very same identities. Imagine if the top results for \u201clesbian\u201d led one to sites promoting conversion therapy. Or as recently depicted in Heartstopper<\/em>, what if the search for \u201cAm I gay?\u201d prominently displayed hate crimes against the LGBTQIA+ community as the top results? If the only narratives available to you of what it means to be gay involve being assaulted or \u201ccorrected\u201d, then it becomes very difficult to accept that identity as part of yourself. Or worse, it may cause you to internalize that negativity as about you<\/em>.<\/p>\n

To see how the internet has come to have this power, consider the success of Google\u2019s PageRank algorithm. This algorithm set Google apart from other search engines and has made \u2018Google\u2019 synonymous with the process of searching itself. Inspired by academic citations, where the number of citations a paper has is taken as an indication of its importance and influence, Larry Page and Sergey Brin extended this logic to hyperlinks on the web. The algorithm prioritizes sources that are linked from other sources. This algorithm allowed Google to sort search results such that well-established sources would appear higher in the results than random blogs (AI generated blogs have changed things recently<\/a>). If you weren\u2019t around for the early days of the internet, you\u2019ll just have to trust me when I say that this was a huge improvement\u2014finally one could reliably sort through the noise that is the web! AskJeeves never stood a chance.<\/p>\n

This now brings me to the second challenge: the reach of Google\u2019s algorithm coupled with\u00a0 the permanence of online content. The influence of Google on our lives can be felt even before we\u2019re born. Consider the plot point in Kim\u2019s Convenience <\/em>where Janet, upon trying to make a website to showcase her photography, wishes her parents had given her a more unique name so her website would appear higher in the search results. Janet can\u2019t stand out because there\u2019s a vast sea of Janet Kim\u2019s who\u2019ve all been archived and indexed by Google. The permanence of the internet makes it harder to stand out. With these types of considerations in mind, parents are vetting their name choices by Googling them first<\/a>. Given\u00a0 that Google\u2019s search results display gender<\/a> and race<\/a> biases, it doesn\u2019t take much work to imagine the inequalities that will be exacerbated as well-off parents carefully curate their children\u2019s online personas so the algorithms prioritize them for the best paying jobs.<\/p>\n

The incentive structure of the internet is to preserve everything. We used to be able to rely on a certain level of social forgetfulness either because of the human limitations of memory or the impermanence of our prior storage systems like paper. Many of us have likely artfully forgotten some embarrassing moment in order to save a friend\u2019s dignity. But the importance of this kind of forgetting is disappearing as large corporations have monetized information through the monetization of data. In other work<\/a>, I\u2019ve written about how a racist world tends us toward racist beliefs, but the digital world shaped by Google\u2019s informational-access monopoly poses a harder problem. At least the physical world, and in turn the basis for our beliefs, can be changed. The internet, on the other hand, is much harder to change. Why? Because the internet never forgets.<\/p>\n

However, not everything should be remembered. We should be the ones in control of our information and how it gets used. For one step in the right direction consider the EU\u2019s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)<\/a> which gives individuals the right to have personal data erased provided certain circumstances are met. More radically, perhaps there should be a statute of limitations on how long the internet can remember things about us. Combining the second challenge with the first, our identity is also shaped by what people know about us and we should have some control over what they get to learn about us. There are some things about us that have an expiration date and shouldn\u2019t follow us around constraining our futures.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"I remember sneaking downstairs to use the computer. I was 11, personal computers weren\u2019t really a thing yet. I couldn't use the computers at school because I was afraid a […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1462,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Rima Basu \"The Internet Never Forgets: How Google Shapes and Cements Our Identities\" on Open for debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[103,120,44],"custom_author":[344],"class_list":["post-1459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-google","tag-identity","tag-social-media","custom_author-basu-rima"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-nx","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1647,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/leave-it-to-the-machines-re-evaluating-the-kasparov-reply\/","url_meta":{"origin":1459,"position":0},"title":"Leave it to the Machines? Re-evaluating the Kasparov reply","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"March 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In 1997, Garry Kasparov became the first world chess champion to lose a match to a computer, IBM\u2019s Deep Blue. Kasparov initially thought the IBM team cheated after the computer played what GM Yasser Seirawan described as a \u2018human like move\u2019 that \u2018sent Garry into a tizzy\u2019. As Kasparov later\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"A man walks away from a chess match","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/03\/Kasparov.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/03\/Kasparov.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/03\/Kasparov.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1032,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/online-illusions-of-understanding\/","url_meta":{"origin":1459,"position":1},"title":"Online illusions of understanding","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"October 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"An online intellectual paradise? The internet and social media provide us with plenty of opportunities to educate ourselves, to learn new things, and to deepen our understanding. A world of knowledge at your fingertips, as the slogan goes. This might seem like an intellectual paradise. And in many ways, it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2020\/10\/internet.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/what-is-google-doing-to-us\/","url_meta":{"origin":1459,"position":2},"title":"What is Google Doing to Us?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"[snippet id=\"305\" label=\"Emma Gordon and Adam Carter\"] By J. Adam Carter and Emma C. Gordon Suppose you wanted to know who the first pope was after St. Peter (answer: Pope Linus, born 10 AD), or what the oldest continuously habited city in the world is (answer: Damascus, Syria, continuously inhabited\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2017\/12\/smartphone-2781457_1280.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1665,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/questions-are-a-form-of-power-and-who-gets-to-ask-them-matters\/","url_meta":{"origin":1459,"position":3},"title":"Questions are a form of power (and who gets to ask them matters)","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"March 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Questions are a form of power. Given how ubiquitous they are in our everyday lives, this truth about questions is easy to miss but not, I think, hard to appreciate. Questions bond us, inform us, and invite us to participate. They direct our attention to one thing and away from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/03\/White-men-asking-questions.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/03\/White-men-asking-questions.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/03\/White-men-asking-questions.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/03\/White-men-asking-questions.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1469,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/extended-confirmation-bias-when-the-mind-leaks-into-algorithms\/","url_meta":{"origin":1459,"position":4},"title":"Extended confirmation bias: When the mind leaks into algorithms","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0It\u2019s no secret that when we are online, websites (Google, Facebook, YouTube etc.) often use algorithms to infer our preferences, interests, or attitudes from our digital footprints (our browsing, clicks, \u2018likes\u2019) to personalize content to us (about 12 to 47% search results are personalized). Consequently, information we encounter online often\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1639,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/narrative-devices\/","url_meta":{"origin":1459,"position":5},"title":"Narrative Devices","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Memory plays an important role in shaping our sense of who and what we are. Our memories about ourselves \u2013 where we were born, where we grew up, the books we read as teenagers, the heartbreaks we have suffered \u2013 form part of the autobiographical narrative of who we understand\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"A watch with apps","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/simon-daoudi-2wFoa040m8g-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/simon-daoudi-2wFoa040m8g-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/simon-daoudi-2wFoa040m8g-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/simon-daoudi-2wFoa040m8g-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/simon-daoudi-2wFoa040m8g-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/02\/simon-daoudi-2wFoa040m8g-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/06\/google.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1459"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1459\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1463,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1459\/revisions\/1463"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1462"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1459"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}