{"id":1257,"date":"2021-08-09T10:00:13","date_gmt":"2021-08-09T09:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/?p=1257"},"modified":"2021-08-02T14:44:15","modified_gmt":"2021-08-02T13:44:15","slug":"egotism-in-higher-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/egotism-in-higher-education\/","title":{"rendered":"Egotism in Higher Education"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Tracy Llanera and Nicholas Smith<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Crisis or no crisis, vice-chancellors in Australia remain exorbitantly well-paid. While most of them committed to pay cuts in 2020 in response to the pandemic, the Times Higher Education<\/em> points out that many university leaders are back to their seven-figure earnings<\/a> this coming academic year. This is difficult news to swallow for the 17, 000 people in the Australian university sector who lost their jobs<\/a> last year. Alas, the guillotine remains in place for more faculty and administrative staff in 2021.<\/p>\n

In this debacle, Australian National University\u2019s vice-chancellor and Nobel laureate Brian Schmidt stands out for negotiating his salary down to $484, 000<\/a> (AUD). On the one hand, this gesture seems morally praiseworthy: finally, a head who\u2019s humbling himself by receiving only half of the average annual salary for a chief executive at an Australian university. On the other, why should this move strike us as heroic? The remuneration level for university leaders in the Global North is so outrageously high that even after a 50% cut it still looks generous. It can still feed the families of ten adjunct lecturers, who are among the worst off in this entire crisis.<\/p>\n

But the \u2018look after number one\u2019 attitude of universities isn\u2019t only on display in the privileges they accord to their bosses. Egotism has become endemic in all aspects of university life, transforming our very understanding of the purpose of higher education. We take egotism to be the attitude or cultural trait that (1) exhibits knowingness and self-satisfaction with one\u2019s knowledge, status, and achievements; (2) encourages people and groups to think and act narrowly; (3) kills off the capacity to imagine and to inspire new possibilities and forms of life.<\/p>\n

Many universities today have been cultivating an egotist culture and it has taken a global pandemic to fully expose its costs. These costs are not confined to the morally decadent gulf that exists between those at the top and the bottom. More subtly, they include a betrayal of the promise of a higher <\/em>education; a dulling of the romance, the joy, and delight in learning that enervates our capacity for self-growth.<\/p>\n

World Class Egotism<\/strong><\/p>\n

One of the first things anyone who works in or attends a university learns is the importance of appearing \u2018world-class\u2019. Look at the self-description of any university entity and it will be gushing with superlatives. In the clamour to appear the best, new ways of appearing even better and bigger than others must be invented. Amidst the subsequent madness, \u2018excellence\u2019 has become bog-standard and anything less than \u2018well-above world standard\u2019 is frowned upon.<\/p>\n

Shameless boasting no longer raises an eyebrow. When parading to prospective students, all sorts of outlandish promises are made. Some universities claim that their curricula will \u2018future-proof\u2019 their students; that by doing their courses, they will be \u2018job-ready\u2019 whatever it is they go on to do. But how do these experts in curriculum design know what the future holds? And in any case, as Hannah Arendt once pointed out, isn\u2019t the future for the next generation to make? In the current climate, even to ask such questions is to risk accusations of betrayal, of putting some nebulous ideal of education before the \u2018real needs\u2019 of students.<\/p>\n

The practice of instrumentalizing higher education, of justifying university study exclusively in terms of the advantages it brings to a consumer in the job market, comes as at a price: it narrows higher education as a training ground for economic prosperity, for getting ahead of others, killing off any love that might be attached to university life. Universities appeal to and encourage the egotism of students by offering them a product whose primary use is to help them climb the professional and social ladder. But if students can only relate to their university education this way, they will miss what is arguably the distinctive and most important thing about it.<\/p>\n

Delighting in Growth<\/strong><\/p>\n

Universities, ideally speaking, can be places that cultivate the process of self-growth. As the pragmatist philosopher Richard Rorty has put it, studying in universities allows students to undergo \u2018self-enlargement\u2019. Self-enlargement is Rorty\u2019s take on what his fellow pragmatist and educationalist John Dewey called \u2018growth\u2019. Growth as self-enlargement occurs in two main ways: through projects of self-creation and widening relations of solidarity. Self-creation involves the making of oneself anew and the adoption for oneself of a \u2018final vocabulary\u2019, or a language that expresses one\u2019s commitments, self-projects, and understanding and relationship with others and the world. Widening solidarity involves expanding the group to which one feels some belonging. At the heart of both are encounters with real or imaginary people, and these encounters reveal the limits and narrowness of one\u2019s previous sense of self. In taking knowingness and self-satisfaction as its enemies, a culture of self-enlargement is the opposite of a culture of egotism.<\/p>\n

When serving the goal of self-enlargement, a university education will be one in which the love<\/em> of learning\u2014doing experiments, reading books, engaging in conversation, learning from the experiences of people unlike ourselves, discovering the life of other communities, and so on\u2014finds full and inclusive expression. Going to university, understood as a place where projects of self-creation and unknown solidarities beckon, would be more like entering a romance that inspires and expands one\u2019s experience of life, rather than steeling oneself for success in a particular occupation.<\/p>\n

Education for Democracy<\/strong><\/p>\n

It is also by realizing the goal of self-enlargement \u2013 by facilitating projects of self-creation and widening solidarities \u2013 that a university education contributes fundamentally to democracy. For democracy, understood not so much as a technique of government but as a way of living together, is precisely the form of collective life bound together by this ideal. The citizens of a democracy, in this expansive sense, are patriotic about the form of life in which individuals can recreate themselves within an ever-widening sense of community. As understood by Dewey and Rorty, democracy is fundamentally a growth-bringing, self-enlarging experiment in living \u2013 an education writ large in which everyone participates.<\/p>\n

If this is right, then the problem with cultures of egotism is not just their epistemic arrogance and skill for romance-stopping: they are also a threat to democracy in the expansive sense. Egotism in universities is incompatible with their educative function in a democracy. Much of the misery of the contemporary university, its \u2018dark side\u2019, can be understood as a consequence of this self-absorbed culture. We should stand up to egotism, wherever it exists.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Note:<\/strong> This essay is based on the chapter \u201cA Culture of Egotism: Rorty and Higher Education\u201d, The Promise of the University: Reclaiming Humanity, Humility, and Hope, <\/em>ed. \u00c1ine Mahon, forthcoming with Springer.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Stock Photo by Joseph Chan @yulokhan<\/p>\n

https:\/\/unsplash.com\/photos\/YFhGIQhZsTU<\/a><\/p>\n

Free to use under the Unsplash License<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"By Tracy Llanera and Nicholas Smith Crisis or no crisis, vice-chancellors in Australia remain exorbitantly well-paid. While most of them committed to pay cuts in 2020 in response to the […]","protected":false},"author":1319,"featured_media":1259,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Egotism in Higher Education by Tracy Llanera and Nicholas Smith on Open for Debate","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[71,88,305,168],"custom_author":[306],"class_list":["post-1257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-open-for-debate","tag-democracy","tag-education","tag-higher-education","tag-value","custom_author-llanera-tracy"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8KPlM-kh","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":819,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/places-of-formation-cultivating-open-mindedness-amongst-university-students\/","url_meta":{"origin":1257,"position":0},"title":"Places of formation: Cultivating open-mindedness amongst university students","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"December 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bethan Willis\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Ed Brooks In the ongoing discussions around Brexit our relationship to place, near and far, has become a central element of our political discourse. This has perhaps fed into the burgeoning interest in the civic\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/12\/Unsplash-image-for-blog-post.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/12\/Unsplash-image-for-blog-post.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/12\/Unsplash-image-for-blog-post.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/12\/Unsplash-image-for-blog-post.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/12\/Unsplash-image-for-blog-post.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2019\/12\/Unsplash-image-for-blog-post.png?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1733,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/a-study-of-the-virtue-of-epistemic-collaborativeness\/","url_meta":{"origin":1257,"position":1},"title":"A Study of the Virtue of Epistemic Collaborativeness","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"July 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Agents can achieve far greater things when working in groups than individually. For instance, some of the most important scientific theories and findings have been the product of epistemic collaboration (see e.g. Einstein and Grossman's collaborative work in developing the relativistic theory of gravitation). But what is the personality trait\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/african-g242c4c526_640.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/african-g242c4c526_640.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2023\/07\/african-g242c4c526_640.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/ruminating-on-fake-news-online-education-and-intellectual-humility\/","url_meta":{"origin":1257,"position":2},"title":"Ruminating on Fake News, Online Education, and Intellectual Humility","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"June 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"From 2015 until last month (May, 2018), I was involved with a project at the University of Edinburgh, which aimed to produce a massive open online course (or MOOC) on intellectual humility. One of the central goals of the project was to give various academics who are producing extremely valuable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/06\/park_white_black_water_rain_tom_oregon_canon-296566.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":486,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/improving-moral-education-through-neuroscience\/","url_meta":{"origin":1257,"position":3},"title":"Improving moral education through neuroscience","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 13, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Thanks to the rapid development of science and technology, scholars interested in morality now have more sophisticated ways to do their research. To date, relatively simple methods, such as the interview and self-report questionnaire, have been available to study morality among human subjects. However, achievements in the field of neuroscience\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/08\/fMRI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/08\/fMRI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/08\/fMRI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":499,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/applying-findings-from-neuroscience-to-education-in-practice-and-educational-policy-making\/","url_meta":{"origin":1257,"position":4},"title":"Applying Findings from Neuroscience to Education in Practice and Educational Policy-Making","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"September 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"In this blog post, the last post of my post series, I intend to outline, by means of concrete examples, how findings from neuroscience can contribute practically to the improvement of education. As a prior teacher in moral education in Korean secondary schools, I was interested in how to effectively\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2018\/09\/Evstafiev-barocoa-school.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":492,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/identifying-core-psychological-processes-with-neuroimaging-experiments-to-improve-education-in-practice\/","url_meta":{"origin":1257,"position":5},"title":"Identifying Core Psychological Processes with Neuroimaging Experiments to Improve Education in Practice","author":"Alessandra Tanesini","date":"August 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Following my previous post\u00a0for this blog, in this post I discuss why examining psychological processes related to teaching and learning can provide useful insights about how to improve education. Many educators might think that they have their own tacit knowledge about how to make their classroom activities effective and that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open for Debate"","block_context":{"text":"Open for Debate","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/category\/open-for-debate\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"meta_box":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/533\/2021\/08\/uniinflamephoto-1556711635-ab14cb69873a.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1257"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1267,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257\/revisions\/1267"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1259"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1257"},{"taxonomy":"custom_author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/openfordebate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom_author?post=1257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}