{"id":1187,"date":"2016-09-12T09:41:07","date_gmt":"2016-09-12T09:41:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/?p=1187"},"modified":"2022-04-13T16:27:04","modified_gmt":"2022-04-13T16:27:04","slug":"in-focus-cutting-through-the-fog-reducing-background-autofluorescence-in-microscopy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/in-focus-cutting-through-the-fog-reducing-background-autofluorescence-in-microscopy\/","title":{"rendered":"IN FOCUS: Cutting Through the Fog: Reducing Background Autofluorescence in Microscopy."},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"image\">\n<figure class=\"image\"><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n<figure class=\"image\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-bone-sample.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-1329 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-bone-sample.jpg\" alt=\"Autofluorescent bone sample\" width=\"1102\" height=\"512\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-bone-sample.jpg 1102w, https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-bone-sample-300x139.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-bone-sample-768x357.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-bone-sample-1024x476.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1102px) 100vw, 1102px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>Above: Autofluorescence from mixed connective tissues&nbsp;imaged by confocal&nbsp;microscopy (left). The&nbsp;autofluorescent emissions can&nbsp;be spectrally-resolved&nbsp;through&nbsp;wavelength&nbsp;scanning (right). Excitation at 488nm.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Whilst autofluorescence from endogenous fluorophores&nbsp;can reveal much about the biochemical composition of a sample, it can also hamper the microscopic detection&nbsp;of targeted fluorochromes if they&nbsp;emit&nbsp;light at&nbsp;the same wavelengths as endogenous fluors. Indeed, without proper controls, complex&nbsp;background autofluorescence&nbsp;can lead to misinterpretation of image data and generation of false&nbsp;positive results.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Autofluorescence derives&nbsp;from multiple sources&nbsp;within the sample &#8211; the main culprits are &nbsp;NADH and NADPH, lipofuscins, flavins, elastin and collagen (and lignin and chlorophyll in plants). The&nbsp;excitation and emission ranges of the&nbsp;worst offenders have been shown below. It follows that tissues with&nbsp;high collagen and&nbsp;elastin contents,&nbsp;e.g.&nbsp;skin, tendon and cartilage, autofluoresce very brightly; as do tissues that are rich in metabolic breakdown products such as lipofuscin, e.g. liver, spleen etc.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"image\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-data.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-1325\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-data.jpg\" alt=\"Autofluorescent data\" width=\"500\" height=\"245\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-data.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-data-300x147.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/492\/2016\/09\/Autofluorescent-data-768x376.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Adding&nbsp;to the&nbsp;problem is&nbsp;the effect of chemical fixatives&nbsp;(e.g. formalin, glutaraldehyde etc) and solvents used to preserve tissue architecture for&nbsp;microscopy: the cross-linkages generated by these chemicals&nbsp;increase&nbsp;autofluorescence, which can be worsened further&nbsp;by long-term storage of&nbsp;the&nbsp;fixed processed tissues.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">So, dear reader, here&#8217;s some simple&nbsp;advice on steps that you can take to address this common problem:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>1. Include an unlabelled control&nbsp;to&nbsp;evaluate the level of autofluorescence within your&nbsp;sample.<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<li>Observation of unlabelled samples through RGB fluorescent&nbsp;filters (note their transmission characteristics) will help identify where in the visible spectrum the autofluorescent signal is&nbsp;brightest.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/spectral-wavelength-lambda-scanning\/\">Spectral (lambda, wavelength) scanning<\/a> will allow you to precisely identify the fluorescent emission spectra from endogenous fluorochromes and can help separate their emissions&nbsp;from those of your fluorochrome (see above figure).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>2. Select fluorochromes that are outside the range of the&nbsp;autofluorescence.<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<li>If the autofluorescence signal is high&nbsp;in the blue, then move into the green; if it&#8217;s high in the green, move into the red &#8211; or better still,&nbsp;the&nbsp;far red (if your system can detect in this range).<\/li>\n<li>Use modern&nbsp;fluorescent&nbsp;probes&nbsp;(e.g.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/uk\/en\/home\/brands\/molecular-probes\/key-molecular-probes-products\/alexa-fluor\/alexa-fluor-dyes-across-the-spectrum.html\">Alexa Fluor<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/uk\/en\/home\/life-science\/protein-biology\/protein-labeling-crosslinking\/protein-labeling\/fluorescent-protein-labeling\/dylight-fluors-technology-product-guide.html?gclid=CN7LmKDt984CFcQV0woddOsD9g&amp;s_kwcid=AL!3652!3!85589465054!b!!g!!_cat:protein%20labeling&amp;ef_id=VZvdewAAAUmczc8l:20160905085430:s\">Dylight<\/a>, or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sigmaaldrich.com\/life-science\/cell-biology\/detection\/learning-center\/atto.html\">Atto r<\/a>ange) instead of first generation fluorochromes. &nbsp;They&nbsp;are brighter, more photo-stable and have&nbsp;narrower excitation and emission&nbsp;bands. They are also available in variants that&nbsp;span the near UV, visible and far red range of the spectrum, affording you plenty of choice.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>3. Use a microscope with filters optimised for your choice of fluorochromes.<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<li>Band-pass filters which collect emissions within a specific range may&nbsp;be more&nbsp;useful than long-pass filter sets which collect all emissions past a certain wavelength. The narrower the range of the band-pass filter, then the better it can separate fluorophores&nbsp;with close emission spectra.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>4. If the autofluorescence is unevenly distributed within your sample, use targeted microscopy to avoid it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>5. If you can&#8217;t avoid the autofluorescence, then take measures to remove or reduce&nbsp;it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<li>Analyse the pixel intensity distribution within&nbsp;your image and try thresholding out the lower intensity autofluorescence signal.<\/li>\n<li>Pre-bleach your samples in a light box using a high intensity illumination source prior to fluorescent labelling (see below reference)<\/li>\n<li>Treat samples with a&nbsp;chemical&nbsp;reagent (e.g. sodium borohydride, Sudan black B, ammonium ethanol etc) to reduce background autofluorescence (see below reference)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>6. If all else&nbsp;fails,&nbsp;consider the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">use cryoprocessed&nbsp;material&nbsp;as an alternative to chemical fixation and&nbsp;paraffin wax&nbsp;processing.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">avoid long term storage of&nbsp;material\/archival tissue samples.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">try a different detection modality&nbsp;(e.g. immunoperoxidase instead of immunofluorescence)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>AJH<\/p>\n<p>Further reading<\/p>\n<p>Wright Cell Imaging Facility. <a href=\"http:\/\/wwwfacilities.uhnresearch.ca\/wcif\/PDF\/Autofluorescence.pdf\">Autofluorescence: Causes and Cures<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Above: Autofluorescence from mixed connective tissues&nbsp;imaged by confocal&nbsp;microscopy (left). The&nbsp;autofluorescent emissions can&nbsp;be spectrally-resolved&nbsp;through&nbsp;wavelength&nbsp;scanning (right). Excitation at 488nm. Whilst autofluorescence from endogenous fluorophores&nbsp;can reveal much about the biochemical composition of a sample, it can also hamper the microscopic detection&nbsp;of targeted fluorochromes if they&nbsp;emit&nbsp;light at&nbsp;the same wavelengths as endogenous fluors. Indeed, without proper controls, complex&nbsp;background autofluorescence&nbsp;can lead [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":908,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-focus","category-techniques"],"meta_box":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/908"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1187"}],"version-history":[{"count":56,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1969,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1187\/revisions\/1969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cardiff.ac.uk\/bioimaging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}