{"id":1281,"date":"2021-09-06T10:00:40","date_gmt":"2021-09-06T09:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1281"},"modified":"2021-09-02T17:40:09","modified_gmt":"2021-09-02T16:40:09","slug":"on-anonymity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/on-anonymity\/","title":{"rendered":"On Anonymity"},"content":{"rendered":"

After the England men’s football team lost to Italy on penalties on the 11th<\/sup> of July, the three England players who missed penalties\u2014Marcus Rashford, Bukayo Saka, and Jadon Sancho\u2014were targeted with racist abuse on their social media accounts. Both events had an air of inevitability about them. The pattern of abuse reminds us that social media is a proper part of the real world: the monkey emojis posted to Bukayo Saka’s Instagram accounts are continuous with monkey chants and bananas thrown by spectators at matches, and were complemented by defaced murals in Darlington and Manchester. The reactions to these events have been a mixed bag: the mural in Manchester were covered with supportive messages and England flags, while the Greater Manchester Police said that they believed that the slogan<\/a> scrawled over the mural in Manchester was “not of a racial nature”<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The failure of social media companies’ content moderation systems to deal with racist abuse leaves a space for newspaper columnists<\/a> to resurrect the idea that the best way to deal with abuse on social media is get rid of online anonymity. Policies in this area have been floating around for a while, but seem to be building momentum. A petition to the UK parliament to require an ID check before opening a social media account started by the writer and businesswoman Katie Price currently has 687,000 signatures<\/a>. The government’s response to this petition promises that upcoming Online Safety legislation “will address anonymous harmful activity.”<\/p>\n

Debates about the benefits and costs of anonymity are complicated, and involve balancing the harms of anonymous abuse with the benefits of anonymity for minority groups<\/a>. And, as Francesca Sobande points out in a quote on these proposals<\/a> in the New Statesman<\/em>, that it is a profound distortion to present racism as a social media problem<\/em> while murals are being defaced, the police are denying that racist abuse is ‘of a racial nature’, and the Prime Minister has a history of racist newspaper columns.<\/p>\n

Before we take on these questions, we need to take a step back and think about a more basic question: what exactly is<\/em> anonymity?<\/p>\n

Etymologically, anonymity is connected to the idea of nameless<\/em>ness, and with pseudonymity, which we might think of as the use of a name other than one’s ‘real’ name. At first pass, we might think that a person is anonymous in some context if they use no name, or use a name other than their real name. Ordinary language doesn’t appear to have a strong mandate about whether pseudonymity is a species of anonymity. This might make us think of anonymity as primarily a linguistic<\/em> phenomenon about what name one uses.<\/p>\n

But, as with England penalties, things quickly get messy.<\/p>\n

First up, what is a ‘real’ name? I use lots of names in different contexts. Sometimes I use my first name, other times various shortenings of my first name, one or both of my surnames, and sometimes my full name with my middle name. I’m not cool enough to have a nickname, but lots of people are primarily known by a nickname, or are called different names by family, friends, or different communities (is a drag name a pseudonym?). Naming practices are, to put it bluntly, pretty chaotic. All of these names are directly referential devices which behave semantically like proper names, but is one of them my real name? The best candidate for a ‘real’ name is the name printed on government documents (and the names it contains), but in lots of cases this will not be the name that someone uses in their day-to-day life.<\/p>\n

Secondly, it isn’t clear that the use of non-standard names is the only important sense of anonymity. The pseudonym ‘Elena Ferrante’ is rather different to ‘James S. A. Corey’. Ferrante’s identity is a closely guarded secret, whereas ‘Corey’ is an open collective name for the writers Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck. Since both authors are using non-standard names, in the linguistic sense both are anonymous, but we would want to say that there is another sense in which Ferrante is anonymous and Corey is not. These sense of anonymity that distinguishes Ferrante and Corey is epistemic<\/em> rather than linguistic. There are a couple of ways we can think about this epistemic sense. Kathleen Wallace<\/a> argues that we should think about anonymity as a gradable phenomenon concerning how many of someone’s traits can be coordinated. I think that this proposal is on the right lines, but we can give it a clearer gloss by thinking about knowing who <\/em>someone is. If you know who someone is, they are not anonymous to you. (It\u2019s not clear to me whether the absence of knowledge-who entails anonymity, or if there are extra conditions required).<\/p>\n

One benefit of thinking about anonymity in terms of knowing-who is that we can get a grip on the messiness of claims about anonymity. Our talk about knowing who is notoriously context-sensitive<\/a>. Knowing-who ascriptions often come with what Maria Aloni calls a method of identification<\/em><\/a>. If we’re in the pub and you ask me whether I know who Justin Webb is, I’m likely to assent (he’s a well-known BBC radio 4 news host). If we were looking at a stack of photographs and you asked me if I knew who Webb was, I would say that I didn’t. Aloni proposes that relative to an auditory or descriptive mode of identification I know who Webb is, but relative to a visual mode of identification, I do not. This means that in lots of contexts it will be possible to know who people are, without knowing what their name is. In a context in which a descriptive mode of identification is salient, I can know who the man walking down the street is if I know that he is the only male presenter on the Today programs. Claims about anonymity also seem to be relative to modes of identification: walking down the street, Webb is anonymous in a way that a television presenter would not be, but talking on the radio he is not anonymous.<\/p>\n

The distinction between the epistemic and linguistic senses of anonymity has two upshots for thinking about online accountability.<\/p>\n

The first is that anonymity is not a single, or particularly stable phenomenon. There are at least two different senses of anonymity (the linguistic and epistemic senses). And neither of these is especially stable: the linguistic sense is unclear because we don’t have a good distinction between ‘real’ and ‘fake’ names, and the epistemic sense is extremely context-sensitive. Helen Nissenbaum<\/a> argues that the morally important phenomenon is whether people are identifiable and points out that it is readily possible to identify people without using their names. This might point us toward the epistemic sense as being the core notion. With that said, names remain an important way of acquiring and communicating knowledge about other people, so we will probably want to hold on to the linguistic sense of anonymity.<\/p>\n

The second point is that there isn’t a strong connection between anonymity and accountability. Using a ‘fake’ name is a way to control who knows what about you, not a magic ring that makes you completely unknowable. A long-term member of an online community who uses a stable screenname might be anonymous (in the linguistic sense, and relative to some modes of identification), but they will still have a reputation to uphold that incentivises them not to make false or harmful claims. Their screenname doesn’t make them unaccountable, it allows them to curate the community they are accountable to.<\/p>\n

In Seeing Like a State,<\/em> James C. Scott points out that stable names and surnames are an important piece of epistemic technology for the modern states. Without stable names, it would be impossible for a state to keep track of taxes, inheritance, criminal records, or demographic information. Bureaucratic needs have led to some remarkable naming exercises. Before colonisation by the Spanish, people who lived in the Philippines did not use surnames, and those who took surnames when baptised chose from a very small pool, making them unhelpful for discriminating between individuals. In 1849, the colonial governor Narciso Claver\u00eda y Zald\u00faa decreed that all subjects would have surnames, to be drawn from the Cat\u00e1logo alfab\u00e9tico de apellidos<\/em><\/a>.<\/em> These names were divvied up by location, starting by allocating ‘A’ names to people from the provincial capital, and finishing the alphabet in the Island of Cataduanes.<\/p>\n

Scott’s anarchist take on the social epistemology of names reminds us that the salient effect of instituting some kind of real name policy would be that our online lives would become even more easily surveyable by government institutions (much as they are already easily surveyable by advertising companies). At present, social media sites retain a modicum of the chaos of non-governmental naming practices, and we might worry that ‘real name’ policies replace chaotic naming practices which can accommodate a wide variety of needs by a regimented system which primarily serves the needs of bureaucracy.<\/p>\n

I worry that between them, opponents and defenders of anonymity have constructed a false choice that doesn’t do justice to the complexity of the phenomenon. On the one hand, opponents of anonymity worry about Ring of Gyges-style chaos, and on the other defenders of anonymity raise concerns about the complete surveyability of our online lives by government. Part of the point of distinguishing the variety of phenomena which go under the heading of anonymity was to demonstrate that there are lots of different ways in which we can modulate who knows what about us\u2014both by the medium of names, and by other means\u2014and although it is tempting to fall into the authoritarian imaginary, there are lots of legitimate purposes for governments making citizens surveyable (for example to collect population health data). Things might be clearer if we disambiguated our debate into two questions, asking first what we should be able to know about one another, and secondly what the government should be able to know about us.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"After the England men's football team lost to Italy on penalties on the 11th of July, the three England players who missed penalties\u2014Marcus Rashford, Bukayo Saka, and Jadon Sancho\u2014were targeted […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1284,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Josh Habgood-Coote (@impractknow) On Anonymity on Open for debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[313,314,312,131,44],"custom_author":[179],"class_list":["post-1281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-accountability","tag-anonymity","tag-knowledge-who","tag-racism","tag-social-media","custom_author-habdgood-coote-josh"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-kF","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1802,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/how-to-become-an-incel\/","url_meta":{"origin":1281,"position":0},"title":"In-Between Identities: The Online and Offline World of Incels","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"October 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduction Discussions around incels \u2013 involuntary celibates \u2013 have become prevalent across popular social media platforms such as X\/Twitter. However, it is not always clear who exactly is behind the incel identity. Are incels just people who can\u2019t find love, or is there more to it? Can anyone fall into\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/man_computers.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/man_computers.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/10\/man_computers.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1481,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/is-being-resilient-an-unfair-burden\/","url_meta":{"origin":1281,"position":1},"title":"Is being resilient an unfair burden?","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Navigating the world of public debate can be a difficult task. There are many hurdles to overcome in the process of finding out about and sharing one\u2019s views on social and political issues. There is the long and difficult task of sorting through the mass of available information in search\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2022\/07\/dan-meyers-hluOJZjLVXc-unsplash-2.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":432,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/poisonous-words-arrogance-bullshit-and-accusations-of-lying-in-public-discourse\/","url_meta":{"origin":1281,"position":2},"title":"Poisonous Words: Arrogance, Bullshit and Accusations of Lying in Public Discourse","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"April 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"As is common with international incidents today, the Skripal case, in which a Russian double agent and his daughter were poisoned with a nerve agent in Salisbury, England, has generated an abundance of fake news, conspiracy theories, deceptions, misleading, bullshit and lying. There have been many accusations of lying and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/04\/all-explanations-arerubbish4754734_43ced6dc.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/04\/all-explanations-arerubbish4754734_43ced6dc.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/04\/all-explanations-arerubbish4754734_43ced6dc.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1194,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/with-the-intent-to-defraud-or-mislead-opioids-corporate-propaganda-and-epistemic-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":1281,"position":3},"title":"\u201cWith the intent to defraud or mislead\u201d: Opioids, corporate propaganda, and epistemic rights","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"May 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"In May 2007, Purdue Frederick Company Inc., an af\ufb01liate of Purdue Pharma, along with three of its top executives, were ordered to pay fines totalling $634 million after pleading guilty to criminal charges of misbranding in relation to the opioid-based painkiller, OxyContin. Among other things, the company falsely claimed that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/05\/Opioids_02-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/05\/Opioids_02-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/05\/Opioids_02-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/05\/Opioids_02-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/05\/Opioids_02-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/05\/Opioids_02-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":685,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/argument-repair\/","url_meta":{"origin":1281,"position":4},"title":"Argument Repair","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s easy to blame current problems with public discourse on the brevity of on-line communication. People are moving away from blogs to image exchanges. TLDR. Limited word counts (such as on Twitter) and the combination of immediacy with anonymity lend to verbal fighting. Quick comebacks receive rewards of \u201clikes\u201d and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/05\/argument-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1122,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/emotional-imperialism-in-public-discourse\/","url_meta":{"origin":1281,"position":5},"title":"Emotional Imperialism in Public Discourse","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"February 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Alfred Archer\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Benjamin Matheson \u00a0 \u00a0 In order to protest police brutality and racial injustice in the USA, in 2016 the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/02\/Archer8324095.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/09\/2_0_image001-2.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1281"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1285,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1281\/revisions\/1285"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1284"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1281"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}