Unnecessary Harm Caused by Informed Consent
10 May 2021The Medical Research Council (MRC) has funded a project to reduce unnecessary harm caused by the way potential trial harms are communicated to potential patients.
Making informed consent more ethical
Patients need to be informed about potential risks of taking part in clinical trials. A problem is that there are no standards telling researchers or ethics committees how these risks need to be communicated. The research team’s background research suggests that the way harms are communicated can actually increase the risks of the harms occurring. Over half of their sample of 250,000 patients who took placebo pills (like sugar pills) in clinical trials reported some negative side effect (like pain or nausea but also more serious things). Their sample of information leaflets provided to patients also found that potential trial benefits were sometimes not mentioned, with potential harms being emphasized.
The MRC has funded the team, based at Cardiff University (and including researchers from Manchester University, and the University of Aberdeen) to investigate ways to share potential trial harms honestly and completely, yet in a balanced way that does not actually cause unnecessary harms. With input from real patients, trial researchers, industry, and legal experts, they will develop new ways of sharing information about potential trial benefits and harms. They will then test these in five clinical trials, to see whether they reduce harms.
The output of the project will be a set of Principles for Patient Information Leaflets (PrinciPILs), which will help trialists design information about potential trial risks and benefits in an ethical and balanced way that does not cause unnecessary harm. PrinciPILs will also save time because researchers and ethics committees won’t have to reinvent the wheel whenever they are thinking about ways to present potential trial risks and benefits. As one of the reviewers of this project stated, this ‘should have been addressed years ago’.
The Nocebo effect
The nocebo effect (the effect of expecting a negative outcome) has been almost ignored. Epistemic and ethical confusions related to its existence have gone all but unnoticed. Contrary to what is often asserted, adverse events following from taking placebo interventions are not necessarily nocebo effects; they could have arisen due to natural history. Meanwhile, ethical informed consent (in clinical trials and clinical practice) has centred almost exclusively on the need to share intervention risks with patients to preserve their autonomy. Researchers have failed to consider the harm caused by the way in which such risk information is shared. The magnitude of nocebo effects must be measured using control groups consisting of untreated patients. And, because the nocebo effect can produce harm, the principle of non-maleficence must be taken into account alongside the principle of autonomy when obtaining (ethical) informed consent.
Funding
Medical Research Council, award number MR/V020706/1
Notes
For further information or comment, please contact Dr Jeremy Howick, (senior research and principal investigator HowickJ@cardiff.ac.uk) or Professor Kerry Hood (HoodK1@cardiff.ac.uk).
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016