Rapid Set Up of Obstetric Bleeding Study: Lessons from the OBS UK
24 September 2024A Unique Trial Set Up Journey – Obstetric Bleeding Study UK (OBS UK)
OBS UK (OBSUK Study) is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) funded stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention for postpartum haemorrhage. It is being fully coordinated by the CTR’s Population Health and Social Care Division. The primary outcome is the proportion of women receiving allogenic red blood cell transfusion for postpartum haemorrhage. OBS UK is a large study comprising three sub studies at set up (now has five sub studies) – a process evaluation, an economic analysis and psychological component. The main study aims to captures data from approximately 189,000 women and birthing people without the requirement of individual level consent and has the appropriate regulatory approvals from the different nations in the UK in place. Individual consent for standard care, implementation and OBS UK post-partum haemorrhage care will not be sought because the change in management will be delivered at a maternity unit level and therefore to everyone giving birth at that site. Aggregate primary outcome data will be reported by sites for all women and birthing people.
I joined the study team formally on the 1st May 2023 as the Trial Manager, although I had attended some of the study management group meetings prior to this date, I would certainly recommend this prior to formally starting work on a study as it gave me a huge amount of insight into the study and the researchers involved. The study management group was and is very friendly and supportive. In particular the two Chief Investigators and CTR Study Lead are very hands on, helpful and always willing to answer questions. This was particularly important as the trial required a rapid set up.
For example, when one site was struggling with the reimbursement plan for research nurse funding due to the financial restrictions in place for the site the team were able to find a solution and the site were able to join the study.
The first stop go criteria was to have 30 site contracts signed by the 1st February 2024, so a nine month set up period, there isn’t an internal pilot. This was a rather daunting task as due to the nature of the design of the study all the sites needed to start data collection together on the 1st February and 30 sites were required to ensure the study had the statistical power to report the outcomes.
In addition to this, as the main study is UK wide we needed to ensure we had sites from England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Wales was excluded as the maternity units in Wales were already following the OBS care bundle but 4 sites in Wales did undertake the process evaluation sub study. The inclusion criteria for the sites meant they were in general not the very large research active sites which perhaps was an additional challenge.
One of the Chief Investigators had already identified and communicated with potential sites and Principal Investigators. This in my opinion was invaluable in achieving the goal of setting the sites up. Early in May 2023 we met with the interested sites and asked them to return a site assessment form, we could only have a maximum of 36 sites in the study. Initially these forms were slow to return but they then flooded in and we ended up having to choose 36 sites, the rest who met the inclusion criteria were reserve sites. Right from the start it was made very clear that if they wanted to be in the study they had to be set up and ready to start on the 1st February 2024, all sites also needed to be ready to start data collection on day 1 too. This was a message that was repeated and repeated throughout the set period.
Approvals
We applied for ethics approval but also had to apply for Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) approval to link and access electric health records in England without consent under section 251 of the NHS Act 2006 and Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health (PBPP) approval in Scotland to retrieve routinely collected data, from NHS databases, to provide trial outcome data and collect data without consent. As the application for CAG approval is submitted alongside the ethics application we made the decision to apply for CAG approval and then move onto applying for PBPP approval for the Scottish sites. Northern Ireland do not have the equivalent of CAG or PBPP so we spent a lot of time working with the one site there to ensure they could be included and ultimately came up with a solution.
Site set up
Once we had ethics and CAG approval we made sure all the sites had the full Local Information Pack (i.e. all the documents required to complete local R&D review of the site’s capacity and capability to take part in the trial). We were in constant communication with them to ensure they had all the relevant documentation and information to get to the point where contracts could be signed. A large excel spreadsheet was created in Teams to track the progress of each site and Sponsor, who were well aware of the tight timeframe ensured contracts were signed rapidly when they were returned by the sites.
Although we didn’t have PBPP approval when we had CAG approval, we began setting the Scottish sites up and updated them on the progress of the PBPP application.
Site induction visits were carried out on Teams with multiple sites attending the same site induction visit.
Success
Ultimately, we ended up with 32 signed contracts by the 1st February and met the stop go criteria. It was a very steep learning curve with regards to CAG and PBPP and a huge amount of work from the whole team.
Conclusion
On reflection, I believe all the following helped in a rapid set up:
- Team work.
- Early communication with sites and the timelines made explicitly clear.
- Good communication with everyone!
- Early involvement of chief investigators, principal investigators and CTR study lead as appropriate if issues are discovered during the site set up period.
- Organisation is essential to ensure progress of each site is tracked.
- A supportive team and a sense of humour!
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016