Although I was intrigued as to what lay beneath the packing materials, my first thread of research was to look at the risk assessment in the lab. A risk assessment identifies problems, and then reduces them to a safe level using different procedures. Exposure to mould in large quantities and for long durations can lead to sensitisation of the respiratory system and related health conditions. Objects are sealed in polythene wrapping to reduce the health risk and prevent cross contamination with other objects. My research covered mould in relation to heritage objects, as well as the history of this basket. Unfortunately, the object information has become dissociated and the museum is working on piecing together the records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For my initial observations I opened the packaging in a fume cupboard, wearing personal protective equipment – lab coat, FFP3 face mask and nitrile gloves. I partially unwrapped the basket, so I could see the object had two hemispheres made from a dark wood with carved decoration. The mould was dry; a powdery pale green, that I estimated covered 50% of the surface area. I learnt that future treatment would require a larger workspace and resealable packing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Treatment – Stage one <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\nI now had to decide if I was going to sample and culture the mould to identify it, and whether this would inform my treatment. My reading had highlighted two differing views: those who thought identification should be made before proceeding and those who advocated that in smaller incidences identification was unnecessary (CCI, 2017 and Florian, 2002). My instinct was to move forward with the removal of the mould, as I was daunted by the technicalities of culturing and identification. After a conversation with Phil Parkes, I decided to take samples using sterile cotton swabs before brush vacuuming the basket to remove the majority of the visible mould. This would allow me to culture at a later date while not delaying the treatment of the object. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Research – Culturing Mould<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\nSampling for mould can be achieved using different methods. I decided to use cotton swabs that I would then roll over the surface of a culturing medium and enable visual identification. There are limitations to sampling this way; spores from a specific time cannot be isolated so the results will show what has accumulated over time. Also not all moulds grow on all mediums, I chose Potato Dextrose agar (PDA) medium because it supports the growth of both Aspergillus and Pencillium. It was important to keep the mould cultures isolated to prevent contamination of the experiment and minimise the risk to people and other objects. Research into culturing showed that an incubation period of 7 days, with a relative humidity of 70% or above and temperature between 20-35\u00b0C was required. I ran a trial to see if a 13 litre plastic box would provide the right conditions, using a Tinytag monitor to gather the environmental information. The data showed that the box could maintain the temperature and humidity required. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The cultures were visually checked every day and as the week went on there were no signs that any of the ten petri dishes were going to be successful, but on the final day, and to my surprise, three of the dishes had growth on the surface. Inspection under the microscope revealed that two had the correct characteristics for mould; circular growth patterns with the hyphae on the outer edges. Further research into the characteristics of mould grown on PDA, led me to think that this was a Penicillium spp. It was useful to culture the mould, as I now understand the process from the practical side as well as the theoretical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sampling for mould can be achieved using different methods. I decided to use cotton swabs that I would then roll over the surface of a culturing medium and enable visual identification. There are limitations to sampling this way; spores from a specific time cannot be isolated so the results will show what has accumulated over time. Also not all moulds grow on all mediums, I chose Potato Dextrose agar (PDA) medium because it supports the growth of both Aspergillus and Pencillium. It was important to keep the mould cultures isolated to prevent contamination of the experiment and minimise the risk to people and other objects. Research into culturing showed that an incubation period of 7 days, with a relative humidity of 70% or above and temperature between 20-35\u00b0C was required. I ran a trial to see if a 13 litre plastic box would provide the right conditions, using a Tinytag monitor to gather the environmental information. The data showed that the box could maintain the temperature and humidity required. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The cultures were visually checked every day and as the week went on there were no signs that any of the ten petri dishes were going to be successful, but on the final day, and to my surprise, three of the dishes had growth on the surface. Inspection under the microscope revealed that two had the correct characteristics for mould; circular growth patterns with the hyphae on the outer edges. Further research into the characteristics of mould grown on PDA, led me to think that this was a Penicillium spp. It was useful to culture the mould, as I now understand the process from the practical side as well as the theoretical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"Peniciilium](\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/conservation\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/228\/2019\/04\/mould-KList.jpg\")