{"id":171,"date":"2016-01-19T13:00:40","date_gmt":"2016-01-19T13:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/?p=171"},"modified":"2016-05-12T10:36:36","modified_gmt":"2016-05-12T10:36:36","slug":"women-workers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/women-workers\/","title":{"rendered":"Women workers on the Templars&#8217; estates"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A quick glance through the accounts of the Templars&#8217; estates while they were in King Edward II&#8217;s hands suggests that there were very few women employed. The cook who made the porridge for the farmworkers was\u00a0described as\u00a0a &#8216;<em>garcio<\/em>&#8216; or lad at\u00a0Temple Bulstrode in Buckinghamshire (Easter to Michaelmas 1308: TNA E 358\/18 rot. 7): at Horspath in Oxfordshire\u00a0(first four months of\u00a01308: E 358\/19 rot. 26), at Preen in Shropshire (from 1308 onwards: E 358\/20 rot. 5 dorse), in Herefordshire (from 1308 onwards: E 358\/18 rot. 2); and as a &#8216;<em>homo<\/em>&#8216; (a man or person)\u00a0at Thornton\u00a0in Northumberland\u00a0during the period from November 1308 to the end of September 1309 (E 358\/18 rot. 52(2). But when we look a little further, we find that an &#8216;<em>ancilla<\/em>&#8216; or maid was making the farmworkers&#8217; porridge at Temple Bulstrode for the first four months of 1308 (E 358\/18 rot. 6 dorse), at Chelsing in\u00a0Hertfordshire\u00a0and at Cressing,\u00a0Witham, Roydon and Chingford in Essex for the first month of 1308 (E 358\/19 rot. 52 and 52 dorse) and at Hillcrombe and Broughton in Worcestershire (E 199\/46\/21 and E 359\/19 rot. 47 dorse), Lydley and Stanton Long in Shropshire (E 358\/20 rot. 5 dorse) and Thornton from January to November 1308 and in 1309\u201310 (E 358\/18 rots 6 dorse and 52 dorse). There was also a maid employed at Gislingham on the Norfolk\/Suffolk border (in 1308: E 358\/18 rot. 3), and women were employed at Garway in Herefordshire\u00a0(in 1308: E 358\/18 rot. 2), at Guiting in Gloucestershire (in 1308: E 358\/18 rot. 5)\u00a0\u00a0and at Swanton in Bedfordshire (in 1308\u20139: E 358\/18 rot. 24)\u00a0to milk the sheep, at Balsall in Warwickshire\u00a0to collect straw after harvest (TNA: PRO E 358\/19, mem. 40(1) recto) and at Bulstrode to gather up the crop after reaping.<\/p>\n<p>So women were employed, even by\u00a0this male religious community, to carry out certain tasks: sometimes for the unskilled farming jobs, but also to perform jobs requiring skill\u00a0(milking) or inside the house as cook.<\/p>\n<p>Employment changed during the time that the sheriffs ran the\u00a0estates. At Bulstrode there was a woman employed as cook during the Templars&#8217; time, but after the king took over the estate she was replaced by a man. At Chelsing the &#8216;<em>ancilla<\/em>&#8216; or\u00a0maid\u00a0employed in January 1308 to make porridge was replaced by a &#8216;cook&#8217; after 9 February (E 358\/18 rot. 24 dorse), although the cook was paid at the same rate as the maid had been.\u00a0But at Thornton there was a woman employed from January to November 1308, a man employed in 1308-9 and then a woman again\u00a0in 1309-10. At Lydley the\u00a0person who made the porridge was described as a &#8216;<em>serviens<\/em>&#8216; (servant: this\u00a0could\u00a0be male or female)\u00a0from 1311-12 (E 358\/19 rot. 36 and 54), but an &#8216;<em>ancilla<\/em>&#8216; (maid) in earlier years; at Stanton Long the cook\u00a0became a &#8216;<em>serviens<\/em>&#8216; in 1311-13\u00a0but was\u00a0an &#8216;<em>ancilla<\/em>&#8216; again\u00a0in 1313-14. Again,\u00a0the wages paid remained the same, whether a woman or a man was working as cook.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly one\u00a0barrier to\u00a0identifying these women workers is\u00a0the variety of\u00a0terms\u00a0used to describe them: it is likely that there was a woman making porridge at Lydley throughout the period 1308\u201312, even though the term used to describe her in the enrolled accounts changed from &#8216;<em>ancilla<\/em>&#8216; to &#8216;<em>serviens<\/em>&#8216;. It&#8217;s also possible that the &#8216;maid&#8217; at Chelsing continued to work there after 9 February 1308 even though her job title was\u00a0amended\u00a0to &#8216;cook&#8217;. Another problem is that detail\u00a0could be\u00a0lost when the detailed particulars of account submitted by the sheriffs were enrolled into the great Pipe Rolls at the Exchequer. Edmund de Burnham&#8217;s particulars of account for Temple Bulstrode for 12 March 1309\u201328 Sept 1309 (British Library, Harley Rolls A 25) include under &#8216;dairy costs&#8217; the hire of two women to milk the ewes; but the diary costs were struck through with the comment that the dairy expenses should be included under &#8216;necessities&#8217;, where they would be a single figure.<\/p>\n<p>See also my post about <a href=\"https:\/\/gawainsmum.wordpress.com\/2016\/02\/22\/maid-in-the-kitchen-at-temple-cressing\/\" target=\"_blank\">the kitchen maid at Temple Cressing<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A quick glance through the accounts of the Templars' estates while they were in King Edward II's hands suggests that there were very few women employed. The cook who made [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":208,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[26,90,71,72,101,108,79,105,42,14,24,126,93,100,87,78,27,92,13,37,107,66,28,89,125,106,91],"class_list":["post-171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-knights-templar","tag-arable","tag-bedfordshire","tag-buckinghamshire","tag-bulstrode","tag-chelsing","tag-chingford","tag-cooking","tag-cressing","tag-employees","tag-essex","tag-gislingham","tag-gloucestershire","tag-harvest","tag-hertfordshire","tag-knights-templar","tag-medieval-domestic-staff","tag-medieval-farmworkers","tag-milking","tag-northumberland","tag-porridge","tag-roydon","tag-sheep","tag-shropshire","tag-swanton","tag-temple-guiting","tag-witham","tag-women-workers"],"meta_box":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/208"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171\/revisions\/244"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/knightstemplarsestates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}