{"id":75,"date":"2015-11-16T18:25:39","date_gmt":"2015-11-16T18:25:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/?p=75"},"modified":"2015-11-16T18:25:39","modified_gmt":"2015-11-16T18:25:39","slug":"no-porridge-for-visitors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/no-porridge-for-visitors\/","title":{"rendered":"No porridge for visitors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When the royal custodians of the Templars&#8217; estates presented their annual accounts at the exchequer, the accounts were checked, summarised\u00a0and copied into the rolls which formed a permanent record of the income and expenditure for each estate. Most of the original accounts do not survive, as after the official copy had been made they had no further use. However, a few do survive and not only do they provide valuable detail of day-to-day expenditure but also (when compared to the enrolled account) show what the exchequer officials regarded as invalid or not worth mentioning.<\/p>\n<p>At Upleadon, Herefordshire, in 1308, the expenses recorded by Sheriff Walter of Haklut included\u00a0six quarters of oats for flour made for potage for the farmworkers (an expense at every former Templar house &#8212; see my earlier blog on potage) and <em>aliorum supervenient&#8217;<\/em> &#8212; other people &#8216;coming over&#8217;, that is, visitors to the estate. It\u00a0would not be surprising if the Templars normally gave food to travellers who arrived at the house: such hospitality was normal in religious houses, and in 1338 the Hospitallers would record considerable expenses for giving hospitality to <em>supervenientes<\/em>. But the words &#8216;<em>aliorum supervenient<\/em>&#8216; have been crossed off Sheriff Haklut&#8217;s list of expenses, and there is no mention\u00a0of potage for visitors at the corresponding point in the enrolled account. That said, the\u00a0six quarters of oats\u00a0were allowed as an expense: but the enrolled account states that the whole quantity was used to feed the farmworkers, not to feed visitors.<\/p>\n<p>In the following year, there was no mention of <em>supervenientes<\/em> at this point in the account, but by that time the sheriff would have known that\u00a0that while the estate was being administered for the king,\u00a0religious hospitality was no longer allowed as an expense.<\/p>\n<p>But because the enrolled accounts left out mention of food for visitors, this means that modern scholars\u00a0studying these enrolled accounts cannot tell whether or not the Templars&#8217; estates used to give hospitality to travellers. We only know that Upleadon did because of the chance survival of the sheriff&#8217;s detailed account.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_77\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/200\/2015\/11\/DSCF8529.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-77 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/200\/2015\/11\/DSCF8529-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"The modern Temple Farm, on the site of the Templars' commandery of Upleadon, near Bosbury, Herefordshire\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/200\/2015\/11\/DSCF8529-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/200\/2015\/11\/DSCF8529-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/200\/2015\/11\/DSCF8529-624x467.jpg 624w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-77\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The modern Temple Farm, on the site of the Templars&#8217; commandery of Upleadon, near Bosbury, Herefordshire<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"When the royal custodians of the Templars' estates presented their annual accounts at the exchequer, the accounts were checked, summarised\u00a0and copied into the rolls which formed a permanent record of [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":208,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[23,35,21,87,27,37,36],"class_list":["post-75","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-knights-templar","tag-almonry","tag-alms","tag-almsgiving","tag-knights-templar","tag-medieval-farmworkers","tag-porridge","tag-visitors"],"meta_box":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/208"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75\/revisions\/78"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}